When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found them equally easy to use. However, TimeXtender is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with TimeXtender overall.
Reviewers felt that TimeXtender meets the needs of their business better than Qlik Replicate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that TimeXtender is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of TimeXtender over Qlik Replicate.
Hi Ricardo, Thanks for your comment. Please contact your local Qlik representative to arrange a product roadmap discussion. If you have any issue please...Read more
How much does Attunity Replicate cost?
1 Comment
TH
That will depend on how many endpoint licenses you will need (source and target). Qlik will negotiate so treat the list price as an opening bid and work with...Read more
Qlik Replicate has no more discussions with answers
ODX (Operational Data Exchange) is a instance where you can build your data base connection, and Transfer Data From source to ODX and also it Reads the...Read more
Why use TimeXtender?
1 Comment
G2
Accelerate Azure Synapse Analytics
TimeXtender accelerates the creation, deployment and management of a complete modern data estate on Azure Synapse...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.