Reviewers mention that PureBasic excels in its cross-platform support, achieving a score of 9.8, which allows users to develop applications that run on multiple operating systems seamlessly. In contrast, Text Edit Plus does not emphasize this feature, which may limit its usability for developers working across different platforms.
Users report that PureBasic's autocompletion feature is highly rated at 9.4, making coding more efficient and reducing errors. On the other hand, Text Edit Plus lacks this feature, which can slow down the coding process for users who rely on quick suggestions while typing.
G2 users highlight that Text Edit Plus shines in its find and replace functionality, scoring 9.4, which is particularly useful for users who need to make bulk changes in their code. PureBasic, while still functional, scores lower at 8.3 in this area, indicating it may not be as robust for this specific task.
Users on G2 mention that collaborative editing in PureBasic is rated at 9.0, making it a strong choice for teams working together on projects. In contrast, Text Edit Plus scores only 7.1, suggesting it may not be as effective for collaborative efforts.
Reviewers say that both products have similar quality of support, each scoring 8.3, indicating that users can expect a comparable level of assistance when encountering issues. However, PureBasic's product direction score of 6.7 suggests some users may have concerns about its future development compared to Text Edit Plus, which scored a perfect 10.0.
Users report that while both products offer syntax highlighting at a score of 8.0, PureBasic's overall functionality and extensibility score of 8.3 indicates it may provide a more customizable experience for developers looking to enhance their coding environment compared to Text Edit Plus.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.