Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Postman and Qase 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
$0.00
Postman
Star Rating
(1,659)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (37.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansQase
Star Rating
(269)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Postman excels in its user-friendly interface, with a score of 9.1 for Ease of Use, making it a favorite among developers for API testing. In contrast, Qase, while slightly higher at 9.3, is noted for its intuitive test case management features, which some users find particularly beneficial for small teams.
- Reviewers mention that Postman has a robust set of features for API development, including automated testing and collaboration tools, which contribute to its high score of 9.3 for Meets Requirements. However, Qase shines in test case management and reporting, scoring 8.9, which some users feel is more tailored for small businesses.
- G2 users highlight that Postman offers a free entry-level price, making it accessible for startups and individual developers. Qase, while also free, is noted for its comprehensive features that cater specifically to small businesses, which may justify its pricing strategy in the long run.
- Users on G2 report that Postman has a total of 1208 reviews, indicating a strong user base and community support. In comparison, Qase, with 248 reviews, is still growing but has garnered a loyal following among small business users who appreciate its focused feature set.
- Reviewers mention that Postman’s Quality of Support is rated at 8.6, with users appreciating the extensive documentation and community forums. Qase, however, stands out with a score of 9.6, with users praising its responsive customer service and personalized support, which is crucial for smaller teams.
- Users say that Postman has a solid Product Direction score of 9.1, indicating a commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates. Qase, with a higher score of 9.5, is recognized for its proactive approach to user feedback, leading to frequent enhancements that align closely with the needs of small businesses.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Postman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
Qase
Free
$0.00
For students, small projects, and non-profits.
- Up to 3 users
- 500Mb for attachments
- Test case management
Free Trial
Postman
Free Trial is available
Qase
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,305
8.9
242
Ease of Use
9.1
1,321
9.3
246
Ease of Setup
9.3
567
9.3
176
Ease of Admin
8.9
182
9.3
110
Quality of Support
8.7
1,085
9.6
224
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
154
9.2
96
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
1,265
9.5
243
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.4
178
Not enough data
8.3
164
Not enough data
9.1
172
Management
Not enough data
8.7
173
Not enough data
8.3
163
Not enough data
8.7
163
API Management
8.8
147
Not enough data
9.1
149
Not enough data
8.7
145
Not enough data
8.7
141
Not enough data
Security Testing
8.7
140
Not enough data
9.4
143
Not enough data
9.5
147
Not enough data
Security Management
8.8
137
Not enough data
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.0
135
Not enough data
Development
9.5
563
Not enough data
8.8
515
Not enough data
8.7
496
Not enough data
8.8
508
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.8
521
Not enough data
8.8
500
Not enough data
8.9
511
Not enough data
Functionality
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.1
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
9.6
30
Not enough data
Usability
9.1
29
Not enough data
9.0
31
Not enough data
9.5
33
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
82
Not enough data
8.9
83
Not enough data
8.5
82
Not enough data
8.9
82
Automation
Not enough data
8.9
80
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Customization - AI Agent Builders
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
8.0
16
Not enough data
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
Integration - AI Agent Builders
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
Development - API Platforms
9.4
311
Not enough data
8.9
293
Not enough data
8.7
280
Not enough data
8.8
284
Not enough data
Collaboration - API Platforms
8.8
287
Not enough data
8.8
285
Not enough data
8.6
277
Not enough data
API Management - API Platforms
9.0
287
Not enough data
8.4
281
Not enough data
8.5
275
Not enough data
8.9
281
Not enough data
8.3
272
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
8.1
175
7.3
11
8.0
175
7.4
11
8.2
176
7.3
11
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
9.5
829
Not enough data
8.7
728
Not enough data
8.6
668
Not enough data
8.8
376
Not enough data
API Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
761
Not enough data
8.9
738
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
648
Not enough data
Data Integration
8.8
680
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Postman and Qase are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
Qase is categorized as Test Management and Automation Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
34.9%
Information Technology and Services
30.9%
Financial Services
3.2%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.2%
Computer Software
33.7%
Information Technology and Services
15.9%
Financial Services
6.1%
Program Development
3.8%
Hospital & Health Care
3.0%
Other
37.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Postman used for?
7 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
Qase has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
