Link copied to clipboard # Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/qlik-replicate/shareplex/export.csv) Qlik ReplicateSharePlex[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Qlik Replicate** **Contact Sales** ยท Qlik Data Integration for CDC Streaming **SharePlex** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **Qlik Replicate** $$$$$ **SharePlex** $$$$$ Average Discount **Qlik Replicate** Not enough reviews yet **SharePlex** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **Qlik Replicate** 6 months Based on 100 responses **SharePlex** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **Qlik Replicate** 6 months Based on 100 responses **SharePlex** 6 months Based on 100 responses **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Qlik Replicate** Features (3) Database Management (2) Complex Setup (2) Learning Difficulty (2) **SharePlex** Data Transformation (1) Easy Integrations (1) Coding Challenges (1) Complexity (1) Screenshots **Qlik Replicate** ![Qlik Replicate screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/133136/Replicate-Guide-6.1.png) **SharePlex** No screenshot available **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Qlik Replicate** **8.1** /10 Based on 66 responses **SharePlex** **8.7** /10 Based on 15 responses Ease of Use **Qlik Replicate** **8.4** /10 Based on 67 responses **SharePlex** **8.7** /10 Based on 15 responses Ease of Setup **Qlik Replicate** **7.9** /10 Based on 42 responses **SharePlex** **8.8** /10 Based on 11 responses Ease of Admin **Qlik Replicate** **8.0** /10 Based on 40 responses **SharePlex** **7.6** /10 Based on 11 responses Quality of Support **Qlik Replicate** **8.0** /10 Based on 61 responses **SharePlex** **8.7** /10 Based on 15 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Qlik Replicate** **8.3** /10 Based on 40 responses **SharePlex** **8.5** /10 Based on 11 responses Product Direction (% positive) **Qlik Replicate** **7.2** /10 Based on 55 responses **SharePlex** **7.7** /10 Based on 15 responses **Features** ratings from reviews ETL Tools **8.1** /10 Based on 31 responses Not enough data Data Replication **8.1** /10 Based on 50 responses Not enough data User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 20.2% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 34.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 45.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 20.2% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 34.0% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 45.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 18.2% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 22.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 59.1% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 18.2% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 22.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 59.1% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Qlik Replicate](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/98e80bea04e66b93e3f2ce721286e85c/qlik-replicate.svg "Qlik Replicate")](https://www.g2.com/products/qlik-replicate/reviews) Qlik Replicate Information Technology and Services 10.6% Banking 9.6% Automotive 6.4% Computer Software 5.3% Retail 5.3% Other 62.8% [![SharePlex](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1556231686/shareplex.svg "SharePlex")](https://www.g2.com/products/shareplex/reviews) SharePlex Information Technology and Services 18.2% Education Management 13.6% Computer Software 9.1% Utilities 4.5% Telecommunications 4.5% Other 50.0% Alternatives **Qlik Replicate Alternatives** ![Fivetran](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1526948884/fivetran.svg "Fivetran") [ Fivetran ](/products/fivetran/reviews) ![Hevo Data](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1a4069c8ee36ae34c4c9c55aeea3a96d/hevo-data.svg "Hevo Data") [ Hevo Data ](/products/hevo-data/reviews) ![Azure Data Factory](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_f176b4154a751d10150daa67a57b7dc5/azure-data-factory.jpg "Azure Data Factory") [ Azure Data Factory ](/products/azure-data-factory/reviews) ![AWS Database Migration Service](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1528476503/aws-database-migration-service.svg "AWS Database Migration Service") [ AWS Database Migration Service ](/products/aws-database-migration-service/reviews) **SharePlex Alternatives** ![Oracle GoldenGate](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1543621403/oracle-goldengate.svg "Oracle GoldenGate") [ Oracle ](/products/oracle-goldengate/reviews) ![Veeam Data Platform](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a179f521693e62ccbdd5f80b4da072ec/veeam-data-platform.svg "Veeam Data Platform") [ Veeam Data Platform ](/products/veeam-data-platform/reviews) ![Microsoft SQL Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a8a99a96fda235658139f710592f8a53/microsoft-sql-server.svg "Microsoft SQL Server") [ MS SQL ](/products/microsoft-sql-server/reviews) ![Fivetran](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1526948884/fivetran.svg "Fivetran") [ Fivetran ](/products/fivetran/reviews) ## Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 15, 2026 ### What is the difference between SharePlex vs Qlik Replicate? SharePlex and Qlik Replicate are both highly rated for on-premise data integration, but SharePlex stands out for its reliability and efficiency in real-time replication, while Qlik Replicate is noted for its broad integration support and user-friendly interface. | [SharePlex](https://www.g2.com/products/shareplex/reviews) | [Qlik Replicate](https://www.g2.com/products/qlik-replicate/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.3/5 (23 reviews) | 4.3/5 (110 reviews) | | Enterprise | Enterprise | | 8.8 | 7.9 | | 8.7 | 8.0 | | Reliability and efficiency in real-time replication | Broad integration support and user-friendly interface | ### How do the pricing models of SharePlex and Qlik Replicate compare? SharePlex is rated higher for value, with a stronger Price/Cost satisfaction score than Qlik Replicate. - **SharePlex:** Reviewers highlight its lower cost of ownership and strong return on investment, with several noting it is half the price of other popular solutions. - **Qlik Replicate:** Recent reviews mention that Qlik Replicate is "slightly on the higher side" in pricing, and some cite the need for extra licenses for each source-endpoint as a drawback. - **Switching reasons:** Reviewers have moved to SharePlex for its cost-effectiveness and reliability in large-scale enterprise environments. ### What are the best alternatives to SharePlex and Qlik Replicate? The top three alternatives to SharePlex and Qlik Replicate are Fivetran, Oracle GoldenGate, and Azure Data Factory. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [SharePlex](https://www.g2.com/products/shareplex/reviews) | 4.3/5 (23) | Enterprise | Lower cost of ownership, strong ROI | Reliability and efficiency in real-time replication | | [Qlik Replicate](https://www.g2.com/products/qlik-replicate/reviews) | 4.3/5 (110) | Enterprise | Pricing is higher, extra license for each source-endpoint | Broad integration support and user-friendly interface | | [Fivetran](https://www.g2.com/products/fivetran/reviews) | 4.3/5 (828) | Mid-Market | โ€” | Automated data integration and connectors | | [Oracle](https://www.g2.com/products/oracle-goldengate/reviews) | 3.9/5 (34) | Enterprise | โ€” | Enterprise-grade replication for Oracle environments | | [Azure Data Factory](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-data-factory/reviews) | 4.6/5 (101) | Enterprise | โ€” | Cloud-based data integration and orchestration | ### Which On-Premise Data Integration features should I prioritize when comparing SharePlex and Qlik Replicate? Buyers should prioritize real-time replication, ease of setup, integration breadth, reliability, and support quality when comparing SharePlex and Qlik Replicate. - **Real-time replication:** SharePlex (all-time mention: 1), Qlik Replicate (recent reviews highlight log-based CDC and real-time analytics). - **Ease of setup:** SharePlex 8.8, Qlik Replicate 7.9. - **Integration breadth:** Qlik Replicate supports over 40 source systems and 60+ targets; SharePlex is praised for flexibility but with fewer explicit integration mentions. - **Reliability:** SharePlex (all-time mention: 1), Qlik Replicate (recent reviews highlight reliability and data consistency). - **Support quality:** SharePlex 8.7, Qlik Replicate 8.0. ### What are the pros and cons of SharePlex vs Qlik Replicate? SharePlex's headline strength is reliability and efficiency in real-time replication, while Qlik Replicate excels in integration breadth and user-friendly design. - **SharePlex strengths:** Reliability (all-time mention: 1), efficiency (1), flexibility (1), simple configuration (1), robust conflict resolution (1), low overhead (1). - **SharePlex trade-offs:** Complex setup (1), technical knowledge requirement (1), limited advanced transformation features (1), documentation could be improved (1), less intuitive UI (1). - **Qlik Replicate strengths:** Broad integration support (recent reviews cite 40+ sources, 60+ targets), user-friendly drag-and-drop interface (recent reviews), robust data validation (recent reviews), scalability (2), automation (1), real-time analytics (recent reviews). - **Qlik Replicate trade-offs:** Higher pricing (recent reviews), complex setup for advanced configurations (2), learning curve for new users (2), support for small-scale enterprises could be improved (recent reviews). ### Is SharePlex or Qlik Replicate better for small businesses? Neither SharePlex nor Qlik Replicate is primarily targeted at small businesses, as both have Enterprise as their largest reviewer segment. - **SharePlex:** Enterprise segment; reviewers highlight its value for large-scale, high-availability environments, with minimal mention of small-business use cases. - **Qlik Replicate:** Enterprise segment; reviewers note its broad integration capabilities and scalability, but also mention that support for small-scale enterprises could be improved. ### Which On-Premise Data Integration platform has better integrations? Qlik Replicate is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing its support for over 40 source systems and 60+ targets. - **SharePlex:** Reviewers mention easy integrations in recent reviews, but with fewer explicit integration mentions and no specific third-party tools named. - **Qlik Replicate:** Recent reviews highlight integration with SAP, Salesforce, Snowflake, and Kafka, with broad support for enterprise endpoints and cloud platforms. ### How do SharePlex and Qlik Replicate compare on customer support? SharePlex and Qlik Replicate are rated closely on Quality of Support, with SharePlex at 8.7 and Qlik Replicate at 8.0, indicating near parity. - **SharePlex:** Reviewers consistently praise responsive and knowledgeable support teams, with several citing immediate assistance and effective problem resolution. - **Qlik Replicate:** Reviewers describe support as generally reliable, though some mention variability in response times and expertise, with recent improvements noted. ### Which is easier to implement, SharePlex or Qlik Replicate? SharePlex scores higher on Ease of Setup (8.8 vs. 7.9), making it easier to implement than Qlik Replicate. - **SharePlex:** Reviewers highlight quick installation, simple configuration for standard use cases, and minimal downtime during setup, though complex environments may require technical expertise. - **Qlik Replicate:** Reviewers note a user-friendly interface but mention that initial setup can be time-consuming due to system requirements and a learning curve for advanced configurations. ### Which product has better Reporting? Qlik Replicate is favored for Reporting, as reviewers highlight its real-time analytics and reporting capabilities. - **SharePlex:** Reviewers mention using SharePlex to provide reporting databases and offload OLTP instances, but do not cite advanced reporting features. - **Qlik Replicate:** Recent reviews highlight real-time analytics, central management console for monitoring, and reporting use cases, with several reviewers citing its effectiveness for data reporting and ETL workflows. ## Qlik Replicate vs SharePlex When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found SharePlex easier to use, set up, and do business with overall. However, reviewers preferred the ease of administration with Qlik Replicate. - Reviewers felt that SharePlex meets the needs of their business better than Qlik Replicate. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that SharePlex is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of SharePlex over Qlik Replicate.