Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Postman and Zephyr Enterprise 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Postman
Star Rating
(1,648)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansZephyr Enterprise
Star Rating
(80)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Zephyr EnterpriseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Zephyr Enterprise excels in its Test Repository feature, scoring 8.8, which allows for efficient management of test cases and results, while Postman focuses more on API Testing, achieving a high score of 9.5, making it a preferred choice for developers looking to streamline their API workflows.
- Reviewers mention that Postman shines in API Monitoring with a score of 9.5, providing robust tools for tracking API performance, whereas Zephyr Enterprise's integration capabilities, rated at 8.3, may not be as comprehensive, leading to potential challenges in connecting with other tools.
- G2 users highlight that Postman's ease of use is a significant advantage, with a score of 9.1, making it accessible for teams of all skill levels, while Zephyr Enterprise, with a score of 7.8, may require more training and onboarding for new users.
- Users on G2 report that Zephyr Enterprise's Test Coverage feature scores an impressive 9.4, which is crucial for ensuring comprehensive testing across applications, while Postman, although strong in API Testing, does not emphasize test coverage to the same extent.
- Reviewers say that Postman’s collaboration features, rated at 8.6, facilitate teamwork effectively, allowing multiple users to work on API projects simultaneously, whereas Zephyr Enterprise's collaboration tools may not be as intuitive, impacting team dynamics.
- Users say that Zephyr Enterprise's Quality of Support, rated at 8.3, is satisfactory, but Postman’s support, with a score of 8.7, is often noted as being more responsive and helpful, enhancing the overall user experience when issues arise.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Postman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
Zephyr Enterprise
No pricing availableFree Trial
Postman
Free Trial is available
Zephyr Enterprise
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,294
8.3
69
Ease of Use
9.1
1,309
7.8
71
Ease of Setup
9.3
555
8.4
39
Ease of Admin
8.9
180
8.6
38
Quality of Support
8.7
1,075
8.2
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
152
8.3
33
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
1,254
7.1
69
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.5
12
Management
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
API Management
8.8
147
Not enough data
9.1
149
Not enough data
8.7
145
Not enough data
8.7
141
Not enough data
Security Testing
8.7
140
Not enough data
9.4
143
Not enough data
9.5
146
Not enough data
Security Management
8.8
137
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.0
135
Not enough data
Development
9.5
559
Not enough data
8.8
514
Not enough data
8.7
494
Not enough data
8.8
508
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.8
521
Not enough data
8.8
498
Not enough data
8.9
511
Not enough data
Functionality
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
9.6
30
Not enough data
Usability
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.0
31
Not enough data
9.5
33
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
Integration - AI Agent Builders
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
Development - API Platforms
9.4
301
Not enough data
8.9
291
Not enough data
8.7
280
Not enough data
8.8
284
Not enough data
Collaboration - API Platforms
8.8
285
Not enough data
8.7
282
Not enough data
8.6
276
Not enough data
API Management - API Platforms
9.0
285
Not enough data
8.4
281
Not enough data
8.5
275
Not enough data
8.9
279
Not enough data
8.3
272
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
8.1
175
Not enough data
8.0
175
Not enough data
8.2
176
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
9.5
824
Not enough data
8.7
726
Not enough data
8.6
668
Not enough data
8.8
375
Not enough data
API Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
760
Not enough data
8.9
738
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
648
Not enough data
Data Integration
8.8
680
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Postman and Zephyr Enterprise are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
Zephyr Enterprise is categorized as Automation Testing and Test Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Zephyr Enterprise
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
35.1%
Information Technology and Services
30.7%
Financial Services
3.2%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.2%
Computer Software
22.1%
Information Technology and Services
19.5%
Telecommunications
6.5%
Marketing and Advertising
3.9%
Internet
3.9%
Other
44.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Postman used for?
6 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
Zephyr Enterprise has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
