Link copied to clipboard

# P4 vs Plastic SCM Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/p4/plastic-scm/export.csv)

P4Plastic SCM[+ Add Product](#)

Reviews

**P4** [

4.2/5(95)

](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews#reviews)

**Plastic SCM** [

4.2/5(36)

](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews#reviews)

Pricing

**P4**
Free Trial

**Free Trial** 5 Users With One-Time Purchase · P4 Free

**Plastic SCM**
Free Trial

**$9.95** user/month · Team

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Time to Implement

**P4**
1 monthFaster

Based on 8 responses

**Plastic SCM**
2 months

Based on 7 responses

Return on Investment

**P4**
14 months

Based on 5 responses

**Plastic SCM**
Not enough reviews yet

Perceived Cost

**P4**
$$$$$

**Plastic SCM**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**P4**
8%

**Plastic SCM**
Not enough reviews yet

Pros & Cons

**P4**
Not enough data

**Plastic SCM**
Not enough data

Screenshots

**P4**
 ![P4 screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/31924/perforce-g2-helix-swarm.jpg)

**Plastic SCM**
 ![Plastic SCM screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/33784/PlasticSCM_screenshot2.png)

Ratings

Meets Requirements

**P4**

8.4

8.486

**Plastic SCM**

7.6

7.626

Ease of Use

**P4**

7.7

7.787

**Plastic SCM**

7.9

7.926

Ease of Setup

**P4**

7.3

7.341

**Plastic SCM**

8.0

8.016

Ease of Admin

**P4**

7.7

7.742

**Plastic SCM**

7.7

7.716

Quality of Support

**P4**

8.8

8.873

**Plastic SCM**

8.5

8.523

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**P4**

8.6

8.641

**Plastic SCM**

8.5

8.516

Product Direction (% positive)

**P4**

7.7

7.782

**Plastic SCM**

8.1

8.125

Features

Repository Management[Hide 46 FeaturesShow 46 Features](javascript:void(0);)

9.0

5

Not enough data

Functionality

Integration

9.0(won by default)

5

Not enough data

Package Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Code Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Checks

Not enough data

Not enough data

Static Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

Project Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Repository Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Issue Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Workflow Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Assignment Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Change Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Testing/QA Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Application Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Management

Package Access Control

9.0(won by default)

5

Not enough data

Package Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Automation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Rollback

Not enough data

Not enough data

Version Control

Not enough data

Not enough data

Task Progress Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Issue Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Bug Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Additional Functionality

Code Review

Not enough data

Not enough data

Access Controls/Permissions

Not enough data

Not enough data

Audit Trail

Not enough data

Not enough data

Rules-Based Workflow

Not enough data

Not enough data

API

Not enough data

Not enough data

Visual Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Two-Factor Authentication

Not enough data

Not enough data

Bug/Issue Capture

Not enough data

Not enough data

Custom Development

Not enough data

Not enough data

Backup and Recovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multiple Programming Languages Supported

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Testing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Authentication

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Collaborative Development

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Performance Monitoring

Not enough data

Not enough data

Search/Filter

Not enough data

Not enough data

Content Library

Not enough data

Not enough data

Encryption

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Wiki

Not enough data

Not enough data

Reporting/Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Show 1 feature category with incomplete data

Version Control Software[Hide 44 FeaturesShow 44 Features](javascript:void(0);)

Not enough data

Not enough data

Activity Tracking

Activity Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

API

API

Not enough data

Not enough data

AI Copilot

AI Copilot

Not enough data

Not enough data

Third-Party Integrations

Third-Party Integrations

Not enough data

Not enough data

Workflow Management

Workflow Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Alerts/Notifications

Alerts/Notifications

Not enough data

Not enough data

Mobile Access

Mobile Access

Not enough data

Not enough data

Generative AI

Generative AI

Not enough data

Not enough data

Change Management

Change Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Reporting/Analytics

Reporting/Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Access Controls/Permissions

Access Controls/Permissions

Not enough data

Not enough data

Issue Management

Issue Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Version Control

Version Control

Not enough data

Not enough data

Audit Trail

Audit Trail

Not enough data

Not enough data

Authentication

Authentication

Not enough data

Not enough data

Search/Filter

Search/Filter

Not enough data

Not enough data

Project Management

Project Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Workflow Automation

Workflow Automation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Content Library

Content Library

Not enough data

Not enough data

Task Progress Tracking

Task Progress Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Custom Development

Custom Development

Not enough data

Not enough data

Two-Factor Authentication

Two-Factor Authentication

Not enough data

Not enough data

Issue Tracking

Issue Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Visual Analytics

Visual Analytics

Not enough data

Not enough data

Assignment Management

Assignment Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Continuous Integration

Continuous Integration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Rules-Based Workflow

Rules-Based Workflow

Not enough data

Not enough data

Repository Management

Repository Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Performance Monitoring

Performance Monitoring

Not enough data

Not enough data

Backup and Recovery

Backup and Recovery

Not enough data

Not enough data

Application Management

Application Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Bug Tracking

Bug Tracking

Not enough data

Not enough data

Testing/QA Management

Testing/QA Management

Not enough data

Not enough data

Encryption

Encryption

Not enough data

Not enough data

Wiki

Wiki

Not enough data

Not enough data

Bug/Issue Capture

Bug/Issue Capture

Not enough data

Not enough data

Vulnerability Scanning

Vulnerability Scanning

Not enough data

Not enough data

Static Analysis

Static Analysis

Not enough data

Not enough data

Security Testing

Security Testing

Not enough data

Not enough data

Configuration Automation

Configuration Automation

Not enough data

Not enough data

Code Repository Integration

Code Repository Integration

Not enough data

Not enough data

Collaborative Development

Collaborative Development

Not enough data

Not enough data

Multiple Programming Languages Supported

Multiple Programming Languages Supported

Not enough data

Not enough data

Code Review

Code Review

Not enough data

Not enough data

User Insights

Reviewers' Company Size

[![P4](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/35a0df1d713ddcc19e24e463ef622fa5/p4.svg "P4")](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews)

P4

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

24.7%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

36.6%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

38.7%

[![Plastic SCM](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1537960625/plastic-scm.svg "Plastic SCM")](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews)

Plastic SCM

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

64.7%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

14.7%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)

20.6%

Small-Business

(50 or fewer emp.)

24.7%

64.7%

Mid-Market

(51-1000 emp.)

36.6%

14.7%

Enterprise

(\> 1000 emp.)

38.7%

20.6%

Reviewers' Industry

[![P4](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/35a0df1d713ddcc19e24e463ef622fa5/p4.svg "P4")](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews)
P4

Computer Games

16.1%

Computer Software

16.1%

Information Technology and Services

12.9%

Entertainment

6.5%

Wireless

4.3%

Other

44.1%

[![Plastic SCM](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1537960625/plastic-scm.svg "Plastic SCM")](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews)
Plastic SCM

Computer Games

20.6%

Information Technology and Services

11.8%

Automotive

8.8%

Computer Software

8.8%

Animation

5.9%

Other

44.1%

FAQs

## P4 vs Plastic SCM FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between P4 vs Plastic SCM?

P4 and Plastic SCM are both rated 4.2/5 by G2 reviewers, but P4 is more prominent in the Mid-Market segment while Plastic SCM is favored by Small-Business users and scores higher on Ease of Setup.

| | [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) | [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| G2 Rating (reviews) | 4.2/5 (95 reviews) | 4.2/5 (36 reviews) |
| Largest Segment | Mid-Market | Small-Business |
| Ease of Setup score | 7.3 | 8.0 |
| Quality of Support score | 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | Handles large binary files and offers robust branching and merging features | Strong GUI, easy branching and merging, and excellent for game development projects |

### How do the pricing models of P4 and Plastic SCM compare?

Plastic SCM is rated higher for value with a Price/Cost satisfaction score of 8.5 versus P4's 8.4, indicating reviewers see it as the stronger value.

- **P4:** Reviewers note that the price is "semi fair" but mention maintenance costs can be high and the cost is per license.
- **Plastic SCM:** Recent reviews mention cost as a factor, but also highlight that it is relatively inexpensive compared to alternatives, especially for handling large binary projects.
- **Switching reasons:** Reviewers mention switching to Plastic SCM for better handling of large files and more affordable pricing for game development and binary-heavy projects.

### What are the best alternatives to P4 and Plastic SCM?

The top 3 alternatives to P4 and Plastic SCM are Azure DevOps Server, Bitbucket, and GitHub.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) | 4.2/5 (95 reviews) | Mid-Market | Price is semi fair, but maintenance costs can be high | Handles large binary files and robust branching/merging |
| [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) | 4.2/5 (36 reviews) | Small-Business | Relatively inexpensive for binary-heavy projects | Strong GUI, easy branching/merging, excellent for game development |
| [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) | 4.2/5 (200 reviews) | Mid-Market | — | Comprehensive DevOps toolchain integration |
| [Bitbucket](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews) | 4.4/5 (1018 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Easy integration with Atlassian tools |
| [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews) | 4.7/5 (2399 reviews) | Small-Business | — | Widely adopted, strong collaboration features |

### Which Version Control Software features should I prioritize when comparing P4 and Plastic SCM?

Buyers comparing P4 and Plastic SCM should prioritize Ease of Setup, Quality of Support, Ease of Use, Meets Requirements, and Ease of Admin.

- **Ease of Setup:** P4 scores 7.3, Plastic SCM 8.0.
- **Quality of Support:** P4 scores 8.8, Plastic SCM 8.5.
- **Ease of Use:** P4 scores 7.7, Plastic SCM 7.9.
- **Meets Requirements:** P4 scores 8.4, Plastic SCM 7.6.
- **Ease of Admin:** Both score 7.7.

### What are the pros and cons of P4 vs Plastic SCM?

P4's headline strength is handling large binary files and robust branching, while Plastic SCM's is its strong GUI and suitability for game development projects.

- **P4 strengths:** Handles large binary files, robust branching and merging, scalable for large teams, strong integration with Unreal Engine, and reliable file version control.
- **P4 trade-offs:** Maintenance costs can be high, GUI client is basic, initial learning curve for non-engineers, and some advanced features require complex setup.
- **Plastic SCM strengths:** Strong GUI, easy branching and merging, excellent for game development and binary-heavy projects, fast performance, and affordable for small teams.
- **Plastic SCM trade-offs:** UI can be confusing for new users, less frequent branching/merging compared to Git, and some reviewers note issues with large data and plugin performance in Unreal Engine.

### Is P4 or Plastic SCM better for small businesses?

Plastic SCM is better suited for small businesses, as indicated by its largest reviewer segment and positive small-business sentiment.

- **P4:** Largest segment is Mid-Market; reviewers highlight its scalability and robust features but note a steeper learning curve and higher maintenance costs for smaller teams.
- **Plastic SCM:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers praise its affordability, ease of use, and suitability for small teams, especially in game development and binary-heavy projects.

### Which Version Control Software platform has better integrations?

Reviewers rate P4 and Plastic SCM at parity for integrations, with both products supporting integrations with major development tools but no clear leader in recent reviews.

- **P4:** Reviewers mention integration with Unreal Engine, Visual Studio, and JIRA in recent reviews.
- **Plastic SCM:** Reviewers mention integration with Unity, Unreal Engine, and Jenkins in recent reviews.

### How do P4 and Plastic SCM compare on customer support?

P4 and Plastic SCM are rated at near-parity on Quality of Support, with P4 at 8.8 and Plastic SCM at 8.5, a difference below the materiality threshold.

- **P4:** Reviewers consistently praise the support team for being responsive, knowledgeable, and helpful during setup and troubleshooting.
- **Plastic SCM:** Reviewers describe support as helpful and responsive, with positive experiences resolving issues and onboarding new users.

### Which is easier to implement, P4 or Plastic SCM?

Plastic SCM is rated higher for Ease of Setup with a score of 8.0 versus P4's 7.3, a difference above the materiality threshold.

- **P4:** Reviewers note that initial setup is relatively easy for basic use but can become complex when configuring advanced features or integrating with other tools.
- **Plastic SCM:** Reviewers highlight quick installation, intuitive setup, and ease of onboarding new users, especially for small teams and game development projects.

Alternatives

**P4 Alternatives**

 ![Azure DevOps Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/611e56424aac6932c16d11e70b4b24a4/azure-devops-server.svg "Azure DevOps Server")

[
Azure DevOps Server
](/products/azure-devops-server/reviews)

 ![Bitbucket](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1505148943/bitbucket.svg "Bitbucket")

[
Bitbucket
](/products/bitbucket/reviews)

 ![Git](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_e4ae003c4d9b2b7615189af32032183d/git.png "Git")

[
Git
](/products/git/reviews)

 ![GitHub](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8ec3c17e3fb1df25b6a8bd7cc69cf2d1/github.png "GitHub")

[
GitHub
](/products/github/reviews)

**Plastic SCM Alternatives**

 ![GitHub](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8ec3c17e3fb1df25b6a8bd7cc69cf2d1/github.png "GitHub")

[
GitHub
](/products/github/reviews)

 ![Git](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_e4ae003c4d9b2b7615189af32032183d/git.png "Git")

[
Git
](/products/git/reviews)

 ![GitLab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2397ccd7309ef2bca71e3a275d59a5a3/gitlab.svg "GitLab")

[
GitLab
](/products/gitlab/reviews)

 ![Azure DevOps Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/611e56424aac6932c16d11e70b4b24a4/azure-devops-server.svg "Azure DevOps Server")

[
Azure DevOps Server
](/products/azure-devops-server/reviews)

## P4 vs Plastic SCM

When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Plastic SCM easier to use and set up. However, reviewers felt that administration of both products was equally easy, and preferred doing business with P4 overall.

- Reviewers felt that P4 meets the needs of their business better than Plastic SCM.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that P4 is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Plastic SCM over P4.