Users report that PeoplePerHour.com has a lower star rating of 3.0 compared to Turing.com’s 4.2, indicating a general preference for Turing among users.
Reviewers mention that while PeoplePerHour.com excels in freelance screening with a score of 7.1, Turing.com slightly outperforms it with a score of 7.6, showcasing Turing's stronger vetting process for freelancers.
G2 users highlight that PeoplePerHour.com struggles with quality of support, scoring only 5.9, whereas Turing.com receives a much higher score of 7.9, suggesting that Turing provides more reliable customer service.
Users on G2 report that Turing.com shines in its workflow builder feature, scoring 8.1, which is significantly higher than PeoplePerHour.com’s score of 6.1, indicating a more robust project management capability.
Reviewers mention that PeoplePerHour.com offers a decent payment automation feature with a score of 6.1, but Turing.com surpasses this with a score of 7.5, reflecting a more efficient payment process.
Users say that Turing.com has a better product direction with a positive score of 8.9, compared to PeoplePerHour.com’s low score of 4.4, suggesting that Turing is more focused on future improvements and user needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
PeoplePerHour.com
No pricing available
Turing.com
No pricing available
Free Trial
PeoplePerHour.com
No trial information available
Turing.com
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.1
35
7.6
11
Ease of Use
7.5
34
8.2
11
Ease of Setup
7.6
13
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.6
7
Not enough data
Quality of Support
6.1
32
7.9
11
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.