Join the 1500 companies using G2 Track to manage SaaS spend, usage, contracts & compliance.
Compare Planview Enterprise One, Workfront, Jira, and Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)

Pricing

 
Collaboration License
Contact
for pricing
Projects
starts at $10
/ month for 10 users
 
Work License
Contact
/ user / month
Development
starts at $20
/ month for 10 users
 
Plan License
Contact
/ user / month
Service Desk
$20
/ month for 10 users
 
Enterprise plus
Contact
for pricing
 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
Planview Enterprise One
Free Trial Unavailable
Workfront
Collaboration License
Contactfor pricing
Work License
Contact/ user / month
Plan License
Contact/ user / month
Enterprise plus
Contactfor pricing
Free Trial Unavailable
Jira
Projects
starts at $10/ month for 10 users
Development
starts at $20/ month for 10 users
Service Desk
$20/ month for 10 users
Free Trial Unavailable
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
7.6
8.1
8.6
8.1
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
6.7
7.6
7.6
7.8
Ease of Setup
Ease of Setup
5.8
6.9
7.0
6.6
Ease of Admin
Ease of Admin
7.0
8.0
7.2
7.1
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
7.1
8.1
7.8
7.4
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business With
7.7
8.4
8.3
8.0
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
6.6
8.0
7.8
6.1
Meets Requirements
Planview Enterprise One
7.6
Workfront
8.1
Jira
8.6
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
8.1
Ease of Use
Planview Enterprise One
6.7
Workfront
7.6
Jira
7.6
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
7.8
Ease of Setup
Planview Enterprise One
5.8
Workfront
6.9
Jira
7.0
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
6.6
Ease of Admin
Planview Enterprise One
7.0
Workfront
8.0
Jira
7.2
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
7.1
Quality of Support
Planview Enterprise One
7.1
Workfront
8.1
Jira
7.8
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
7.4
Ease of Doing Business With
Planview Enterprise One
7.7
Workfront
8.4
Jira
8.3
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
8.0
Product Direction (% positive)
Planview Enterprise One
6.6
Workfront
8.0
Jira
7.8
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
6.1

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
3.7%
9.0%
22.3%
10.9%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
14.8%
33.4%
42.6%
15.2%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
81.5%
57.5%
35.2%
73.9%
Planview Enterprise One
Small-Business
3.7%
Mid-Market
14.8%
Enterprise
81.5%
Workfront
Small-Business
9.0%
Mid-Market
33.4%
Enterprise
57.5%
Jira
Small-Business
22.3%
Mid-Market
42.6%
Enterprise
35.2%
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
Small-Business
10.9%
Mid-Market
15.2%
Enterprise
73.9%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Information Technology and Services
20.7%
Marketing and Advertising
15.9%
Information Technology and Services
21.8%
Information Technology and Services
42.9%
 
Internet
17.2%
Financial Services
8.2%
Computer Software
20.7%
Computer Software
12.2%
 
Logistics and Supply Chain
10.3%
Computer Software
7.7%
Internet
8.4%
Financial Services
6.1%
 
Insurance
6.9%
Information Technology and Services
7.1%
Marketing and Advertising
5.3%
Research
4.1%
 
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Hospital & Health Care
4.3%
Financial Services
3.6%
Pharmaceuticals
4.1%
 
Other
37.9%
Other
56.9%
Other
40.2%
Other
30.6%
Planview Enterprise One
Information Technology and Services
20.7%
Internet
17.2%
Logistics and Supply Chain
10.3%
Insurance
6.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.9%
Other
37.9%
Workfront
Marketing and Advertising
15.9%
Financial Services
8.2%
Computer Software
7.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.1%
Hospital & Health Care
4.3%
Other
56.9%
Jira
Information Technology and Services
21.8%
Computer Software
20.7%
Internet
8.4%
Marketing and Advertising
5.3%
Financial Services
3.6%
Other
40.2%
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
Information Technology and Services
42.9%
Computer Software
12.2%
Financial Services
6.1%
Research
4.1%
Pharmaceuticals
4.1%
Other
30.6%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Pascal W.
User

PlanView gives you a chance to deal with any task and assets in an unequivocal way. One can without much of a stretch see which individual is taking a shot at which venture, what is the group structure, what are the objectives and their due dates. What I...

Jon J.
Administrator in Religious Institutions

I love the ability to re-prioritize my tasks in the order of how I'm going to work on them and then have that visible to everyone on my team. Also as a manager, this is the perfect way to essentially micromanage your teams' tasks without actually...

Daniel J.
User in Computer Software

We use JIRA extensively for issue management and tracking. Each team has a project and it is a great way to work amongst teams and collaborate. The tool is very versatile and great to have project leaders, watchers, stakeholders, etc. They also have...

Krunal R.
User in Consumer Electronics

It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
An N.
User

Planview is not user friendly and causes a lot of wasted time trying to navigate through it.

G2 User in Human Resources

Projects drop off my work page all the time. Finding them to add hours is a task in and of itself. I still have to keep track of my overall hours myself and then add at the end of the day. It's less for me and more for the company, which is fine. It would...

Jonathan D.
User in Information Technology and Services

I don't like that some development teams will try to use JIRA as an entire project management solution, because JIRA isn't a true project management solution.

G2 User in Logistics and Supply Chain

- It doesn't have Kanban agile board. HP Quality Center works more like a water fall model. - The user interface is not very user friendly. It requires many steps to file defect. The work flows is very bad. - If you write test plans or create defects...

 
Planview Enterprise One
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Pascal W.
User

PlanView gives you a chance to deal with any task and assets in an unequivocal way. One can without much of a stretch see which individual is taking a shot at which venture, what is the group structure, what are the objectives and their due dates. What I...

Most Helpful Critical Review
An N.
User

Planview is not user friendly and causes a lot of wasted time trying to navigate through it.

Workfront
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Jon J.
Administrator in Religious Institutions

I love the ability to re-prioritize my tasks in the order of how I'm going to work on them and then have that visible to everyone on my team. Also as a manager, this is the perfect way to essentially micromanage your teams' tasks without actually...

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User in Human Resources

Projects drop off my work page all the time. Finding them to add hours is a task in and of itself. I still have to keep track of my overall hours myself and then add at the end of the day. It's less for me and more for the company, which is fine. It would...

Jira
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Daniel J.
User in Computer Software

We use JIRA extensively for issue management and tracking. Each team has a project and it is a great way to work amongst teams and collaborate. The tool is very versatile and great to have project leaders, watchers, stakeholders, etc. They also have...

Most Helpful Critical Review
Jonathan D.
User in Information Technology and Services

I don't like that some development teams will try to use JIRA as an entire project management solution, because JIRA isn't a true project management solution.

Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Krunal R.
User in Consumer Electronics

It's the best tool for Quality Assurance - testing, defect tracking and management.

Most Helpful Critical Review
G2 User in Logistics and Supply Chain

- It doesn't have Kanban agile board. HP Quality Center works more like a water fall model. - The user interface is not very user friendly. It requires many steps to file defect. The work flows is very bad. - If you write test plans or create defects...

Screenshots

 
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
Planview Enterprise One
Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)
Ask Planview Enterprise One a QuestionContact Planview Enterprise OneRequest More InformationRequest More InformationAsk Jira a QuestionContact JiraAsk Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC) a QuestionContact Micro Focus Quality Center Enterprise (QC)