Compare Parasoft Jtest and SonarQube 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Parasoft Jtest
Star Rating
(13)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Parasoft JtestSonarQube
Star Rating
(130)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SonarQube excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher score compared to Parasoft Jtest. Users appreciate its simple deployment process, especially when using Kubernetes, and the seamless integration with GitHub actions for efficient code scanning.
- Users say that Parasoft Jtest shines in its automation capabilities, which help establish coding test standards effectively. Reviewers highlight the tool's huge rule set and the ability to create custom rules, making it a strong choice for teams with specific testing needs.
- Reviewers mention that SonarQube provides valuable code suggestions that enhance code quality and help developers identify potential errors. This feature is particularly praised for its ability to guide users in writing more secure and efficient code.
- According to verified reviews, Parasoft Jtest is noted for its intuitive interface, which users find very easy to navigate. This usability helps save time on code analysis, making it a practical option for teams looking to streamline their testing processes.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while SonarQube has a robust support system, Parasoft Jtest outperforms it in terms of quality of support. Users appreciate the responsive assistance they receive, which enhances their overall experience with the product.
- Users report that SonarQube's recent updates and features contribute to its strong product direction, with a positive outlook from users. In contrast, Parasoft Jtest, while effective, has fewer recent reviews, which may indicate less frequent updates or user engagement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Parasoft Jtest
No pricing availableSonarQube
Cloud - based: Free
Free
For developers wanting to try SonarQube.
- Scan of private projects limited to 50k lines of code
- Users limited to max. 5
- Architecture management
Free Trial
Parasoft Jtest
No trial information availableSonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
8
8.8
110
Ease of Use
9.1
9
8.5
113
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.1
72
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.6
64
Quality of Support
9.1
9
8.2
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.4
58
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
5
8.6
107
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
7.8
19
Not enough data
6.0
20
Analysis
Not enough data
7.4
21
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Testing
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
5.9
19
Not enough data
6.0
21
Not enough data
6.9
18
Not enough data
6.8
17
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
6.8
22
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.8
36
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.8
34
Not enough data
7.1
33
Not enough data
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Parasoft Jtest and SonarQube are categorized as Static Code Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Parasoft Jtest is categorized as Peer Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Parasoft Jtest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
38.5%
Telecommunications
7.7%
Retail
7.7%
Insurance
7.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Other
30.8%
Information Technology and Services
27.0%
Computer Software
21.4%
Financial Services
7.1%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.1%
Discussions
Parasoft Jtest has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
