Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare PractiTest and mabl

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
PractiTest
PractiTest
Star Rating
(231)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $49.00 Per Month
Browse all 2 pricing plans
mabl
mabl
Star Rating
(37)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.4% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us Per Year
Learn more about mabl
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that PractiTest excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring 8.9, which allows for efficient organization and retrieval of test cases, while mabl's Test Repository is not specifically rated, indicating a potential gap in this area.
  • Reviewers mention that mabl shines in Ease of Use with a score of 9.0, making it more accessible for teams new to automation, whereas PractiTest has a slightly lower score of 8.3, suggesting a steeper learning curve for some users.
  • G2 users highlight PractiTest's strong Reporting capabilities, with a score of 8.6, particularly praising its Version Control feature, which helps maintain test integrity over time, while mabl's reporting features are less emphasized in user reviews.
  • Users on G2 note that mabl's Automated Creation & Testing feature scores an impressive 9.2, allowing for rapid test generation, which is a significant advantage for teams looking to streamline their testing processes compared to PractiTest's more manual approach.
  • Reviewers mention that PractiTest's Centralized Information feature scores highly at 9.4, facilitating better collaboration among team members, while mabl does not have a comparable feature highlighted, which may affect team communication.
  • Users say that both products have strong Quality of Support, with PractiTest scoring 9.1 and mabl slightly higher at 9.2, indicating that both companies are committed to assisting their users effectively, but mabl may have a slight edge in responsiveness.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
PractiTest
Team (Popular)
Starting at $49.00
Per Month
Browse all 2 pricing plans
mabl
Personalized Pricing
Contact Us
Per Year
Learn more about mabl
Free Trial
PractiTest
Free Trial is available
mabl
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
181
8.6
28
Ease of Use
8.3
182
9.0
28
Ease of Setup
8.3
87
8.8
11
Ease of Admin
8.5
81
9.0
5
Quality of Support
9.1
169
9.2
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
75
9.3
5
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
174
8.7
26
Features by Category
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.5
86
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
82
Not enough data
8.4
73
Not enough data
8.6
79
Not enough data
Management
8.5
80
Not enough data
8.4
73
Not enough data
8.4
75
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
18
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
9.2
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.5
17
Automation
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.8
17
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Software Testing ToolsHide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
PractiTest
PractiTest
mabl
mabl
PractiTest and mabl are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
PractiTest
PractiTest is categorized as Test Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
PractiTest
PractiTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
29.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
42.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.1%
mabl
mabl
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
36.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
44.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
19.4%
Reviewers' Industry
PractiTest
PractiTest
Information Technology and Services
25.4%
Computer Software
21.9%
Retail
5.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Marketing and Advertising
3.5%
Other
39.0%
mabl
mabl
Computer Software
30.6%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
5.6%
Insurance
5.6%
Higher Education
5.6%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
Other
47.2%
Alternatives
PractiTest
PractiTest Alternatives
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Qase
Qase
Add Qase
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Add Tricentis qTest
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
mabl
mabl Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Tricentis Testim
Tricentis Testim
Add Tricentis Testim
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
Katalon Platform
Katalon Platform
Add Katalon Platform
Discussions
PractiTest
PractiTest Discussions
How do I plan to create filters so that I can reuse them again and again?
1 Comment
Nathan S.
NS
Hi Aniruddha, Thanks for reaching out. The best way to do that in your case is to create a 'Build' custom field of the type list and link it to the Test...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
PractiTest has no more discussions with answers
mabl
mabl Discussions
What does mabl do?
1 Comment
Cindy S.
CS
Quick answer: Mabl allows you to automate repetitive manual tests. Long answer: Mabl allows you to take a task that you must test prior to each release and...Read more
Who uses mabl?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
Any company with a Software Quality Assurance department in need for functional test automation needs. It can cover Web, Cross-browser, and API...Read more
Does mabl use Selenium?
1 Comment
Greg G.
GG
mabl does not use Selenium under the hood, it's mostly a combination of proprietary coding techniques and some Playwright libraries. Read more