Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Qt and RAD Studio 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Opti Digital
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
1oT
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Qt
Star Rating
(53)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (48.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QtRAD Studio
Star Rating
(12)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about RAD StudioSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Qt excels in "Straight-Out-the-Box Functionality" with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for those who want to hit the ground running without extensive setup. In contrast, RAD Studio, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.7 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that RAD Studio offers superior "Quality of Support" with a score of 8.9, which is notably higher than Qt's score of 8.3. This suggests that users may find more responsive and helpful support when using RAD Studio.
- G2 users highlight that Qt's "Multi-Language Support" is rated at 8.1, which is slightly lower than RAD Studio's score of 8.3. This indicates that RAD Studio may provide a more robust experience for developers working in multiple programming languages.
- Users on G2 report that Qt's "Patching & Updates" feature is a point of concern, with a score of 6.5, indicating that users may experience challenges in keeping the software up to date. RAD Studio, on the other hand, has a better score of 7.7 in this area, suggesting a more reliable update process.
- Reviewers say that Qt shines in "Customization" with a score of 7.9, allowing users to tailor their development environment effectively. However, RAD Studio outperforms in this category with a score of 8.0, indicating slightly better options for customization.
- Users report that both products have similar scores in "Help Guides" at 8.3, but RAD Studio's overall user experience in documentation and community support is perceived as more comprehensive, which can be crucial for new users navigating the software.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Qt
No pricing availableRAD Studio
No pricing availableFree Trial
Qt
Free Trial is available
RAD Studio
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
45
8.8
11
Ease of Use
8.4
45
8.5
10
Ease of Setup
8.5
13
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.3
11
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
30
8.9
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
10
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.2
45
7.7
10
Features by Category
Python Integrated Development Environments (IDE)Hide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
6.5
8
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application Control
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
Platform - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advertising - App Monetization Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Mobile Development Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Qt and RAD Studio are categorized as C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)
Unique Categories
RAD Studio has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Qt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
RAD Studio
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
28.8%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Telecommunications
5.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.8%
Higher Education
5.8%
Other
46.2%
Computer Software
58.3%
Telecommunications
8.3%
Staffing and Recruiting
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Defense & Space
8.3%
Other
8.3%
Discussions
What are the primary benefits of QtCreator?
1 Comment
LR
QtCreator has many benefits:
+ It is stable mature software being continuously developed and maintained following best practices since 1995.
+ It has...Read more
What is the use of Qt Creator?
1 Comment
SP
It’s a multi-platform Développement IDE available for windows, Linux, macOS, android and others.Read more
Is Qt Creator IDE free?
1 Comment
SP
QT Creator is the development IDE, you can use the IDE however the QT libraries are only free for open source development which means if you use the open...Read more
RAD Studio has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
