# Perimeter vs Vendor Risk Comparison
---
## AI Generated Summary
- **G2 reviewers report** that UpGuard excels in providing a comprehensive view of third-party security posture, with users appreciating its ability to simplify vendor risk management through continuous monitoring and an intuitive dashboard. This feature allows stakeholders to identify risks early and make informed decisions.
- **Users say** that Perimeter stands out for its responsive support team, which is noted for being personable and effective in resolving issues. Reviewers highlight the improvements made with AI v2, which assists in answering questionnaires, making the process more efficient and user-friendly.
- **According to verified reviews** , UpGuard's user interface is praised for being admin-friendly, allowing users to view all external risks in a single dashboard. This ease of navigation is a significant advantage for organizations looking to streamline their risk management processes.
- **Reviewers mention** that while Perimeter is user-friendly and has facilitated smooth onboarding for teams, it has a smaller user base compared to UpGuard, which may affect the breadth of community support and shared experiences available to new users.
- **G2 reviewers highlight** that UpGuard's overall quality and satisfaction metrics are significantly higher, reflecting a more robust product experience. Users frequently commend its effective risk monitoring capabilities, which provide continuous assessments to all stakeholders.
- **Users report** that while Perimeter offers a centralized risk intelligence system that improves tracking of vendor posture, it may not match the depth of features and insights provided by UpGuard, particularly in terms of risk scoring and monitoring alerts.



| | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Star Rating** | 4.8 out of 5 | 4.5 out of 5 | 
| **Total Reviews** | 45 | 708 | 
| **Largest Market Segment** | Enterprise (51.2% of reviews) | Enterprise (48.7% of reviews) | 
| **Entry Level Price** | No pricing available | $1,750.00 Per Month | 

---
## Top Pros & Cons

### Perimeter

Pros:
- Ease of Use (5 reviews)
- Vendor Management (3 reviews)

Cons:
- Complex Setup (2 reviews)
- Integration Issues (1 reviews)

### Vendor Risk

Pros:
- Ease of Use (267 reviews)
- Security (151 reviews)

Cons:
- Lack of Clarity (56 reviews)
- Expensive (38 reviews)

---
## Ratings Comparison
| Rating | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
  | **Meets Requirements** | 9.6 (29 reviews) | 8.7 (584 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Use** | 9.3 (29 reviews) | 9.0 (597 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Setup** | 8.9 (20 reviews) | 9.0 (491 reviews) | 
  | **Ease of Admin** | 9.2 (19 reviews) | 9.1 (333 reviews) | 
  | **Quality of Support** | 9.8 (29 reviews) | 9.0 (521 reviews) | 
  | **Has the product been a good partner in doing business?** | 9.7 (19 reviews) | 9.1 (319 reviews) | 
  | **Product Direction (% positive)** | 10.0 (24 reviews) | 9.5 (567 reviews) | 

---
## Pricing

### Perimeter

#### Entry-Level Pricing

No pricing available

#### Free Trial

Yes

### Vendor Risk

#### Entry-Level Pricing

Plan: Standard

Price: $1,750.00 Per Month

Description: Move from manual to automated risk management

Key Features:
- Monitor 50 vendors
- Vendor Security Ratings
- Assessment & Remediation Workflows

[Browse all 4 editions](https://www.g2.com/products/vendor-risk/pricing)

#### Free Trial

Yes

---
## Features Comparison By Category

### Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Perimeter** | 8.3/10 | 15 |
| **Vendor Risk** | 8.2/10 | 293 |

#### Functionality

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Customized Vendor Pages** | 8.8 (8 reviews) | 8.3 (269 reviews) | 
| **Centralized Vendor Catalog** | 9.2 (13 reviews) | 8.6 (268 reviews) | 
| **Questionnaire Templates** | 8.6 (13 reviews) | 8.6 (275 reviews) | 
| **User Access Control** | 7.5 (12 reviews) | 8.7 (272 reviews) | 

#### Risk assessment

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Risk Scoring** | 9.1 (13 reviews) | 8.8 (278 reviews) | 
| **4th Party Assessments** | 7.3 (8 reviews) | 7.9 (254 reviews) | 
| **Monitoring And Alerts** | 7.9 (11 reviews) | 8.7 (273 reviews) | 
| **AI Monitoring** | Not enough data | 7.5 (84 reviews) | 

#### Generative AI - Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Text Summarization** | Not enough data | 7.6 (82 reviews) | 
| **Text Generation** | Not enough data | 7.7 (83 reviews) | 

### Third Party & Supplier Risk Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Perimeter** | N/A | N/A |
| **Vendor Risk** | 8.1/10 | 406 |

#### Risk Assessment

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Scoring** | 9.0 (5 reviews) | 8.6 (357 reviews) | 
| **AI** | Not enough data | 7.4 (161 reviews) | 

#### Risk Control

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Reviews** | Not enough data | 8.4 (342 reviews) | 
| **Policies** | Not enough data | 8.1 (332 reviews) | 
| **Workflows** | 7.7 (5 reviews) | 8.0 (341 reviews) | 

#### Monitoring

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Vendor Performance** | Not enough data | 8.5 (337 reviews) | 
| **Notifications** | 7.7 (5 reviews) | 8.5 (351 reviews) | 
| **Oversight** | Not enough data | 8.6 (342 reviews) | 

#### Reporting

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Templates** | 7.8 (6 reviews) | 8.4 (337 reviews) | 
| **Centralized Data** | Not enough data | 8.4 (328 reviews) | 
| **360 View** | Not enough data | 8.3 (336 reviews) | 

#### Agentic AI - Third Party & Supplier Risk Management

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Adaptive Learning** | Not enough data | 7.2 (103 reviews) | 
| **Decision Making** | Not enough data | 7.2 (103 reviews) | 

### IT Risk Management

| Product | Score | Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| **Perimeter** | N/A | N/A |
| **Vendor Risk** | 7.3/10 | 149 |

#### Generative AI

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **AI Text Generation** | Not enough data | 7.2 (145 reviews) | 

#### Monitoring - IT Risk Management

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **AI Monitoring** | Not enough data | 7.8 (75 reviews) | 

#### Agentic AI - IT Risk Management

| Feature | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Autonomous Task Execution** | Not enough data | 6.9 (53 reviews) | 
| **Multi-step Planning** | Not enough data | 7.3 (53 reviews) | 

---
## Categories
**Shared Categories (2):** [Vendor Security and Privacy Assessment Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/vendor-security-and-privacy-assessment), [Third Party & Supplier Risk Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/third-party-supplier-risk-management)


**Unique to Vendor Risk (1):** [IT Risk Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/it-risk-management)


---
## Reviewer Demographics

### By Company Size

| Segment | Perimeter | Vendor Risk | 
|---|---|---|
| **Small-Business** | 14.0% | 11.2% | 
| **Mid-Market** | 34.9% | 40.1% | 
| **Enterprise** | 51.2% | 48.7% | 

### By Industry

#### Perimeter

- **Hospital & Health Care:** 23.3%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 11.6%
- **Computer Software:** 7.0%
- **Retail:** 4.7%
- **Management Consulting:** 4.7%
- **Financial Services:** 4.7%
- **Information Services:** 4.7%
- **Apparel & Fashion:** 2.3%
- **Business Supplies and Equipment:** 2.3%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 2.3%
- **Other:** 32.6%

#### Vendor Risk

- **Financial Services:** 10.1%
- **Information Technology and Services:** 9.8%
- **Computer Software:** 9.1%
- **Computer & Network Security:** 5.6%
- **Manufacturing:** 4.0%
- **Hospital & Health Care:** 3.5%
- **Retail:** 3.2%
- **Utilities:** 3.2%
- **Banking:** 2.7%
- **Insurance:** 2.7%
- **Other:** 45.9%

---
## Alternatives

### Alternatives to Perimeter

- [Secureframe](https://www.g2.com/products/secureframe/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (796 reviews)
- [Loopio](https://www.g2.com/products/loopio/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (811 reviews)
- [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (1285 reviews)
- [Vanta](https://www.g2.com/products/vanta/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (2432 reviews)
- [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (1300 reviews)
- [Optro](https://www.g2.com/products/optro/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (1595 reviews)
- [Thoropass](https://www.g2.com/products/thoropass/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (579 reviews)
- [Sprinto](https://www.g2.com/products/sprinto-inc/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (1638 reviews)
- [Drata](https://www.g2.com/products/drata/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (1160 reviews)
- [SAP Ariba](https://www.g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews) — 4.1/5 stars (786 reviews)

### Alternatives to Vendor Risk

- [SecurityScorecard](https://www.g2.com/products/securityscorecard/reviews) — 4.3/5 stars (91 reviews)
- [Bitsight](https://www.g2.com/products/bitsight/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (76 reviews)
- [Vanta](https://www.g2.com/products/vanta/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (2432 reviews)
- [Optro](https://www.g2.com/products/optro/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (1595 reviews)
- [Secureframe](https://www.g2.com/products/secureframe/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (796 reviews)
- [Sprinto](https://www.g2.com/products/sprinto-inc/reviews) — 4.8/5 stars (1638 reviews)
- [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews) — 4.9/5 stars (1300 reviews)
- [Drata](https://www.g2.com/products/drata/reviews) — 4.7/5 stars (1160 reviews)
- [Loopio](https://www.g2.com/products/loopio/reviews) — 4.6/5 stars (811 reviews)
- [Responsive, formerly RFPIO](https://www.g2.com/products/responsive-formerly-rfpio/reviews) — 4.5/5 stars (1285 reviews)

---
## Top Discussions

### Perimeter

- Title: [What is ProcessBolt used for?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-processbolt-used-for) — 1 comment *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "ProcessBolt is used to assess and continuously monitor your third party vendors, easily, inexpensively, and comprehensively."

### Vendor Risk

- Title: [Domain at risk of being hijacked](https://www.g2.com/discussions/domain-at-risk-of-being-hijacked) — 1 comment, 1 upvote *(includes official response)*
  > **Top comment:** "Hi and thank you for your message! UpGuard recently switched domain registrars because of this issue. We will remove this risk for all domains at a..."

---
**Source:** [G2.com](https://www.g2.com) | [Comparison Page](https://www.g2.com/compare/processbolt-perimeter-vs-vendor-risk)