Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Portainer and Red Hat OpenShift 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sangfor HCI
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (82.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 3 Nodes Per Month
No pricing available
Portainer
Star Rating
(283)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (82.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 3 Nodes Per Month
Learn more about PortainerRed Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(303)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShiftSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Portainer excels in ease of use, scoring 9.5 compared to Red Hat OpenShift's 8.2. Reviewers mention that Portainer's intuitive interface and straightforward navigation make it accessible for users of all skill levels, while OpenShift's complexity can be a barrier for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that Portainer offers superior ease of setup, with a score of 9.6 versus OpenShift's 7.8. Users say that Portainer's quick installation process and minimal configuration requirements allow teams to get started rapidly, whereas OpenShift often requires more extensive setup and configuration time.
- Users on G2 highlight Portainer's strong performance in access control, scoring 9.4 compared to OpenShift's 8.5. Reviewers say that Portainer provides granular control over user permissions, making it easier to manage security, while OpenShift's access control features can be more complex to navigate.
- Reviewers mention that Portainer shines in quality of support, with a score of 9.1 against OpenShift's 8.4. Users report that Portainer's support team is responsive and helpful, while OpenShift users have noted longer response times and less personalized support experiences.
- G2 users report that Portainer has a more favorable product direction, scoring 9.7 compared to OpenShift's 9.0. Reviewers mention that Portainer's roadmap is clear and aligns well with user needs, while OpenShift's direction can sometimes feel less transparent.
- Users say that both products perform well in orchestration, but Portainer edges out with a score of 9.2 versus OpenShift's 9.0. Reviewers mention that Portainer's orchestration capabilities are user-friendly and effective, making it easier to manage containerized applications compared to OpenShift's more complex orchestration features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Portainer
Portainer Business - 3 Nodes Free
$0.00
3 Nodes Per Month
Portainer Business is our fully featured, fully supported business product. It is used by some of the largest organizations in the world to deliver a powerful Kubernetes and Docker container management experience for DevOps and IT teams. With more than 650,000 active users, Portainer is proven to be the simplest and most effective way of adopting and managing Kubernetes, and Docker/Swarm environments.
- https://www.portainer.io/take-3
Red Hat OpenShift
No pricing availableFree Trial
Portainer
Free Trial is available
Red Hat OpenShift
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
238
8.7
83
Ease of Use
9.5
241
8.2
226
Ease of Setup
9.5
192
7.8
193
Ease of Admin
9.6
175
8.6
57
Quality of Support
9.1
152
8.4
73
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.5
133
8.6
53
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
231
9.0
80
Features by Category
Systems Management
9.2
6
Not enough data
10.0
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
IoT Capabilities
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Industrial IoT
Not enough data
Not enough data
Edge
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Automation
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Simplification - Internal Developer Platform
8.6
20
Not enough data
9.3
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
Automation - Internal Developer Platform
8.5
20
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
9.2
16
Database
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.2
24
Management
9.3
186
8.5
32
9.2
175
8.4
31
Feature Not Available
8.2
30
Organization
9.0
171
8.5
32
9.2
195
8.9
33
9.1
176
9.1
31
Development
8.7
142
8.5
27
9.1
169
8.8
30
8.8
140
8.6
25
Feature Not Available
9.2
26
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Portainer and Red Hat OpenShift are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
Red Hat OpenShift is categorized as Container Monitoring, Container Orchestration, Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS), and Server Virtualization
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Portainer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.9%
Computer Software
19.8%
Computer & Network Security
6.5%
Program Development
3.2%
Computer Networking
3.2%
Other
46.4%
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Financial Services
13.8%
Banking
9.2%
Computer Software
8.5%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Other
45.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Portainer used for?
3 Comments
AH
Managing and deploying docker containers.Read more
What is the difference between Portainer and Portainer CE?
3 Comments
AH
Portainer CE is the community edition.Read more
Can Portainer manage Swarm?
3 Comments
MP
Yes, Portainer has built-in management capabilities for both Swarm and Kubernetes.Read more
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 Comment
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
