Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Qase and mabl 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
Contact Us Per Year
Qase
Star Rating
(270)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansmabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mablSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that mabl excels in user experience, with many praising its intuitive UX design that makes onboarding smooth. Users appreciate how the UI is closely connected across different test types, which enhances usability and reduces the learning curve.
- Users say Qase stands out for its effective AI test management capabilities, which significantly streamline the process of checking project quality. Reviewers highlight its efficiency in delivering reliable results, making it a strong choice for teams focused on quality assurance.
- According to verified reviews, mabl's implementation process is notably simple, with users noting that creating automated tests is easy even for non-technical team members. This accessibility is a key advantage for teams looking to adopt automation without extensive technical expertise.
- Reviewers mention that Qase's interface is reminiscent of Jira, which facilitates a smoother onboarding experience for new users. The responsive customer service is also frequently highlighted, ensuring that teams receive timely support during their initial setup and beyond.
- G2 reviewers indicate that while mabl has a strong focus on user experience, it currently has fewer recent reviews compared to Qase, which may suggest a need for more user engagement or updates. This could impact the perception of its ongoing support and development.
- Users report that Qase has a higher overall satisfaction score, particularly in areas like quality of support and ease of setup. This suggests that teams looking for robust support and a straightforward implementation process may find Qase to be a more reliable option.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Qase
Free
$0.00
For students, small projects, and non-profits.
- Up to 3 users
- 500Mb for attachments
- Test case management
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Pricing is customized to your test coverage and scalability needs.
- Your pricing session will include:
- A custom quote
- ROI analysis
Free Trial
Qase
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
242
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.3
246
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
9.3
176
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
9.3
110
9.0
5
Quality of Support
9.6
224
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
96
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
243
8.7
26
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.4
178
Not enough data
8.3
164
Not enough data
9.1
172
Not enough data
Management
8.7
173
Not enough data
8.3
163
Not enough data
8.7
163
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
82
9.1
17
8.9
83
9.2
17
8.5
82
8.8
17
8.9
82
8.5
17
Automation
8.9
80
8.3
16
Feature Not Available
9.0
17
Feature Not Available
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.3
11
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Qase and mabl are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Qase is categorized as Test Management
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools and AI Software Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Qase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.7%
Information Technology and Services
15.9%
Financial Services
6.1%
Program Development
3.8%
Hospital & Health Care
3.0%
Other
37.5%
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Qase?
2 Comments
GR
Qase is a test management tool.Read more
Qase has no more discussions with answers
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs.
It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
