Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls and Snort 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ManageEngine DataSecurity Plus
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kitecyber
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
GoodAccess
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (72.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls
Star Rating
(156)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation FirewallsSnort
Star Rating
(18)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SnortSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls excels in Intrusion Prevention with a score of 8.9, while Snort, although effective, does not match this level of performance, indicating that Palo Alto offers a more robust solution for preventing unauthorized access.
- Reviewers mention that the ease of use for Snort is rated higher at 8.8 compared to Palo Alto's 8.4, suggesting that Snort may be more user-friendly for those who prioritize a simpler interface and quicker learning curve.
- G2 users highlight that Palo Alto's logging and reporting features score an impressive 8.5, providing detailed insights into network activity, whereas Snort's capabilities in this area are less comprehensive, which may limit visibility for users.
- Users on G2 report that Palo Alto's application gateway functionality is rated at 8.4, allowing for better application control, while Snort's capabilities in this area are not as strong, potentially impacting application security management.
- Reviewers say that Palo Alto's cloud data protection features score 8.4, making it a better choice for organizations that rely heavily on cloud services, whereas Snort does not offer the same level of cloud integration, which could be a drawback for cloud-centric businesses.
- Users report that Palo Alto's API and integrations score 8.6, indicating a strong ability to connect with other tools and systems, while Snort's integration capabilities are less robust, which may hinder its adaptability in diverse IT environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls
No pricing availableSnort
No pricing availableFree Trial
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls
No trial information availableSnort
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
140
6.5
18
Ease of Use
8.4
141
8.8
18
Ease of Setup
8.3
125
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.5
100
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
132
8.1
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
98
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
136
7.3
17
Features by Category
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
8.9
66
Not enough data
Prevention
9.0
63
Not enough data
9.3
62
Not enough data
8.9
62
Not enough data
9.0
62
Not enough data
8.3
59
Not enough data
Detection
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
62
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
Administration
8.9
61
Not enough data
8.8
62
Not enough data
8.6
58
Not enough data
Generative AI
8.2
19
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Administration
8.6
97
Not enough data
8.5
97
Not enough data
8.3
96
Not enough data
8.4
95
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Firewall Software
8.1
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
Functionality
8.7
97
Not enough data
8.4
94
Not enough data
8.8
95
Not enough data
8.8
95
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.4
95
Not enough data
8.5
94
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.6
95
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.1
29
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Firewall
7.6
15
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls and Snort are categorized as Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Unique Categories
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls is categorized as Firewall Software
Snort has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Snort
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Computer & Network Security
14.0%
Banking
7.3%
Computer Software
6.7%
Financial Services
5.3%
Other
46.7%
Computer Software
83.3%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Computer & Network Security
5.6%
‐
‐
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewall used for?
1 Comment
SK
It is an enterprise firewall solution which provides secure connection between two zones with features of firewall, IPS, Antivirus, DDOS protection, SSL...Read more
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls has no more discussions with answers
Snort has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
