Compare Procore and iSqFt 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.7% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
Procore
Star Rating
(4,106)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansiSqFt
Star Rating
(19)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about iSqFtSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Procore excels in providing a comprehensive view of every stage of a project, with users appreciating the intuitive and quick-to-use tools that enhance day-to-day operations. In contrast, iSqFt users mention that while the platform is easy to navigate, it may feel outdated compared to more modern solutions.
- Users say that Procore's implementation process is smooth and efficient, with many highlighting the ease of onboarding. On the other hand, iSqFt has received feedback indicating some challenges in matching specific workflow needs, which can complicate the setup for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Procore's quality of support is notably high, with a score reflecting strong user satisfaction. In comparison, while iSqFt offers decent support, it doesn't quite reach the same level of responsiveness and effectiveness as Procore.
- According to verified reviews, Procore stands out with a significantly larger user base and a wealth of recent feedback, indicating a vibrant community and ongoing product development. iSqFt, however, has fewer reviews and less recent activity, which may suggest a smaller user community and less frequent updates.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Procore's features are particularly beneficial for field quality control, making it easier for users to manage tasks on-site. iSqFt users appreciate the platform's filtering capabilities for finding relevant projects, but they may not find the same level of functionality for field operations.
- Users report that Procore's overall satisfaction ratings are significantly higher, reflecting a more favorable user experience across various metrics. iSqFt, while functional, tends to lag behind in user satisfaction, particularly in areas like ease of use and meeting specific project requirements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Procore
Project Execution
Contact Us
Bridge the gap between the office and the field with the only platform built to help you predict risk, protect profits, and deliver with confidence at any scale.
- Bid Management
- Project Management
- Quality & Safety
iSqFt
No pricing availableFree Trial
Procore
Free Trial is available
iSqFt
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
2,848
7.5
18
Ease of Use
8.6
3,448
7.3
18
Ease of Setup
8.2
2,314
7.7
5
Ease of Admin
8.5
1,332
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.0
2,698
7.6
17
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
1,295
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
2,785
7.4
18
Features by Category
Document Management
8.3
411
Not enough data
8.1
393
Not enough data
8.0
389
Not enough data
8.4
422
9.0
5
Qualifications
8.2
403
Not enough data
8.1
370
Not enough data
8.3
406
Not enough data
Construction Management
8.2
371
Not enough data
8.3
391
Not enough data
8.6
410
Not enough data
Documentation
7.6
578
Not enough data
9.1
809
Not enough data
8.5
782
Not enough data
8.4
728
Not enough data
8.4
754
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.7
755
Not enough data
8.6
782
Not enough data
8.5
764
Not enough data
8.7
761
Not enough data
Field Management
9.0
884
Not enough data
8.9
870
Not enough data
8.4
837
Not enough data
8.8
870
Not enough data
7.9
711
Not enough data
Asset Management
8.2
715
Not enough data
7.7
646
Not enough data
8.5
772
Not enough data
8.6
836
Not enough data
Workplace Safety Management
8.7
113
Not enough data
8.5
110
Not enough data
9.4
113
Not enough data
8.7
110
Not enough data
Operational Safety Management
8.2
87
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
8.1
91
Not enough data
8.4
101
Not enough data
Logistical Safety Management
8.9
112
Not enough data
8.0
88
Not enough data
8.4
88
Not enough data
8.9
103
Not enough data
Operations Management
8.3
118
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.5
120
Not enough data
8.4
115
Not enough data
8.9
132
Not enough data
8.7
124
Not enough data
Task Management
7.8
1218
Not enough data
7.5
1067
Not enough data
8.1
1133
Not enough data
8.8
1388
Not enough data
8.9
1491
Not enough data
8.9
1503
Not enough data
Site Management
8.5
1301
Not enough data
8.7
1429
Not enough data
8.5
1458
Not enough data
8.6
1422
Not enough data
7.6
1076
Not enough data
9.0
1486
Not enough data
7.9
1101
Not enough data
Workflow Management
8.1
205
Not enough data
8.1
225
Not enough data
Job Costing
7.7
212
Not enough data
8.1
206
Not enough data
8.1
210
Not enough data
Logistics and Operations
8.7
338
Not enough data
7.7
259
Not enough data
8.0
316
Not enough data
8.2
326
Not enough data
8.7
340
Not enough data
9.1
354
Not enough data
9.0
341
Not enough data
7.6
232
Not enough data
8.0
250
Not enough data
8.1
251
Not enough data
Document Management
9.0
1079
Not enough data
8.6
981
Not enough data
9.1
1143
Not enough data
8.1
917
Not enough data
8.5
956
Not enough data
Site Management
8.6
1014
Not enough data
8.8
1101
Not enough data
Data Management
8.9
391
Not enough data
8.7
390
Not enough data
8.4
398
Not enough data
8.1
328
Not enough data
8.3
348
Not enough data
8.2
321
Not enough data
8.4
344
Not enough data
8.4
402
Not enough data
Site Management
8.5
365
Not enough data
8.4
341
Not enough data
8.1
317
Not enough data
Data Gathering
8.3
158
Not enough data
8.3
153
Not enough data
8.4
166
Not enough data
Bid Generation
8.5
169
Not enough data
7.9
143
Not enough data
8.3
153
Not enough data
8.1
148
Not enough data
Scheduling Workflows - Construction Scheduling
8.7
112
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
107
Not enough data
8.6
107
Not enough data
Reporting & Analytics - Construction Scheduling
8.4
107
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
107
Not enough data
Productivity - Construction Scheduling
8.3
104
Not enough data
8.4
107
Not enough data
8.7
108
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Procore and iSqFt are categorized as Takeoff, Prequalification, and Bid Management
Unique Categories
iSqFt has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Procore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
iSqFt
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Construction
81.6%
Architecture & Planning
2.3%
Civil Engineering
2.0%
Accounting
1.3%
Commercial Real Estate
1.1%
Other
11.8%
Construction
84.2%
Building Materials
10.5%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.3%
‐
‐
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can we compare sheets?
3 Comments
WC
Yes, you can compare versions of the same drawing, or two different drawings. The functionality works best on a mobile device (phone or tablet), but is also...Read more
What is Procore?
3 Comments
Official Response from Procore
Procore manages your projects, resources, and financials from project planning to closeout. Our platform connects every project contributor to solutions...Read more
What makes Procore a leading solution in construction project management software?
3 Comments
DM
Industry Standard. We have actually received RFPs that required Procore by name. In other industries there are more equal competitors for your primary...Read more
iSqFt has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
