Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Qdrant and SingleStore

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Qdrant
Qdrant
Star Rating
(12)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Qdrant
SingleStore
SingleStore
Star Rating
(118)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.7% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SingleStore
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Reviews say that SingleStore excels in its ability to handle large-scale data workloads efficiently, with users highlighting its "distributed SQL" capabilities as a standout feature. In contrast, users report that Qdrant shines in vector similarity search, making it particularly effective for AI and machine learning applications.
  • Users on G2 mention that SingleStore has a slightly steeper learning curve, reflected in its Ease of Use score of 8.7, while Qdrant's score of 9.1 indicates a more user-friendly experience, especially for those new to database management.
  • Reviewers mention that SingleStore's Ease of Setup score of 8.4 suggests some complexity in initial configuration, whereas Qdrant's score of 9.2 indicates a more straightforward setup process, which users appreciate for quick deployment.
  • Users report that SingleStore's Quality of Support score of 8.7 is commendable, with many praising the responsiveness of the support team. In comparison, Qdrant's score of 8.5 shows it also provides good support, but some users feel it could be more comprehensive.
  • G2 users highlight that SingleStore has been a reliable partner in business, reflected in its score of 8.8 for being a good business partner, while Qdrant lacks this specific score, indicating less feedback on partnership experiences.
  • Reviewers mention that Qdrant's Product Direction score of 10.0 is impressive, with users expressing confidence in its future developments, while SingleStore's score of 8.6 shows it is also on a positive trajectory but may not inspire the same level of enthusiasm.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Qdrant
No pricing available
SingleStore
No pricing available
Free Trial
Qdrant
No trial information available
SingleStore
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
11
8.9
99
Ease of Use
9.1
11
8.7
98
Ease of Setup
9.2
11
8.4
59
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.1
58
Quality of Support
8.5
9
8.7
90
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
52
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
11
8.6
89
Features by Category
Not enough data
9.0
81
Management
Not enough data
9.3
28
Not enough data
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Support
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.8
18
Security
Not enough data
8.5
19
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.9
20
Performance
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
9.0
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
9.1
24
Database Features
Not enough data
9.0
70
Not enough data
9.2
69
Not enough data
8.9
69
Not enough data
9.1
68
Not enough data
8.9
61
Not enough data
8.8
66
Not enough data
9.1
70
9.0
10
Not enough data
Data Indexing
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.5
10
Not enough data
Filters
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
Real-time Analytic DatabaseHide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Qdrant
Qdrant
SingleStore
SingleStore
Qdrant and SingleStore are categorized as Vector Database
Unique Categories
Qdrant
Qdrant has no unique categories
SingleStore
SingleStore is categorized as Real-time Analytic Database and Relational Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Qdrant
Qdrant
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
58.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
8.3%
SingleStore
SingleStore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
37.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
37.7%
Reviewers' Industry
Qdrant
Qdrant
Manufacturing
16.7%
E-Learning
16.7%
Computer & Network Security
16.7%
Marketing and Advertising
8.3%
Market Research
8.3%
Other
33.3%
SingleStore
SingleStore
Information Technology and Services
21.9%
Computer Software
18.4%
Financial Services
12.3%
Internet
7.0%
Banking
6.1%
Other
34.2%
Alternatives
Qdrant
Qdrant Alternatives
Supabase
Supabase
Add Supabase
Elasticsearch
Elasticsearch
Add Elasticsearch
Weaviate
Weaviate
Add Weaviate
Pinecone
Pinecone
Add Pinecone
SingleStore
SingleStore Alternatives
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Add PostgreSQL
CockroachDB
CockroachDB
Add CockroachDB
MySQL
MySQL
Add MySQL
Microsoft SQL Server
MS SQL
Add Microsoft SQL Server
Discussions
Qdrant
Qdrant Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Qdrant has no discussions with answers
SingleStore
SingleStore Discussions
What is the relationship between MemSQL and MySQL?
2 Comments
Lisa L.
LL
In fact, mysql is the best tool for working with a database. Therefore, I advise you to go to the site https://www.devart.com/dbforge/mysql/studio/ and...Read more
How to simplify scaling of MemSQL cluster?
1 Comment
FS
This question does seem particularly pertinent to microservices, as you are more likely to have multiple data stores. There are several parts to the answer....Read more
Can we Use Amazon Kinesis to ingest data into memsql
1 Comment
FS
The answer should certainly be yes, for most use cases. Kinesis is mentioned in this blog post: https://www.memsql.com/content/kafka/. For specifics, please...Read more