Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare QA Wolf and mabl

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
Star Rating
(175)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (56.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 9999 Tests
Learn more about QA Wolf
mabl
mabl
Star Rating
(38)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mabl
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that QA Wolf excels in providing high-quality, maintainable end-to-end tests that effectively replace manual regression testing. Users appreciate the strong communication and partnership mindset of the QA Wolf team, which feels like an extension of their QA/QE organization.
  • Users say mabl offers a smooth introduction to automated testing, with its great UX design making it easy for non-technical users to create automated tests. Reviewers highlight the intuitive interface and quick deployment of frontend and API tests, which significantly speeds up the testing process.
  • According to verified reviews, QA Wolf stands out for its proactive approach in identifying and reporting bugs early in the software development lifecycle. This level of communication has helped users avoid shipping important regressions, showcasing the product's reliability and thoroughness.
  • Reviewers mention that mabl's integration and implementation process is straightforward, with clear documentation and helpful resources. Users appreciate the ease of creating automated tests from end to end, making it accessible even for those without a technical background.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that QA Wolf's test quality is consistently high, with users noting that the team has helped them transition from zero to sixty in automated end-to-end testing. This partnership approach has been crucial for organizations looking to optimize their testing processes.
  • Users report that while mabl has a solid user experience, QA Wolf's overall satisfaction ratings are higher, indicating a stronger market presence and user trust. The feedback suggests that QA Wolf's commitment to quality and support is a significant factor in its success among users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
QA Wolf
Zero-effort automated QA
Contact Us
9999 Tests
Learn more about QA Wolf
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Learn more about mabl
Free Trial
QA Wolf
No trial information available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
169
8.6
28
Ease of Use
9.2
171
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
9.2
102
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
9.3
60
9.0
5
Quality of Support
9.9
169
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.8
61
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
169
8.7
26
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.6
104
9.0
18
Functionality
9.4
104
9.1
17
9.3
103
9.2
17
8.7
101
8.8
17
9.3
102
8.5
17
Automation
9.5
102
8.3
16
9.3
102
9.0
17
9.4
102
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
7.8
9
Not enough data
6.3
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.2
19
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
7.6
19
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
7.3
17
Not enough data
AI Software Testing ToolsHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
mabl
mabl
QA Wolf and mabl are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Unique Categories
QA Wolf
QA Wolf is categorized as Mobile App Testing
mabl
mabl is categorized as Load Testing Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
43.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
56.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
0.6%
mabl
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
44.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
19.4%
Reviewers' Industry
QA Wolf
QA Wolf
Computer Software
40.6%
Marketing and Advertising
6.9%
Automotive
5.1%
Hospital & Health Care
4.6%
Information Technology and Services
3.4%
Other
39.4%
mabl
mabl
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
QA Wolf
QA Wolf Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
Tuskr
Tuskr
Add Tuskr
UiPath Agentic Automation
UiPath Agentic Automation
Add UiPath Agentic Automation
mabl
mabl Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Tricentis Testim
Tricentis Testim
Add Tricentis Testim
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Discussions
QA Wolf
QA Wolf Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
QA Wolf has no discussions with answers
mabl
mabl Discussions
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
Cindy S.
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs. It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more