Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Progress Telerik and python wiki 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
AwareIM
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $849.00 Per Year
No pricing available
Progress Telerik
Star Rating
(194)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $849.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing planspython wiki
Star Rating
(14)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about python wikiSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Progress Telerik excels in its Component Library, receiving a score of 9.2, while Python Wiki's library scored slightly higher at 9.6, indicating a broader range of components available for developers.
- Reviewers mention that Progress Telerik's ease of use is rated at 8.2, which is lower than Python Wiki's 9.2, suggesting that users find Python Wiki more intuitive for new developers.
- G2 users highlight that Progress Telerik's support quality is rated at 8.7, which is commendable, but Python Wiki edges ahead with a score of 9.1, indicating a more responsive support system.
- Users on G2 note that Progress Telerik has a strong score of 8.6 for Unlocked Components, but Python Wiki's score of 8.1 suggests it may have limitations in this area, potentially affecting customization options.
- Reviewers say that Progress Telerik's framework integration is rated at 8.7, while Python Wiki shines with a score of 9.2, indicating better compatibility with various frameworks, which is crucial for developers looking for flexibility.
- Users report that while both products have similar star ratings of 4.5, the total number of reviews for Progress Telerik (89) significantly outweighs Python Wiki's (13), suggesting a more established user base and potentially more reliable feedback.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Progress Telerik
Individual .NET Libraries
Starting at $849.00
Per Year
Telerik UI for Blazor, Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC, Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core, Telerik UI for .NET MAUI, Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC, Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core, Telerik UI for WPF, Telerik UI for WinForms.
- Truly native UI components to cover any app scenario
- Telerik UI Kits for Figma
- Document processing libraries
python wiki
No pricing availableFree Trial
Progress Telerik
Free Trial is available
python wiki
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
148
9.3
10
Ease of Use
8.5
154
9.2
10
Ease of Setup
8.7
122
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.9
53
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.0
146
9.1
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
55
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
149
8.8
10
Features by Category
Functionality
8.8
74
8.1
8
9.2
77
9.6
8
8.5
73
8.1
8
Management
8.6
76
9.2
8
8.1
72
9.3
7
8.9
77
8.5
8
Data Sources
8.8
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
Generation
8.1
12
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
Delivery
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
Generative AI
6.4
11
Not enough data
6.5
11
Not enough data
6.4
11
Not enough data
6.4
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Document Generation
4.0
7
Not enough data
Functionality
8.5
87
Not enough data
8.5
82
Not enough data
8.1
85
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
9.0
88
Not enough data
8.4
88
Not enough data
8.4
86
Not enough data
Application Design
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
Data Control
8.4
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
Publishing
8.3
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.6
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Low-Code Development Platforms
6.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
6.3
5
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Progress Telerik and python wiki are categorized as Component Libraries
Unique Categories
Progress Telerik is categorized as Application Development Platforms, Low-Code Development Platforms, and Document Generation
python wiki has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Progress Telerik
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
python wiki
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
21.1%
Information Technology and Services
10.0%
Oil & Energy
3.9%
Financial Services
3.9%
Hospital & Health Care
3.3%
Other
57.8%
Internet
15.4%
Information Technology and Services
15.4%
Consulting
7.7%
Writing and Editing
7.7%
Non-Profit Organization Management
7.7%
Other
46.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Telerik UI?
2 Comments
RS
Telerik UI helps in building application faster with less code, UI components are readily available to use for example Telerik Grid which comes with paging,...Read more
What is Telerik UI for asp net?
1 Comment
JL
My experience with Telerik has been with Winforms, Windows UI and MVC. For asp.net, I imagine that, like the foregoing platforms, Telerik provides UI...Read more
What is Progress Telerik used for?
1 Comment
JL
Telerik is used for enhancing the appearance and functionality of applications through enhanced efficiency of software development using proprietary...Read more
python wiki has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
