Users report that Proxmox VE excels in scalability with a score of 9.4, allowing businesses to easily expand their virtual environments as needed, while SQL Server on Virtual Machines, although robust, does not match this level of scalability.
Reviewers mention that Proxmox VE offers superior OS integration with a score of 9.6, making it easier to manage various operating systems within virtual machines, whereas SQL Server on Virtual Machines has a lower integration score, which can complicate multi-OS environments.
G2 users highlight Proxmox VE's resource-saving capabilities, scoring 9.2, which helps in optimizing hardware usage, while SQL Server on Virtual Machines, although efficient, does not provide the same level of resource management, leading to potential over-provisioning.
Users on G2 report that SQL Server on Virtual Machines shines in quality of support with a score of 8.6, which is higher than Proxmox VE's score of 7.0, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise with SQL Server.
Reviewers mention that Proxmox VE's performance management features score 9.4, allowing for detailed monitoring and optimization of virtual machine performance, while SQL Server on Virtual Machines, despite being powerful, lacks some of the granular performance management tools that Proxmox offers.
Users say that Proxmox VE's data recovery features score 8.6, providing a solid safety net for virtual environments, while SQL Server on Virtual Machines, while capable, does not offer the same level of user satisfaction in this area, leading to concerns about data integrity during recovery processes.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.