Users report that django CMS has a solid Rich Text Editor with a rating of 9.2, but Payload CMS excels with a perfect score of 9.3, indicating a more user-friendly and feature-rich editing experience.
Reviewers mention that while django CMS offers decent Content Scheduling capabilities with a score of 8.1, Payload CMS shines with a score of 9.0, allowing for more efficient content management and planning.
G2 users highlight that django CMS's Asset Management features are rated at 6.9, which may limit users in organizing their media effectively, whereas Payload CMS scores 8.7, providing a more robust solution for managing digital assets.
Users on G2 report that django CMS has a lower score of 8.3 for Versioning, which can hinder content recovery and tracking changes, while Payload CMS achieves a perfect score of 10.0, ensuring users can easily manage content revisions.
Reviewers say that django CMS's Approval Process is rated at 8.0, which may not meet the needs of teams requiring strict content governance, while Payload CMS offers a perfect score of 10.0, making it ideal for collaborative environments.
Users report that django CMS has a User Community score of 8.1, which may limit support and resources, while Payload CMS boasts a score of 9.7, indicating a more active and helpful community for troubleshooting and sharing best practices.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.