Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Progress Kemp LoadMaster and Traefik

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Star Rating
(202)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Traefik
Traefik
Star Rating
(35)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Traefik excels in its API Management capabilities, particularly in Traffic Control, where it received a score of 9.2, while Kemp LoadMaster, although strong, scored slightly lower at 9.1. Reviewers mention that Traefik's dynamic routing features make it easier to manage traffic effectively.
  • Reviewers mention that Kemp LoadMaster shines in Ease of Use, scoring 9.2 compared to Traefik's 8.1. Users on G2 appreciate the intuitive interface of Kemp LoadMaster, which simplifies the user experience, especially for those new to load balancing.
  • G2 users highlight that Traefik's scalability is impressive, with a score of 9.4, making it a preferred choice for businesses anticipating growth. In contrast, Kemp LoadMaster scored 9.1, which, while still good, indicates that Traefik may better accommodate rapidly changing demands.
  • Users say that Kemp LoadMaster offers superior Quality of Support, with a score of 9.3, compared to Traefik's 8.2. Reviewers mention that the responsiveness and expertise of Kemp's support team significantly enhance the overall user experience.
  • Reviewers mention that Traefik's Data Security is a standout feature, scoring an impressive 9.8, which is crucial for businesses handling sensitive information. In comparison, Kemp LoadMaster scored 9.0, indicating solid security but not quite matching Traefik's high standards.
  • Users report that both products have strong API Construction capabilities, but Traefik's orchestration score of 8.7 is slightly lower than Kemp LoadMaster's 9.1. Reviewers mention that Kemp's orchestration features are more robust, making it easier to integrate with existing systems.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
No pricing available
Traefik
OSS Application Proxy
Free
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Free Trial
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Free Trial is available
Traefik
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
144
9.4
25
Ease of Use
9.1
144
8.2
25
Ease of Setup
8.9
136
8.5
22
Ease of Admin
9.2
128
8.8
17
Quality of Support
9.2
136
8.2
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
139
8.6
12
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
137
10.0
24
Features by Category
8.1
38
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
7.8
38
Not enough data
7.2
38
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.4
37
Not enough data
8.3
36
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
8.9
38
Not enough data
7.7
37
Not enough data
7.9
36
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
7.9
37
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.8
9
API Construction
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
9.8
8
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
API Management
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.2
8
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Traefik
Traefik
Progress Kemp LoadMaster and Traefik are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no unique categories
Traefik
Traefik is categorized as Service Discovery, Container Networking, and API Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
10.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
51.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
37.9%
Traefik
Traefik
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
56.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
25.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
18.8%
Reviewers' Industry
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
7.4%
Hospital & Health Care
6.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.7%
Government Administration
4.2%
Other
64.7%
Traefik
Traefik
Computer Software
34.4%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Program Development
6.3%
Primary/Secondary Education
6.3%
Telecommunications
3.1%
Other
34.4%
Alternatives
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster Alternatives
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
F5 NGINX
Nginx
Add F5 NGINX
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Add F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
NetScaler
NetScaler
Add NetScaler
Traefik
Traefik Alternatives
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
HashiCorp Consul
HashiCorp Consul
Add HashiCorp Consul
F5 NGINX
Nginx
Add F5 NGINX
Azure Application Gateway
Azure Application Gateway
Add Azure Application Gateway
Discussions
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster Discussions
Can Kemp integrate with automation scripts?
2 Comments
NS
Hi John, The LoadMaster can be scripted to do things via PowerShell or an API wrapper such as java or anything else that can execute API commands. From...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no more discussions with answers
Traefik
Traefik Discussions
How do i secure admin ports in traefik
3 Comments
SC
If I need to expose Portainer outside of an internal network, I typically deploy Traefik with Authelia as the middleware.Read more
Is Traefik written in Go?
1 Comment
Tiffany L.
TL
Yes, Traefik Proxy is written in Go. Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Traefik has no more discussions with answers