Users report that Pocket excels in offline access with a score of 8.4, allowing users to save articles and read them without an internet connection, while Toby lacks this feature entirely, which can be a significant drawback for users who need access on the go.
Reviewers mention that Toby shines in its tagging capabilities, scoring 9.5 compared to Pocket's 8.8, making it easier for users to organize and retrieve saved content efficiently, which is crucial for productivity.
G2 users highlight that Pocket's browser extension is rated at 9.0, providing a seamless experience for saving content directly from the web, while Toby's extension scores slightly higher at 9.5, indicating a more robust integration with browsers.
Users on G2 report that Toby offers superior collaborative workspace options with a score of 9.4, allowing teams to work together more effectively, whereas Pocket's score of 7.7 in this area suggests it may not be as suitable for team environments.
Reviewers mention that Pocket has a solid ease of use rating of 9.2, but Toby edges ahead with a score of 9.5, indicating that users find Toby's interface more intuitive and user-friendly overall.
Users say that while Pocket has a decent quality of support rated at 8.4, Toby's support is perceived as less effective with a score of 7.6, which could impact user satisfaction and problem resolution experiences.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Pocket
No pricing available
Toby
No pricing available
Free Trial
Pocket
No trial information available
Toby
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
32
9.7
13
Ease of Use
9.2
33
9.5
13
Ease of Setup
9.3
9
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
19
7.6
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.