Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Phabricator and Plastic SCM 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Octopus Deploy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Small-Business (64.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
$9.95 user/month
Phabricator
Star Rating
(27)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (48.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PhabricatorPlastic SCM
Star Rating
(36)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (64.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$9.95 user/month
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Plastic SCM excels in its Ease of Setup with a score of 8.0, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to get started quickly, while Phabricator's score of 6.3 indicates a more complex setup process that may require additional time and resources.
- Reviewers mention that Plastic SCM's Quality of Support is highly rated at 8.5, with many users appreciating the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas Phabricator's support, rated at 8.1, is seen as adequate but not as robust.
- G2 users highlight Plastic SCM's strong Integrations capabilities, allowing seamless connections with various tools, which enhances workflow efficiency. In contrast, users on G2 note that Phabricator's integrations are more limited, which can hinder collaboration with other software.
- Reviewers mention that Plastic SCM offers superior Bug Monitoring features, providing detailed analytics and history that help teams track issues effectively. Phabricator, while functional, does not provide the same level of detail, leading to potential oversights in bug tracking.
- Users say that Plastic SCM shines in Automation processes, allowing teams to streamline repetitive tasks easily, which is a significant advantage for productivity. Phabricator, however, lacks some of these automation features, making it less efficient for teams that rely heavily on automated workflows.
- Users report that Plastic SCM's Data Retention policies are more favorable, offering flexible options that cater to various team needs, while Phabricator's data retention features are seen as less accommodating, which could be a concern for teams managing large volumes of data.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Phabricator
No pricing availablePlastic SCM
Team
$9.95
user/month
- Response < 24h
- Unity3D plugin
- Team Engine (Up to 15 users)
Free Trial
Phabricator
No trial information availablePlastic SCM
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
27
7.6
26
Ease of Use
8.4
27
7.9
26
Ease of Setup
6.3
15
8.0
16
Ease of Admin
8.2
14
7.7
16
Quality of Support
8.1
15
8.5
23
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
8
8.5
16
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
27
8.1
25
Features by Category
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Phabricator and Plastic SCM are categorized as Version Control Hosting
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Phabricator
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Plastic SCM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
22.2%
Computer Software
22.2%
Internet
18.5%
Retail
11.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.4%
Other
18.5%
Computer Games
20.6%
Information Technology and Services
11.8%
Computer Software
8.8%
Automotive
8.8%
Gambling & Casinos
5.9%
Other
44.1%
Discussions
Phabricator has no discussions with answers
What's a task branch exactly?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
You've probably heard of concepts like bug branches, topic branches, and so on, right? Ok, even if you haven't, here's the answer: it's a branch you use to...Read more
But aren't branches supposed to be evil incarnate?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
Who told you that? I bet you found that on some Subversion guide, forum, or manual, maybe even on some other SCM website, didn't you? Branches are...Read more
What's Plastic SCM?
1 Comment
Official Response from Plastic SCM
Plastic is a version control system: it versions files and directories and keeps track of branching and merging as you've never seen before. And even better?...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
