# QMetry Test Management vs Tricentis qTest Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- According to verified reviews, **Tricentis qTest** stands out for its ability to **centralize test management** and provide seamless integration with tools like Jira, which enhances real-time visibility into test execution and defects, making collaboration between QA and development teams more effective.
- Users report that **QMetry Test Management** excels in **end-to-end testing** , allowing users to create comprehensive test suites that include multiple test cases, which can be easily executed and managed, thus streamlining the testing process.
- Reviewers mention that **Tricentis qTest** offers a significant advantage with its feature for **reusing test cases** , which saves time and improves quality by allowing teams to rerun tests effortlessly with each deployment.
- G2 reviewers highlight that **QMetry Test Management** provides a user-friendly experience for **uploading test cases** and executing them in test cycles, making it accessible for teams looking for straightforward test management solutions.
- Users say that while **Tricentis qTest** has a slightly lower score in **ease of setup** , it compensates with a robust feature set that includes effective test case management and integration capabilities, which are crucial for maintaining quality in software development.
- Reviewers note that **QMetry Test Management** has a strong focus on **integration** with various tools, such as JIRA for defect management and Jenkins for CI/CD, which enhances its utility in diverse development environments.



---
## Frequently Asked Questions

### What is the difference between Tricentis qTest vs QMetry Test Management?

Tricentis qTest stands out for its higher reviewer satisfaction and stronger integration capabilities, while QMetry Test Management is noted for its ease of setup and administration.

| | [Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-qtest/reviews) | [QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/products/qmetry-test-management/reviews) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| G2 Rating (reviews) | 4.3/5 (104 reviews) | 3.9/5 (38 reviews) |
| Largest Segment | Mid-Market | Enterprise |
| Ease of Setup score | 8.0 | 8.1 |
| Quality of Support score | 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | Integrations (10 all-time mentions) | — |



### How do the pricing models of Tricentis qTest and QMetry Test Management compare?

Tricentis qTest is rated higher for value, with a stronger Price/Cost satisfaction score than QMetry Test Management.

- **Tricentis qTest:** In recent reviews, several reviewers mention that the pricing is high but justified by the robust feature set and integration capabilities.
- **QMetry Test Management:** Reviewers note that cost and complexity are concerns, with some citing frequent price increases and value trade-offs for smaller teams.



### What are the best alternatives to Tricentis qTest and QMetry Test Management?

The top three alternatives to Tricentis qTest and QMetry Test Management are BrowserStack, OpenText Application Quality Management, and Zephyr Enterprise.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Tricentis qTest](https://www.g2.com/products/tricentis-qtest/reviews) | 4.3/5 (104 reviews) | Mid-Market | Pricing is high but justified by integrations | Integrations (10 all-time mentions) |
| [QMetry Test Management](https://www.g2.com/products/qmetry-test-management/reviews) | 3.9/5 (38 reviews) | Enterprise | Cost and complexity are concerns for some reviewers | — |
| [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) | 4.4/5 (3358 reviews) | Small-Business | — | — |
| [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews) | 4.0/5 (133 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews) | 4.1/5 (80 reviews) | Small-Business | — | — |



### Which Software Testing features should I prioritize when comparing Tricentis qTest and QMetry Test Management?

Buyers should prioritize integrations, ease of use, test case management, reporting, and automation support when comparing Tricentis qTest and QMetry Test Management.

- **Integrations:** Tricentis qTest: 10 all-time mentions; QMetry Test Management: 16 all-time mentions for Jira integration.
- **Ease of Use:** Tricentis qTest: 8.4; QMetry Test Management: 6.9.
- **Test Case Management:** Tricentis qTest: 6 all-time mentions; QMetry Test Management: reviewers highlight organization and traceability.
- **Reporting:** Tricentis qTest: 4 all-time mentions of reporting limitations; QMetry Test Management: reviewers cite customizable dashboards and system reports.
- **Automation Support:** Tricentis qTest: 2 all-time mentions; QMetry Test Management: reviewers note QMetry Automation Studio and support for Selenium/Appium.



### What are the pros and cons of Tricentis qTest vs QMetry Test Management?

Tricentis qTest's headline strength is its integration capabilities, while QMetry Test Management is noted for ease of setup and customizable reporting.

- **Tricentis qTest strengths:** Integrations (10 all-time mentions), Jira integration (9), ease of use (8), organization (8), real-time updates (3), team collaboration (3).
- **Tricentis qTest trade-offs:** Slow performance (6), poor UI (5), limited reporting (4), integration setup complexity (3), setup difficulty (3).
- **QMetry Test Management strengths:** Reviewers highlight ease of setup, customizable dashboards, strong Jira integration, and automation support with Selenium/Appium.
- **QMetry Test Management trade-offs:** Reviewers note cost and complexity concerns, a steeper learning curve for advanced features, and some UI limitations.



### Is Tricentis qTest or QMetry Test Management better for small businesses?

BrowserStack is the leading alternative for small businesses, while Tricentis qTest and QMetry Test Management are more commonly used in mid-market and enterprise segments.

- **Tricentis qTest:** Largest reviewer segment is Mid-Market; reviewers highlight robust integrations and centralized test management but note higher pricing as a barrier for smaller organizations.
- **QMetry Test Management:** Largest reviewer segment is Enterprise; reviewers mention that the tool can be heavy for smaller companies and cite cost and complexity as trade-offs.



### Which Software Testing platform has better integrations?

Tricentis qTest is favored by reviewers for integrations, especially with Jira and other third-party tools.

- **Tricentis qTest:** Jira (38 all-time mentions), Azure Pipelines, ReadyAPI; integrations cited in 10 all-time mentions.
- **QMetry Test Management:** Jira (16 all-time mentions); reviewers also mention Jenkins, GitHub, and Bamboo integration.



### How do Tricentis qTest and QMetry Test Management compare on customer support?

Tricentis qTest and QMetry Test Management score within 0.2 points on Quality of Support, indicating near parity (8.4 vs 8.2).

- **Tricentis qTest:** Reviewers consistently praise responsive customer support, periodic training sessions, and technical assistance, with several citing support as a differentiator.
- **QMetry Test Management:** Reviewers describe support as helpful and responsive, with positive experiences noted for onboarding and troubleshooting, though some mention documentation gaps.



### Which is easier to implement, Tricentis qTest or QMetry Test Management?

QMetry Test Management and Tricentis qTest score within 0.2 points on Ease of Setup (8.1 vs 8.0), indicating parity.

- **Tricentis qTest:** Reviewers describe setup as straightforward but note a learning curve for advanced integrations and initial configuration.
- **QMetry Test Management:** Reviewers highlight easy implementation and user-friendly onboarding, with some mentioning that setup is efficient for both manual and automated testing workflows.



### Which product has better Integration?

Tricentis qTest is rated higher for Integration, with more reviewer-cited integration strengths and higher all-time mention counts.

- **Tricentis qTest:** Integration is the top reviewer-cited feature (10 all-time mentions), with Jira integration (9), and additional mentions for Azure Pipelines and ReadyAPI.
- **QMetry Test Management:** Jira integration (16 all-time mentions), with reviewers also noting Jenkins, GitHub, and Bamboo integration.



| | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 3.9 out of 5 | 4.3 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 38 | 104 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (38.9% of reviews) | Mid-Market (46.0% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | No pricing available | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### QMetry Test Management

**Not enough data**

### Tricentis qTest

Pros:
- Integrations (10 reviews)
- Jira Integration (9 reviews)

Cons:
- Slow Performance (6 reviews)
- Poor UI (5 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 8.0 (30 reviews) | 8.4 (76 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 6.9 (30 reviews) | 8.4 (78 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 8.1 (14 reviews) | 8.0 (41 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 8.2 (13 reviews) | 7.9 (21 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 8.2 (24 reviews) | 8.4 (74 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 8.6 (11 reviews) | 8.3 (22 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 4.9 (30 reviews) | 9.2 (83 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### QMetry Test Management

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

### Tricentis qTest

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Artificial Intelligence

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **QMetry Test Management** | N/A | N/A |
| **Tricentis qTest** | N/A | N/A |

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Tagging** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Processing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Extraction** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multi-Language** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Predictive Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Speech Recognition** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Storage Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Virtual Personal Assistant (VPA)** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customer Segmentation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **For eCommerce** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Role-Based Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Branding** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Search/Filter** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Monitoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Document Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Visualization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Trend Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Machine Learning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Alerts/Escalation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Performance Metrics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Data** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Third-Party Integrations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Mobile App** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multiple Data Sources** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **For Sales Teams/Organizations** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Sentiment Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Chatbot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Automation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Generative AI

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **QMetry Test Management** | N/A | N/A |
| **Tricentis qTest** | N/A | N/A |

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Code Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Text to Image** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Processing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Virtual Characters and Avatars** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Content Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Personalization and Recommendation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Conditional Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Transformer Model** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Automated Image & Video Editing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Interactive and Co-Creative Systems** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Text Summarization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Augmentation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Variation Autoencoder Models** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Adversarial Training** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Transfer Learning and Fine-tuning** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Simulation and Scenario Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Creative Design** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Prompt Engineering** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Foundation Model** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Test Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **QMetry Test Management** | 8.5/10 | 13 |
| **Tricentis qTest** | 8.3/10 | 34 |

#### Functionality

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Test Repository** | 8.8 (12 reviews) | 8.8 (30 reviews) | 
| **Integration** | 9.2 (12 reviews) | 7.9 (32 reviews) | 
| **Test Diversity** | 8.3 (10 reviews) | 8.5 (29 reviews) | 

#### Management

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Reporting** | 8.2 (12 reviews) | 8.3 (29 reviews) | 
| **Version Control** | 8.3 (9 reviews) | 8.3 (28 reviews) | 
| **Scaling** | 8.0 (11 reviews) | 8.2 (28 reviews) | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Commenting/Notes** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Approval Workflow** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Task Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Case Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Quality Assurance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Risk Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Access Controls/Permissions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Testing Scripts** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Templates** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Fields** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Audit Trail** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Issue Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Automated Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Traceability** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Prioritization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Alerts/Notifications** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Single Sign On** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Milestone Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting/Analytics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Repository Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Multiple Test Types** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Parameterized Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Run Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Defect Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Screen Capture** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Automation Testing

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **QMetry Test Management** | N/A | N/A |
| **Tricentis qTest** | 8.9/10 | 16 |

#### Functionality 

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Test Feedback** | Not enough data | 9.1 (15 reviews) | 
| **Test History** | Not enough data | 9.0 (16 reviews) | 
| **Customization** | Not enough data | 8.5 (16 reviews) | 
| **Test Variety** | Not enough data | 9.2 (15 reviews) | 

#### Automation

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Organization** | Not enough data | 9.1 (15 reviews) | 
| **Reliability** | Not enough data | 9.0 (15 reviews) | 
| **Thoroughness** | Not enough data | 8.8 (15 reviews) | 

#### Agentic AI - Automation Testing

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Supports Parallel Execution** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Additional Functionality

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Assessment Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Reporting & Statistics** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Security Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Parameterized Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Visualization** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Import/Export** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI Copilot** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **API** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Unicode Compliance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Monitoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Performance Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Issue Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Performance Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Bug Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Compliance Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Move & Copy** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Hierarchical View** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **User Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Software Testing Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Model-Based Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Dashboard** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Issue Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Quality Assurance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Version Control** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Activity Tracking** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Extraction** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Static Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Requirements-Based Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Real-Time Monitoring** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Customizable Reports** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **A/B Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Alerts/Notifications** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Action-Word Testing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Script Reviews** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Data Storage Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Workflow Management** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Generative AI** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Collaboration Tools** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Drag & Drop** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

### Software Testing

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **QMetry Test Management** | N/A | N/A |
| **Tricentis qTest** | 7.5/10 | 11 |

#### Agentic AI - Software Testing

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | 7.9 (11 reviews) | 
| **Natural Language Interaction** | Not enough data | 7.5 (10 reviews) | 
| **Proactive Assistance** | Not enough data | 7.0 (10 reviews) | 

### AI Software Testing Tools

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **QMetry Test Management** | N/A | N/A |
| **Tricentis qTest** | N/A | N/A |

#### AI Test Generation & Authoring

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **UI-Based Test Generation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Natural Language Test Creation** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Test Coverage Suggestions** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Test Maintenance & Resilience 

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Self-healing** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Dynamic Element Locators** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **AI-Powered Test Maintenance** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

#### Execution & Analytics

| Feature | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Intelligent Reporting** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Visual Anomaly Detection** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 
| **Root Cause Analysis** | Not enough data | Not enough data | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (3):** [Test Management Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/test-management), [Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing), [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing-tools)


**Unique to Tricentis qTest (1):** [AI Software Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-software-testing-tools)


---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | QMetry Test Management | Tricentis qTest | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 27.8% | 28.0% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 33.3% | 46.0% | 
| **Enterprise** | 38.9% | 26.0% | 

### By Industry

#### QMetry Test Management

- **Computer Software:** 25.0%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 19.4%
- **Information Services:** 19.4%
- **Financial Services:** 13.9%
- **Telecommunications:** 5.6%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 5.6%
- **Consumer Services:** 2.8%
- **Consumer Goods:** 2.8%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 2.8%
- **Banking:** 2.8%

#### Tricentis qTest

- **Information Technology and Services:** 27.0%
- **Computer Software:** 25.0%
- **Financial Services:** 7.0%
- **Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing:** 5.0%
- **Health, Wellness and Fitness:** 4.0%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 4.0%
- **Airlines/Aviation:** 3.0%
- **Banking:** 3.0%
- **E-Learning:** 3.0%
- **Internet:** 2.0%
- **Other:** 17.0%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to QMetry Test Management

- [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (80 reviews)
- [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/products/testrail/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (610 reviews)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (133 reviews)
- [Katalon](https://www.g2.com/products/katalon/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (228 reviews)
- [TestLink](https://www.g2.com/products/testlink/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (61 reviews)
- [PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/products/practitest/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (235 reviews)
- [Cypress](https://www.g2.com/products/cypress/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (107 reviews)
- [Qase](https://www.g2.com/products/qase/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (313 reviews)
- [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (3360 reviews)
- [Tuskr](https://www.g2.com/products/tuskr/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (661 reviews)

### Alternatives to Tricentis qTest

- [BrowserStack](https://www.g2.com/products/browserstack/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (3360 reviews)
- [OpenText Application Quality Management](https://www.g2.com/products/opentext-application-quality-management/reviews) — 4.0/5 stars (133 reviews)
- [Zephyr Enterprise](https://www.g2.com/products/zephyr-enterprise/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (80 reviews)
- [TestRail](https://www.g2.com/products/testrail/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (610 reviews)
- [PractiTest](https://www.g2.com/products/practitest/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (235 reviews)
- [TestLink](https://www.g2.com/products/testlink/reviews) — 4.4/5 stars (61 reviews)
- [Panaya Smart Testing and Change Intelligence](https://www.g2.com/products/panaya-smart-testing-and-change-intelligence/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (541 reviews)
- [Xray Test Management](https://www.g2.com/products/xray-test-management/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (19 reviews)
- [Qase](https://www.g2.com/products/qase/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (313 reviews)
- [Ranorex Studio](https://www.g2.com/products/ranorex-studio/reviews) — 4.2/5 stars (258 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### QMetry Test Management

- Title: [1. How can I link incidents automatically? 2. Is it possible to get the count of the number of times an incident is returned to development?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/24407-1-como-puedo-enlazar-incidencias-automaticamente-2-es-posible-obtener-el-conteo-del-numero-de-veces-que-se-devuelve-una-incidencia-a-desarrollo) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "1. [English Translated Question] It is possible that when reporting a bug in a TestRun, it is automatically linked to the TestRun where it was reported, we..."

### Tricentis qTest

- Title: [What is Tricentis qTest used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-tricentis-qtest-used-for) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "Tricentis qTest is used for managing software testing and making it easier for teams to track tests. It helps you plan, organize, and see the results of..."
- Title: [What is Waldo software?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-waldo-software) — 1 comment
  > **Top comment:** "Waldo helps you to reinvent your mobile development process by empowering your mobile developers to create script-less end-to-end tests to fix bugs during..."
- Title: [is qtest a web-based tool?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/6267-is-qtest-a-web-based-tool) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Yes.  It can be on prem or SaaS, but the interface is all web-based.  "
- Title: [On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt.  How does QASymphony fit into our success?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/on-boarding-training-and-continued-support-is-a-must-have-for-any-tool-we-adopt-how-does-qasymphony-fit-into-our-success) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board. 

Check out our customer info..."
- Title: [We have data in HP QC or another test management solution, how can I migrate my data to qTest?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2266-we-have-data-in-hp-qc-or-another-test-management-solution-how-can-i-migrate-my-data-to-qtest) — 1 comment, 1 upvote
  > **Top comment:** "Take a look on our website on how it works and get in contact with us. 

https://www.qasymphony.com/hpqc-how-it-works/"

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/qmetry-test-management-vs-tricentis-qtest)