Users report that Wireshark excels in performance monitoring with a score of 9.5, allowing for detailed packet analysis, while PingPlotter, with a score of 9.0, provides solid performance monitoring but lacks the depth of packet-level insights that Wireshark offers.
Reviewers mention that Wireshark's alerting feature scores 7.4, which is higher than PingPlotter's 6.5, indicating that Wireshark provides more robust alerting capabilities, although both products could improve in this area.
G2 users highlight that Wireshark's path analysis feature scores 9.1, making it a strong choice for users needing detailed route tracing, whereas PingPlotter's score of 8.1 suggests it offers decent path analysis but may not be as comprehensive.
Users on G2 report that Wireshark's data visualization capabilities score 8.9, which is slightly better than PingPlotter's 8.8, indicating that both tools provide good visualization options, but Wireshark may have a slight edge in presenting complex data clearly.
Reviewers mention that Wireshark's multi-network capability scores 8.8, allowing users to analyze multiple networks effectively, while PingPlotter's score of 7.6 suggests it may not handle multi-network environments as efficiently.
Users say that Wireshark's improvement suggestions feature scores 8.2, indicating a proactive approach to network issues, while PingPlotter's lower score of 6.4 suggests it may not provide as many actionable insights for network optimization.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.