Link copied to clipboard

# PostgreSQL vs SingleStore Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/postgresql/singlestore/export.csv)

PostgreSQLSingleStore[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**PostgreSQL** [

4.4/5(683)

](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews#reviews)

**SingleStore** [

4.5/5(118)

](https://www.g2.com/products/singlestore/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**PostgreSQL**
No pricing available

**SingleStore**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**PostgreSQL**
2 monthsFaster

Based on 73 responses

**SingleStore**
4 months

Based on 6 responses

Return on Investment

**PostgreSQL**
8 months13 months sooner

Based on 47 responses

**SingleStore**
21 months

Based on 5 responses

Perceived Cost

**PostgreSQL**
$$$$$

**SingleStore**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**PostgreSQL**
11%

**SingleStore**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**PostgreSQL**
[
Features (16)
](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1373123&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Ease of Use (13)
](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1373593&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Beginner Unfriendliness (7)
](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1374094&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)[
Complexity (6)
](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews?filters%5Bsentiment_snippet%5D=1373765&qs=pros-and-cons#reviews)

**SingleStore**
Not enough data

Integrations

**PostgreSQL**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_4c82924bf37fb0c0c2cf8d7f5cc68986/angular-dev-angular.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Angular

](https://www.g2.com/products/angular-dev-angular/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_d99c715051d74e27de9fd48624b6561e/apache-tomcat.png "Product Avatar Image")

Tomcat

](https://www.g2.com/products/apache-tomcat/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_bde6cd3bdabd1f16c41327bd71f4dee5/cpanel.png "Product Avatar Image")

cPanel

](https://www.g2.com/products/cpanel/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_a6c205d533dba77b318af96d91beb2ac/databricks.jpeg "Product Avatar Image")

Databricks

](https://www.g2.com/products/databricks/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/integrations)

**SingleStore**
Not enough data

Screenshots

**PostgreSQL**
 ![PostgreSQL screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/20331/uploads_2Fab7b5997-a58a-4539-8306-c978c4e82158_2FPostgreSQL-9-0-3_3.png)

**SingleStore**
No screenshot available

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**PostgreSQL**

9.1

9.1558

**SingleStore**

8.9

8.999

Ease of Use

**PostgreSQL**

8.5

8.5564

**SingleStore**

8.7

8.798

Ease of Setup

**PostgreSQL**

8.4

8.4293

**SingleStore**

8.4

8.459

Ease of Admin

**PostgreSQL**

8.2

8.2251

**SingleStore**

8.1

8.158

Quality of Support

**PostgreSQL**

7.9

7.9451

**SingleStore**

8.7

8.790

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**PostgreSQL**

8.5

8.5199

**SingleStore**

8.8

8.852

Product Direction (% positive)

**PostgreSQL**

8.5

8.5543

**SingleStore**

8.6

8.689

Features

Relational Databases[Hide 24 FeaturesShow 24 Features](javascript:void(0);)

8.9

521

9.0

81

Management 

Data Schema

9.1

129

9.3(won by 0.2)

28

Query Language

9.2

125

9.4(won by 0.2)

29

ACID - Complaint

9.2(won by 0.2)

115

9.0

23

Data Replication

8.9(won by 0.1)

115

8.8

23

Support 

Text Search

8.7(won by 0.1)

117

8.6

23

Data Types

9.1

134

9.3(won by 0.2)

25

Languages

9.1(won by 0.4)

114

8.7

22

Operating Systems

9.1(won by 0.3)

119

8.8

18

Security

Database Locking

8.7(won by 0.2)

120

8.5

19

Access Control

9.0(won by 0.1)

122

8.9

19

Encryption

8.7(won by 0.1)

113

8.6

19

Authentication

8.9(tied score)

115

8.9(tied score)

20

Performance 

Disaster Recovery

8.6

110

8.8(won by 0.2)

20

Data Concurrency

8.8

120

9.0(won by 0.2)

22

Workload Management

8.7

112

8.8(won by 0.1)

23

Advanced Indexing

8.7

121

9.0(won by 0.3)

23

Query Optimizer

8.6

117

9.1(won by 0.5)

24

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Database Features

Storage

9.0(tied score)

467

9.0(tied score)

70

Availability

9.0

473

9.2(won by 0.2)

69

Stability

9.0(won by 0.1)

481

8.9

69

Scalability

8.6

464

9.1(won by 0.5)

68

 (There is a greater than 0.5 difference between this product's rating and its competitors)

Security

8.7

447

8.9(won by 0.2)

61

Data Manipulation

8.8(tied score)

463

8.8(tied score)

66

Query Language

9.0

471

9.1(won by 0.1)

70

Show 2 feature categories with incomplete data

Vector Database[Hide 4 FeaturesShow 4 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data Indexing

Semantic Search

Not enough data

Not enough data

Indexing Data

Not enough data

Not enough data

Filters

Accurate Search

Not enough data

Not enough data

Single Stage Filtering - Vector Database

Not enough data

Not enough data

Real-time Analytic Database[Hide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Query latency

Lower query latency

Not enough data

Not enough data

Continuous queries

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data latency

Lower data latency

Not enough data

Not enough data

Data pipeline performance

Not enough data

Not enough data

Connectors

Faster ingestion

Not enough data

Not enough data

Built-in connectors

Not enough data

Not enough data

Scale

Linearly scalable database

Not enough data

Not enough data

Storage management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Architecture

Data security

Not enough data

Not enough data

Lockless architecture

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![PostgreSQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_251be2af3ae607c45c14e816eaa1cf41/postgresql.png "PostgreSQL")](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews)

PostgreSQL

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

36.0%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

34.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

29.7%

[![SingleStore](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/21cd4e6d2e8b28ee9e4528b72372d57b/singlestore.svg "SingleStore")](https://www.g2.com/products/singlestore/reviews)

SingleStore

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

37.7%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

24.6%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

37.7%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

36.0%

37.7%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

34.3%

24.6%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

29.7%

37.7%

Reviewers' Industry

[![PostgreSQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_251be2af3ae607c45c14e816eaa1cf41/postgresql.png "PostgreSQL")](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews)
PostgreSQL

Information Technology and Services

27.4%

Computer Software

22.9%

Financial Services

4.2%

Internet

4.2%

Telecommunications

2.8%

Other

38.6%

[![SingleStore](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/21cd4e6d2e8b28ee9e4528b72372d57b/singlestore.svg "SingleStore")](https://www.g2.com/products/singlestore/reviews)
SingleStore

Information Technology and Services

21.9%

Computer Software

18.4%

Financial Services

12.3%

Internet

7.0%

Banking

6.1%

Other

34.2%

FAQs

## PostgreSQL vs SingleStore FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 15, 2026

### What is the difference between PostgreSQL vs SingleStore?

SingleStore stands out for its higher G2 rating and support satisfaction, while PostgreSQL is recognized for its open-source reliability and feature set.

| [PostgreSQL](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews) | [SingleStore](https://www.g2.com/products/singlestore/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.4/5 (684 reviews) | 4.5/5 (118 reviews) |
| — | — |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| 7.9 | 8.7 |
| Open source, reliability, and advanced features | High speed analytics and unified transactional/analytical workloads |

### How do the pricing models of PostgreSQL and SingleStore compare?

PostgreSQL is favored by reviewers for its value due to being open source and license-free, while SingleStore receives positive feedback for performance but is noted as pricier for large-scale or always-on workloads.

- **PostgreSQL:** Reviewers consistently highlight the absence of licensing costs and strong ROI, with open-source status lowering total cost and reducing operational expenses.
- **SingleStore:** Reviewers praise SingleStore's performance and speed but mention that its managed solution can be costly for large or always-on deployments, though a free self-hosted version is available.
- **Switching reasons:** Several reviewers cite moving to PostgreSQL to avoid licensing fees and to consolidate workloads, while SingleStore is chosen for scenarios where speed and real-time analytics justify higher costs.

### What are the best alternatives to PostgreSQL and SingleStore?

The top three alternatives to PostgreSQL and SingleStore are CockroachDB, MS SQL, and MySQL.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [PostgreSQL](https://www.g2.com/products/postgresql/reviews) | 4.4/5 (684 reviews) | — | Open source, no licensing fees | Reliability, advanced features, extensibility |
| [SingleStore](https://www.g2.com/products/singlestore/reviews) | 4.5/5 (118 reviews) | — | Performance-focused, higher cost for managed | Speed, unified transactional and analytical workloads |
| [CockroachDB](https://www.g2.com/products/cockroachdb/reviews) | 4.3/5 (29 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Distributed SQL, scalability |
| [MS SQL](https://www.g2.com/products/microsoft-sql-server/reviews) | 4.4/5 (2287 reviews) | Enterprise | — | Enterprise-grade reliability, integration with Microsoft ecosystem |
| [MySQL](https://www.g2.com/products/mysql/reviews) | 4.4/5 (1682 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Ease of use, widespread adoption |

### Which Relational Databases features should I prioritize when comparing PostgreSQL and SingleStore?

Buyers should prioritize ACID compliance, scalability, integration capabilities, performance, and cost structure when comparing PostgreSQL and SingleStore.

- **ACID compliance:** PostgreSQL is cited in 16 all-time mentions for features and 10 for reliability, with reviewers consistently highlighting robust ACID guarantees; SingleStore is praised for combining transactional and analytical workloads with ACID support.
- **Scalability:** PostgreSQL receives 10 all-time mentions for scalability, with reviewers noting strong vertical scaling and some complexity in horizontal scaling; SingleStore is frequently praised for high throughput and easy horizontal scaling in recent reviews.
- **Integration capabilities:** PostgreSQL is mentioned in 6 all-time reviews for easy integrations, with specific integrations like Python (27 all-time mentions), Tableau (4), and Ruby on Rails (3); SingleStore is noted for managed service integrations with AWS, Azure, and GCP.
- **Performance:** PostgreSQL has 6 all-time mentions for performance and 5 for query speed; SingleStore is repeatedly cited for high ingest and query speed, especially for large datasets and real-time analytics.
- **Cost structure:** PostgreSQL is open source with no licensing fees, cited in 10 all-time mentions for open source; SingleStore is noted for higher managed service costs but offers a free self-hosted version.

### What are the pros and cons of PostgreSQL vs SingleStore?

PostgreSQL's headline strength is its open-source reliability and extensibility, while SingleStore's is its high-speed analytics and unified transactional/analytical capabilities.

- **PostgreSQL strengths:** Features (16 all-time mentions), ease of use (13), open source (10), reliability (10), scalability (10), flexibility (8), data analytics (6), easy integrations (6), performance (6), query speed (5), customer support (4), data security (4), setup ease (4).
- **PostgreSQL trade-offs:** Beginner unfriendliness (7), complexity (6), learning curve (5), slow performance for large or write-heavy workloads (5), complex configuration (4), difficult learning (4), high hardware requirements (4).
- **SingleStore strengths:** Reviewers highlight high ingest and query speed, unified support for transactional and analytical workloads, easy horizontal scaling, and strong managed service integrations with major cloud providers.
- **SingleStore trade-offs:** Reviewers note higher managed service costs for always-on workloads, proprietary (not open source), and some onboarding/documentation challenges for new users.

### Is PostgreSQL or SingleStore better for small businesses?

PostgreSQL is the better fit for small businesses due to its open-source model and strong small-business reviewer sentiment.

- **PostgreSQL:** Small-business reviewers consistently cite the absence of licensing fees, ease of integration, and flexibility as key benefits for smaller teams and projects.
- **SingleStore:** While SingleStore is praised for performance and scalability, reviewers note that its managed service pricing may be less accessible for small businesses compared to PostgreSQL's open-source approach.

### Which Relational Databases platform has better integrations?

PostgreSQL is favored by reviewers for integrations, with a broader range of third-party tool mentions and higher all-time integration counts.

- **PostgreSQL:** Python (27 all-time mentions), Tableau (4), Ruby on Rails (3); reviewers highlight easy integration with BI tools, ETL pipelines, and programming languages.
- **SingleStore:** Reviewers mention managed service integrations with AWS, Azure, and GCP, and note support for Kafka pipelines and cloud storage, but with fewer specific third-party tool mentions.

### How do PostgreSQL and SingleStore compare on customer support?

SingleStore leads PostgreSQL in Quality of Support by a material margin, with scores of 8.7 versus 7.9.

- **PostgreSQL:** Reviewers describe strong community support and abundant documentation, but note that official vendor support is limited unless using a managed provider.
- **SingleStore:** Reviewers consistently praise responsive and proactive customer support, with several citing fast resolution of setup and configuration issues and high satisfaction with managed service support.

### Which is easier to implement, PostgreSQL or SingleStore?

PostgreSQL and SingleStore are rated equally on Ease of Setup, both scoring 8.4, indicating parity in implementation experience.

- **PostgreSQL:** Reviewers describe straightforward initial setup, especially for local and cloud deployments, but note that advanced configuration and tuning can be complex for beginners.
- **SingleStore:** Reviewers highlight fast cluster setup, guided tutorials, and easy onboarding, with some mentioning minor issues during initial configuration that were quickly resolved by support.

### Which product has better ACID?

PostgreSQL is more frequently cited for robust ACID compliance, with extensive reviewer support for its transactional integrity and reliability.

- **PostgreSQL:** ACID compliance is a top-cited feature (16 all-time mentions for features, 10 for reliability), with reviewers consistently highlighting strict adherence to ACID principles and strong transactional guarantees.
- **SingleStore:** Reviewers note ACID support and the ability to handle both transactional and analytical workloads, but with fewer explicit mentions of ACID as a headline feature.

Alternatives

**PostgreSQL Alternatives**

 ![Microsoft SQL Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a8a99a96fda235658139f710592f8a53/microsoft-sql-server.svg "Microsoft SQL Server")

[
MS SQL
](/products/microsoft-sql-server/reviews)

 ![MySQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_240340edca859994ec71e4490aa20022/mysql.png "MySQL")

[
MySQL
](/products/mysql/reviews)

 ![Oracle Database](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_82f55e945509bff7b8009e8024cfe73c/oracle-database.jpg "Oracle Database")

[
Oracle Database
](/products/oracle-database/reviews)

 ![Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1533130188/amazon-relational-database-service-rds.svg "Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS)")

[
Amazon Relational Database...
](/products/amazon-relational-database-service-rds/reviews)

**SingleStore Alternatives**

 ![CockroachDB](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/6c39a766181fb0346601c1841fe50d3c/cockroachdb.svg "CockroachDB")

[
CockroachDB
](/products/cockroachdb/reviews)

 ![MySQL](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_240340edca859994ec71e4490aa20022/mysql.png "MySQL")

[
MySQL
](/products/mysql/reviews)

 ![Microsoft SQL Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/a8a99a96fda235658139f710592f8a53/microsoft-sql-server.svg "Microsoft SQL Server")

[
MS SQL
](/products/microsoft-sql-server/reviews)

 ![Oracle Database](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_82f55e945509bff7b8009e8024cfe73c/oracle-database.jpg "Oracle Database")

[
Oracle Database
](/products/oracle-database/reviews)