Users report that Pinegrow Web Editor excels in its WYSIWYG Editor Integration, allowing for real-time visual editing, which many find enhances their workflow significantly compared to Semantic UI's more code-centric approach.
Reviewers mention that Pinegrow's Templates Library is extensive, providing a wide variety of pre-designed templates that cater to small businesses, while Semantic UI's offerings are more limited and often require more customization.
G2 users highlight that Pinegrow's HTML and CSS Editors are user-friendly and intuitive, making it easier for beginners to get started, whereas users on G2 note that Semantic UI's editor can be more challenging for those without a strong coding background.
Users say that Pinegrow's Content Elements Libraries are robust and versatile, which allows for greater flexibility in design, while reviewers mention that Semantic UI's libraries, although comprehensive, can feel less adaptable for unique project needs.
Reviewers mention that Pinegrow's ease of setup is slightly lower than Semantic UI's, with some users finding the initial configuration process to be more complex, which could be a consideration for those looking for a quick start.
Users report that both platforms have similar quality of support, but Pinegrow users often feel that the community and resources available for troubleshooting are more extensive, providing a better overall support experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Pinegrow Web Editor
No pricing available
Semantic UI
No pricing available
Free Trial
Pinegrow Web Editor
No trial information available
Semantic UI
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
30
8.1
21
Ease of Use
8.3
30
8.9
21
Ease of Setup
8.5
8
8.8
8
Ease of Admin
8.1
7
9.5
7
Quality of Support
7.6
25
7.5
17
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.