Link copied to clipboard # Procol vs SAP Ariba Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/procol/sap-ariba/export.csv) ProcolSAP Ariba[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Procol** Free Trial No pricing available **SAP Ariba** No pricing available **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **Procol** 1 monthFaster Based on 8 responses **SAP Ariba** 6 months Based on 7 responses Return on Investment **Procol** 13 months3 months sooner Based on 7 responses **SAP Ariba** 16 months Based on 7 responses Perceived Cost **Procol** $$$$$ **SAP Ariba** $$$$$ Average Discount **Procol** 12%3% more **SAP Ariba** 9% **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Procol** [ Ease of Use (5) ](https://www.g2.com/products/procol/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1463813&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Customer Support (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/procol/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1463663&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Missing Features (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/procol/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1463878&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Inaccuracy (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/procol/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1999862&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) **SAP Ariba** [ Ease of Use (110) ](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1797148&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Efficiency (76) ](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1798186&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Complexity (55) ](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1801433&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Learning Curve (52) ](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1803066&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Integrations **Procol** Not enough data **SAP Ariba** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_ebfae2a9075850f9fa094c23484ef258/microsoft-entra-id.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Microsoft Entra ID ](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-entra-id/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_69054bc7d40597b06fc3905720ccc914/microsoft-outlook.png "Product Avatar Image") Outlook ](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-outlook/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_218a6468d313312e43446d6a8135f441/microsoft-teams.png "Product Avatar Image") Microsoft Teams ](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-teams/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_7caad66b1c86da9baaf50e4fe2e07639/sap-cloud-erp-sap-s-4hana-cloud.png "Product Avatar Image") SAP Cloud ERP (SAP S/4HANA Cloud) ](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-cloud-erp-sap-s-4hana-cloud/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/integrations) Screenshots **Procol** No screenshot available **SAP Ariba** ![SAP Ariba screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1377305/sap-ariba-buying-and-invoicing-device-anlytcs.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Procol** 9.2 9.240 **SAP Ariba** 8.3 8.3553 Ease of Use **Procol** 9.5 9.542 **SAP Ariba** 7.9 7.9591 Ease of Setup **Procol** 9.5 9.525 **SAP Ariba** 7.7 7.7323 Ease of Admin **Procol** 9.7 9.716 **SAP Ariba** 7.9 7.9175 Quality of Support **Procol** 9.6 9.640 **SAP Ariba** 7.8 7.8525 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Procol** 9.5 9.516 **SAP Ariba** 8.1 8.1180 Product Direction (% positive) **Procol** 9.7 9.743 **SAP Ariba** 8.3 8.3521 **Features** ratings from reviews Procurement Spend Analysis 9.6 5 8.3 108 Spend Management 9.4 7 8.1 112 Strategic Sourcing 9.1 25 7.8 44 Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) Not enough data 8.3 89 Catalog Management Not enough data 7.8 9 Invoice Management Not enough data 8.1 171 Purchasing Not enough data 8.2 203 Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) Not enough data 8.4 148 Procure to Pay Not enough data 8.7 261 Contract Management Not enough data 7.9 165 Third Party & Supplier Risk Management Not enough data 8.1 12 User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 25.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 42.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 32.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 25.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 42.3% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 32.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 13.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 29.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 57.0% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 13.6% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 29.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 57.0% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Procol](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/950418e9d5b5117a7d138a83e9d860b1/procol.svg "Procol")](https://www.g2.com/products/procol/reviews) Procol Retail 13.5% Manufacturing 11.5% Construction 9.6% Pharmaceuticals 7.7% Consumer Goods 5.8% Other 51.9% [![SAP Ariba](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d1325eced74c78f93322576ca6fe3007/sap-ariba.svg "SAP Ariba")](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews) SAP Ariba Information Technology and Services 10.8% Accounting 6.0% Oil & Energy 5.5% Pharmaceuticals 4.3% Computer Software 4.3% Other 69.2% Alternatives **Procol Alternatives** ![Coupa](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/50cb69ef8557af98812aefcdf08a77fb/coupa-software-coupa.svg "Coupa") [ Coupa ](/products/coupa-software-coupa/reviews) ![Ramp](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6a582a4fcd932a8ba3e2d4d73af44e65/ramp-financial-ramp.svg "Ramp") [ Ramp ](/products/ramp-financial-ramp/reviews) ![Spendesk](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/ef51fda01e5a82d3ae3d2d2adcc8aeed/spendesk.svg "Spendesk") [ Spendesk ](/products/spendesk/reviews) ![Procurify](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/5ad6fa4db615e2e69b1eafc394dd7de9/procurify.svg "Procurify") [ Procurify ](/products/procurify/reviews) **SAP Ariba Alternatives** ![Coupa](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/50cb69ef8557af98812aefcdf08a77fb/coupa-software-coupa.svg "Coupa") [ Coupa ](/products/coupa-software-coupa/reviews) ![Zycus Source-to-Pay](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1f85f6287cbfc3f987637b23dbbd6236/zycus-source-to-pay.svg "Zycus Source-to-Pay") [ Zycus Source-to-Pay ](/products/zycus-source-to-pay/reviews) ![Ivalua](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/17ea5f65d1ad64d3d887b47d7fbfa812/ivalua.svg "Ivalua") [ Ivalua ](/products/ivalua/reviews) ![Jaggaer](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/339a27fa9213e71ee715b180f646831d/jaggaer.svg "Jaggaer") [ Jaggaer ](/products/jaggaer/reviews) ## Procol vs SAP Ariba FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 15, 2026 ### What is the difference between SAP Ariba vs Procol? Procol stands out for higher reviewer satisfaction across all key dimensions, while SAP Ariba is more established in the enterprise segment. | [SAP Ariba](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews) | [Procol](https://www.g2.com/products/procol/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.1/5 (792 reviews) | 4.8/5 (53 reviews) | | Enterprise | Mid-Market | | 7.7 | 9.5 | | 7.8 | 9.6 | | Supplier Management (62 all-time mentions) | Ease of Use (5 all-time mentions) | ### How do the pricing models of SAP Ariba and Procol compare? Procol is rated as the stronger value, with higher satisfaction on price and cost-related dimensions. - **SAP Ariba:** Reviewers frequently cite high subscription and implementation costs, with several noting that the price is higher compared to competitors. - **Procol:** In recent reviews, buyers highlight Procol as cost-effective and offering strong ROI, with multiple reviewers describing it as "amazingly inexpensive" and "well priced." - **Switching reasons:** Reviewers mention switching to Procol for better value and lower total cost of ownership. ### What are the best alternatives to SAP Ariba and Procol? The top 3 alternatives to SAP Ariba and Procol are Coupa, Zycus Source-to-Pay, and Ivalua. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [SAP Ariba](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews) | 4.1/5 (792 reviews) | Enterprise | High subscription and implementation costs | Supplier Management (62 all-time mentions) | | [Procol](https://www.g2.com/products/procol/reviews) | 4.8/5 (53 reviews) | Mid-Market | Cost-effective, strong ROI | Ease of Use (5 all-time mentions) | | [Coupa](https://www.g2.com/products/coupa-software-coupa/reviews) | 4.2/5 (569 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Comprehensive spend management | | [Zycus Source-to-Pay](https://www.g2.com/products/zycus-source-to-pay/reviews) | 3.6/5 (13 reviews) | — | — | Source-to-pay automation | | [Ivalua](https://www.g2.com/products/ivalua/reviews) | 4.3/5 (102 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Configurability and flexibility | ### Which Procure to Pay features should I prioritize when comparing SAP Ariba and Procol? Buyers should prioritize Ease of Use, Integration, Supplier Management, Implementation Experience, and Cost Efficiency when comparing SAP Ariba and Procol. - **Ease of Use:** SAP Ariba (7.9), Procol (9.5); 110 all-time mentions for SAP Ariba, 5 for Procol. - **Integration:** SAP Ariba (integration issues: 34 all-time mentions), Procol (easy integrations: 1 recent mention). - **Supplier Management:** SAP Ariba (62 all-time mentions), Procol (recent reviews highlight transparency and vendor collaboration). - **Implementation Experience:** SAP Ariba (Ease of Setup: 7.7), Procol (Ease of Setup: 9.5). - **Cost Efficiency:** SAP Ariba (reviewers cite high costs), Procol (reviewers highlight cost-effectiveness and ROI). ### What are the pros and cons of SAP Ariba vs Procol? SAP Ariba's headline strength is supplier management, while Procol's is ease of use and cost efficiency. - **SAP Ariba strengths:** Supplier Management (62 all-time mentions), Efficiency (76), Centralized procurement, Strong integration with SAP ecosystem. - **SAP Ariba trade-offs:** Complexity (55 all-time mentions), Steep learning curve (38), High subscription and implementation costs, Integration issues (34), Not user-friendly (49). - **Procol strengths:** Ease of Use (5 all-time mentions), Cost-effective, Fast implementation, Strong customer support, User-friendly interface, Efficient procurement workflows. - **Procol trade-offs:** Missing features (2 all-time mentions), Occasional software bugs, Limited advanced features compared to larger enterprise platforms. ### Is SAP Ariba or Procol better for small businesses? Procol is the better fit for small businesses, with higher satisfaction among mid-market and small-business reviewers. - **SAP Ariba:** Largest segment is Enterprise; reviewers note complexity and higher costs, which may be less suitable for small businesses. - **Procol:** Largest segment is Mid-Market; reviewers consistently highlight ease of use, fast setup, and cost-effectiveness for smaller organizations. ### Which Procure to Pay platform has better integrations? Procol is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing easier and faster integration experiences. - **SAP Ariba:** Integrates with SAP ECC (3 all-time mentions); reviewers note integration issues and time-consuming setup. - **Procol:** Reviewers highlight easy integration with ERP systems and mention quick deployment and simple integration in recent feedback. ### How do SAP Ariba and Procol compare on customer support? Procol leads on Quality of Support by a material margin, with a 0.8-point advantage over SAP Ariba (9.6 vs 7.8). - **SAP Ariba:** Reviewers describe support as responsive but sometimes slow, with mixed experiences on issue resolution. - **Procol:** Reviewers consistently praise customer support as proactive, timely, and highly responsive, with multiple mentions of strong implementation and ongoing assistance. ### Which is easier to implement, SAP Ariba or Procol? Procol is easier to implement, with a 1.8-point higher Ease of Setup score (9.5 vs 7.7) and consistently positive reviewer sentiment. - **SAP Ariba:** Reviewers report moderate to high setup complexity, longer implementation times, and a need for significant training, especially for new users. - **Procol:** Reviewers highlight fast deployment, minimal training requirements, and straightforward onboarding, with multiple mentions of quick and easy setup. ### Which product has better Integration? Procol is rated higher for Integration, with reviewers citing easier and faster integration experiences. - **SAP Ariba:** Integration issues (34 all-time mentions), integrates with SAP ECC, and reviewers note time-consuming integration processes. - **Procol:** Easy integrations (recent reviews), higher Ease of Setup (9.5), and reviewers highlight quick ERP integration and simple onboarding.