Link copied to clipboard # Practice Fusion vs eClinicalWorks Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/practice-fusion/eclinicalworks/export.csv) Practice FusioneClinicalWorks[+ Add Product](#) Pricing **Practice Fusion** No pricing available **eClinicalWorks** **$449.00** · EHR Only **$599.00** · EHR with Practice Management **Pricing Insights** from reviews Perceived Cost **Practice Fusion** $$$$$ **eClinicalWorks** $$$$$ Average Discount **Practice Fusion** Not enough reviews yet **eClinicalWorks** Not enough reviews yet Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Time to Implement **Practice Fusion** 6 months Based on 100 responses **eClinicalWorks** 6 months Based on 100 responses Return on Investment **Practice Fusion** 6 months Based on 100 responses **eClinicalWorks** 6 months Based on 100 responses ![Practice Fusion](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1487567183/practice-fusion.png "Practice Fusion") ![eClinicalWorks](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_ff1c555802e8f5583e002098100141e9/eclinicalworks.png "eClinicalWorks") G2 offers free advice on this comparison. Chat with an expert How would you like to receive Software Advice? ![](/assets/advisor_router/laptop_form-f1a7012279826105416befde8d882ffc7589b1f9db09c93a1379d601cafe8e0d.svg) FormAnswer questions at your own pace, no call required. ![](/assets/advisor_router/ai_agent-4d78629a3ba354fed449a65c60df3a6f2eda90fb98411b711df4b25d7be52a38.svg) AI AgentChat live and get a recommendation in minutes. ![](/assets/advisor_router/phone_call_picker-c48821ec36f4182d8ee3e54cfbd3937500eec54d7b7e0cfb80dc80a8a733842f.svg) Phone CallTalk it through live with a software advisor. **Pros & Cons** from reviews **Practice Fusion** [ Ease of Use (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/practice-fusion/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1222087&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Accessibility (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/practice-fusion/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2230542&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Complex Navigation (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/practice-fusion/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2230497&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Difficult Navigation (1) ](https://www.g2.com/products/practice-fusion/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2230514&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) **eClinicalWorks** [ Ease of Use (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2467726&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ User Interface (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2467751&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Slow Loading (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2277137&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[ Slow Performance (2) ](https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=2277116&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews) Integrations **Practice Fusion** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_9ec3efdccbac05db26f3e613e5d1ddd5/tebra-previously-kareo-patientpop.png "Product Avatar Image") Tebra (previously Kareo +... ](https://www.g2.com/products/tebra-previously-kareo-patientpop/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/practice-fusion/integrations) **eClinicalWorks** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_283cf1655e34652fd8a657f777fc10ad/artera.png "Product Avatar Image") Artera ](https://www.g2.com/products/artera/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_e6e1bf97f966c1ab8989c328c6f899bd/azara-drvs.png "Product Avatar Image") Azara DRVS ](https://www.g2.com/products/azara-drvs/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_1d691480aa3fba0192c2518d27b928f0/epic.jpeg "Product Avatar Image") Epic ](https://www.g2.com/products/epic/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_1762c72c612a9ad3dc7f73da1048aa33/navina.png "Product Avatar Image") Navina ](https://www.g2.com/products/navina/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/integrations) Screenshots **Practice Fusion** No screenshot available **eClinicalWorks** ![eClinicalWorks screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/38329/three-devices.png) **Ratings** from reviews Meets Requirements **Practice Fusion** **8.1** /10 Based on 54 responses **eClinicalWorks** **7.8** /10 Based on 127 responses Ease of Use **Practice Fusion** **8.5** /10 Based on 55 responses **eClinicalWorks** **7.5** /10 Based on 129 responses Ease of Setup **Practice Fusion** **8.0** /10 Based on 16 responses **eClinicalWorks** **7.2** /10 Based on 46 responses Ease of Admin **Practice Fusion** **9.0** /10 Based on 13 responses **eClinicalWorks** **7.4** /10 Based on 39 responses Quality of Support **Practice Fusion** **7.3** /10 Based on 45 responses **eClinicalWorks** **6.8** /10 Based on 122 responses Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Practice Fusion** **8.3** /10 Based on 11 responses **eClinicalWorks** **7.4** /10 Based on 35 responses Product Direction (% positive) **Practice Fusion** **7.0** /10 Based on 50 responses **eClinicalWorks** **6.5** /10 Based on 129 responses **Features** ratings from reviews EHR **9.2** /10 Based on 15 responses **8.1** /10 Based on 38 responses Population Health Management Not enough data **8.7** /10 Based on 17 responses E-Prescribing **8.3** /10 Based on 13 responses Not enough data Uncover more feature rated insights from real users to improve your shopping experience. See it for free Patient Engagement Not enough data **8.2** /10 Based on 26 responses Medical Practice Management Not enough data **8.4** /10 Based on 16 responses User Insights **Reviewers' Company Size** Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 79.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 19.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 1.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 79.0% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 19.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 1.6% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 51.9% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 30.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 17.7% Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 51.9% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 30.4% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 17.7% **Reviewers' Industry** [![Practice Fusion](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1487567183/practice-fusion.png "Practice Fusion")](https://www.g2.com/products/practice-fusion/reviews) Practice Fusion Medical Practice 35.5% Hospital & Health Care 30.6% Health, Wellness and Fitness 11.3% Mental Health Care 4.8% Pharmaceuticals 3.2% Other 14.5% [![eClinicalWorks](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_ff1c555802e8f5583e002098100141e9/eclinicalworks.png "eClinicalWorks")](https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/reviews) eClinicalWorks Hospital & Health Care 54.8% Medical Practice 23.6% Health, Wellness and Fitness 8.3% Information Technology and Services 1.9% Accounting 1.3% Other 10.2% Alternatives **Practice Fusion Alternatives** ![Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d7c200158de895a9f31c2831810135f7/tebra-previously-kareo-patientpop.svg "Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)") [ Tebra (previously Kareo +... ](/products/tebra-previously-kareo-patientpop/reviews) ![Epic](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_1d691480aa3fba0192c2518d27b928f0/epic.jpeg "Epic") [ Epic ](/products/epic/reviews) ![ModMed](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/dc69ae8cef0b850897f4e5b584bbcc3e/modmed.svg "ModMed") [ ModMed ](/products/modmed/reviews) ![EHRYourWay](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_9ea97490ddd1756db33624254b06187d/ehryourway.png "EHRYourWay") [ EHRYourWay ](/products/ehryourway/reviews) **eClinicalWorks Alternatives** ![Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/d7c200158de895a9f31c2831810135f7/tebra-previously-kareo-patientpop.svg "Tebra (previously Kareo + PatientPop)") [ Tebra (previously Kareo +... ](/products/tebra-previously-kareo-patientpop/reviews) ![Epic](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_1d691480aa3fba0192c2518d27b928f0/epic.jpeg "Epic") [ Epic ](/products/epic/reviews) ![Oracle Health](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_f60ffee4888b1f35e19d83df284386e3/oracle-health.png "Oracle Health") [ Cerner ](/products/oracle-health/reviews) ![NextGen Healthcare EHR](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_83e32754048cef46ee56b61e606f6c13/nextgen-healthcare-ehr.png "NextGen Healthcare EHR") [ NextGen Healthcare EHR ](/products/nextgen-healthcare-ehr/reviews) ## Practice Fusion vs eClinicalWorks FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 15, 2026 ### What is the difference between eClinicalWorks vs Practice Fusion? Practice Fusion stands out for higher reviewer satisfaction on ease of use, setup, and support, while eClinicalWorks is noted for its comprehensive feature set and customization. | [eClinicalWorks](https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/reviews) | [Practice Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/practice-fusion/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 3.7/5 (158 reviews) | 3.8/5 (62 reviews) | | Small-Business | Small-Business | | 7.2 | 8.1 | | 6.8 | 7.3 | | Comprehensive Features | Ease of Use | ### How do the pricing models of eClinicalWorks and Practice Fusion compare? Practice Fusion is rated as the stronger value, with higher satisfaction on price and cost-related dimensions. - **eClinicalWorks:** Reviewers note that eClinicalWorks is considered expensive, with additional costs as more features are added, but some mention the value in its comprehensive functionality. - **Practice Fusion:** Reviewers highlight Practice Fusion as affordable and low cost, with several citing its value for small practices and satisfaction with its pricing model. - **Switching reasons:** Recent reviewers mention switching from eClinicalWorks due to cost concerns and seeking more affordable or easier-to-use alternatives. ### What are the best alternatives to eClinicalWorks and Practice Fusion? The top 3 alternatives to eClinicalWorks and Practice Fusion are Tebra, Epic, and Cerner. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [eClinicalWorks](https://www.g2.com/products/eclinicalworks/reviews) | 3.7/5 (158) | Small-Business | Expensive, additional costs for features | Comprehensive Features | | [Practice Fusion](https://www.g2.com/products/practice-fusion/reviews) | 3.8/5 (62) | Small-Business | Affordable, low cost | Ease of Use | | [Tebra](https://www.g2.com/products/tebra-previously-kareo-patientpop/reviews) | 4.1/5 (260) | Small-Business | — | Integration with practice management | | [Epic](https://www.g2.com/products/epic/reviews) | 4.2/5 (938) | Enterprise | — | Comprehensive EHR capabilities | | [Cerner](https://www.g2.com/products/cerner/reviews) | 3.5/5 (239) | Enterprise | — | Enterprise-grade functionality | ### Which EHR features should I prioritize when comparing eClinicalWorks and Practice Fusion? Buyers should prioritize ease of use, ease of setup, quality of support, patient portal functionality, and reporting/customization when comparing eClinicalWorks and Practice Fusion. - **Ease of Use:** eClinicalWorks 7.6, Practice Fusion 8.5 - **Ease of Setup:** eClinicalWorks 7.2, Practice Fusion 8.1 - **Quality of Support:** eClinicalWorks 6.8, Practice Fusion 7.3 - **Patient Portal:** Frequently mentioned as a key feature in both products' reviews - **Reporting/Customization:** eClinicalWorks is noted for customizable templates and detailed reporting, while Practice Fusion is praised for template creation and customization in recent reviews ### What are the pros and cons of eClinicalWorks vs Practice Fusion? Practice Fusion's headline strength is ease of use, while eClinicalWorks is recognized for its comprehensive features and customization. - **eClinicalWorks strengths:** Comprehensive features (1 all-time mention), customizable templates, integrated workflow for scheduling, billing, and documentation, supports high-volume practices, and centralizes patient information. - **eClinicalWorks trade-offs:** Reviewers cite slow performance (2 all-time mentions), system instability (2), technical issues (2), outdated interface, unintuitive workflows, and higher cost. - **Practice Fusion strengths:** Ease of use (1 all-time mention), intuitive interface, affordable pricing, customizable templates, and efficient charting and scheduling. - **Practice Fusion trade-offs:** Reviewers mention complex navigation (1 all-time mention), system downtime (1), intrusive notifications (1), and limited integration with some portals. ### Is eClinicalWorks or Practice Fusion better for small businesses? Practice Fusion is the better fit for small businesses, with higher satisfaction scores and strong small-business reviewer sentiment. - **eClinicalWorks:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers note its comprehensive features but mention higher cost and complexity for smaller practices. - **Practice Fusion:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers consistently highlight ease of use, affordability, and suitability for small practices. ### Which EHR platform has better integrations? Reviewers favor Practice Fusion for integrations, citing recent improvements and ease of connecting with other platforms. - **eClinicalWorks:** Recent reviews mention integration with Birdeye and LabCorp, but note that integration with other systems can be limited and time-consuming. - **Practice Fusion:** Recent reviews highlight integration with Tebra and Updox, with positive sentiment about importing medical records and connecting with practice management and telehealth platforms. ### How do eClinicalWorks and Practice Fusion compare on customer support? Practice Fusion leads on Quality of Support, with a 0.5-point advantage over eClinicalWorks (7.3 vs 6.8). - **eClinicalWorks:** Reviewers describe support as helpful but sometimes slow, with long wait times and challenges after initial onboarding. - **Practice Fusion:** Reviewers report generally positive support experiences, with several noting responsive and improving support, though some mention occasional delays or lack of a dedicated representative. ### Which is easier to implement, eClinicalWorks or Practice Fusion? Practice Fusion is easier to implement, with a 0.9-point lead on Ease of Setup (8.1 vs 7.2). - **eClinicalWorks:** Reviewers note that setup can be straightforward with support, but mention that implementation with third-party vendors can be lengthy and that training may require additional investment. - **Practice Fusion:** Reviewers consistently highlight fast and easy setup, a short learning curve, and smooth onboarding for both small and multi-site practices. ### Which product has better Patient Portal? Practice Fusion is favored for Patient Portal functionality, with reviewers citing its user-friendly and customizable portal as a standout feature. - **eClinicalWorks:** Patient Portal is mentioned in reviews as a useful feature, with positive sentiment but less emphasis on customization and user experience. - **Practice Fusion:** The patient portal is frequently highlighted as the best feature, with reviewers praising its usability and customization options, and a 4.5-star review specifically citing its superiority over other EHRs. ## Practice Fusion vs eClinicalWorks When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Practice Fusion easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Practice Fusion overall. - Reviewers felt that Practice Fusion meets the needs of their business better than eClinicalWorks. - When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Practice Fusion is the preferred option. - For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Practice Fusion over eClinicalWorks.