Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare QA Wolf and Virtuoso QA 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 9999 Tests
No pricing available
QA Wolf
Star Rating
(174)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 9999 Tests
Learn more about QA WolfVirtuoso QA
Star Rating
(116)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Virtuoso QASummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Virtuoso QA has a solid test feedback mechanism, scoring 8.7, but QA Wolf excels with a score of 9.4, indicating a more effective way to gather and analyze test results.
- Reviewers mention that while Virtuoso QA offers decent test history tracking at 8.7, QA Wolf's score of 9.1 suggests a more comprehensive approach to maintaining and reviewing past test data.
- G2 users highlight that Virtuoso QA's customization options are somewhat limited with a score of 8.1, whereas QA Wolf shines in this area with a score of 8.7, allowing for more tailored testing experiences.
- Users on G2 say that Virtuoso QA's test variety is adequate at 8.4, but QA Wolf stands out with a score of 9.3, providing a broader range of testing types and scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that Virtuoso QA's reliability is rated at 8.6, which is good, but QA Wolf's higher score of 9.2 indicates a more dependable performance in automated testing environments.
- Users report that Virtuoso QA's thoroughness in testing is rated at 8.4, while QA Wolf's score of 9.4 reflects a more meticulous approach, ensuring that tests cover all necessary aspects effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
QA Wolf
Zero-effort automated QA
Contact Us
9999 Tests
We get you to 80% end-to-end test coverage in 4 months — and keep you there. No matter how many tests your web app needs, you'll get unlimited, parallel test runs on our infrastructure. Even better, we guarantee zero flakes. It’s like magic but it’s QA Wolf.
- Unlimited, parallel test runs
- Hosted parallel run infrastructure included
- Guaranteed zero flakes
Virtuoso QA
No pricing availableFree Trial
QA Wolf
No trial information availableVirtuoso QA
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
167
8.5
90
Ease of Use
9.2
169
8.9
93
Ease of Setup
9.2
101
8.6
37
Ease of Admin
9.3
59
8.1
24
Quality of Support
9.9
167
8.7
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.8
60
8.4
24
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
168
9.4
93
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.4
103
8.6
59
9.3
103
8.7
61
8.7
101
8.1
59
9.3
102
8.4
58
Automation
9.5
102
8.7
55
9.3
101
8.6
60
9.4
101
8.4
58
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
7.8
9
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.5
18
Not enough data
6.6
16
Not enough data
7.1
16
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
QA Wolf and Virtuoso QA are categorized as Automation Testing and AI Software Testing Tools
Unique Categories
QA Wolf is categorized as Software Testing and Mobile App Testing
Virtuoso QA has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
QA Wolf
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Virtuoso QA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
41.0%
Marketing and Advertising
6.9%
Automotive
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.6%
Information Technology and Services
3.5%
Other
38.7%
Information Technology and Services
23.5%
Computer Software
21.7%
Retail
4.3%
Financial Services
4.3%
Apparel & Fashion
3.5%
Other
42.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
QA Wolf has no discussions with answers
Virtuoso QA has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
