Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Pinecone and Qdrant 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (84.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (58.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Pinecone
Star Rating
(38)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (84.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PineconeQdrant
Star Rating
(12)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (58.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about QdrantSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Qdrant excels in ease of setup with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a quick implementation, while Pinecone, with a score of 9.0, is slightly less favored in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Qdrant's semantic search capabilities are highly rated at 9.3, providing users with more relevant results, whereas Pinecone's score of 9.2 indicates it also performs well but may not match the precision of Qdrant.
- G2 users highlight that Qdrant's indexing data feature is rated at 9.5, showcasing its efficiency in handling large datasets, while Pinecone's 9.4 score suggests it is also effective but may not be as robust in high-volume scenarios.
- Users on G2 report that Pinecone shines in single-stage filtering with a score of 9.1, which allows for more streamlined queries, while Qdrant's score of 8.3 indicates it may require more steps for similar results.
- Reviewers mention that Qdrant has a solid quality of support rated at 8.5, but Pinecone edges ahead with a score of 8.8, indicating a slightly better user experience when seeking assistance.
- Users say that both products have strong product direction, with Qdrant receiving a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting a clear and promising roadmap, while Pinecone's score of 9.4 still reflects a positive outlook but not as strong as Qdrant's.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Pinecone
No pricing availableQdrant
No pricing availableFree Trial
Pinecone
Free Trial is available
Qdrant
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
37
8.5
11
Ease of Use
8.9
38
9.1
11
Ease of Setup
9.0
21
9.2
11
Ease of Admin
9.3
14
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
31
8.5
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.1
13
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
38
10.0
11
Features by Category
Data Indexing
9.2
36
9.3
10
9.4
36
9.5
10
Filters
8.7
36
8.7
10
9.0
34
8.3
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Pinecone and Qdrant are categorized as Vector Database
Unique Categories
Pinecone has no unique categories
Qdrant has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Pinecone
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Qdrant
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
36.8%
Information Technology and Services
13.2%
Retail
5.3%
Legal Services
5.3%
Higher Education
5.3%
Other
34.2%
Manufacturing
16.7%
E-Learning
16.7%
Computer & Network Security
16.7%
Marketing and Advertising
8.3%
Market Research
8.3%
Other
33.3%
Discussions
Pinecone has no discussions with answers
Qdrant has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
