Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OX Security and SonarQube 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (62.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
OX Security
Star Rating
(51)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (62.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OX SecuritySonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OX Security excels in Quality of Support, scoring 9.6 compared to SonarQube's 8.0. Reviewers mention that OX Security's support team is responsive and knowledgeable, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Reviewers mention that OX Security has a higher Ease of Use score of 9.0 versus SonarQube's 8.3. Users say that OX Security's intuitive interface and streamlined workflows significantly reduce the learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight OX Security's superior Extensibility score of 9.1 compared to SonarQube's 6.3. Reviewers mention that OX Security offers a wide range of integrations and plugins, allowing for greater customization and adaptability to various development environments.
- Users on G2 report that OX Security outperforms SonarQube in Remediation Suggestions, scoring 9.1 against SonarQube's 8.2. Reviewers say that OX Security provides actionable insights that help developers address vulnerabilities more effectively.
- Reviewers mention that OX Security shines in the area of Product Direction, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, while SonarQube scores 8.0. Users report that OX Security consistently updates its features based on user feedback, ensuring the product evolves with industry needs.
- Users say that OX Security's Detection Rate of 9.1 surpasses SonarQube's 8.5, with reviewers highlighting that OX Security's scanning capabilities are more accurate and reliable, leading to fewer missed vulnerabilities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OX Security
No pricing availableSonarQube
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Free Trial
OX Security
Free Trial is available
SonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
47
8.8
108
Ease of Use
9.0
51
8.5
111
Ease of Setup
9.0
46
8.1
70
Ease of Admin
9.0
36
8.5
63
Quality of Support
9.6
46
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.7
35
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
47
8.6
105
Features by Category
Administration
8.5
25
7.8
19
9.0
27
6.0
20
Analysis
8.9
27
7.4
21
8.9
27
8.0
20
9.1
27
8.9
22
9.2
27
9.0
22
Testing
5.7
23
6.6
18
5.9
23
5.9
19
7.3
24
6.0
21
7.6
24
6.9
18
7.7
23
6.8
17
9.1
24
8.2
21
7.2
26
6.9
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
21
Not enough data
9.4
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.8
20
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
Documentation
8.7
26
7.7
35
9.3
27
7.6
35
9.1
27
8.2
36
Security
7.8
26
6.9
33
7.3
25
7.0
32
9.0
26
7.9
33
Security
9.1
11
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
Tracking
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.0
28
9.3
5
9.2
28
8.7
5
8.6
28
9.0
5
9.0
28
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.3
29
7.8
6
9.1
29
8.6
6
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.6
29
7.8
6
9.2
29
Not enough data
7.6
28
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
8.4
24
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
9.2
26
Not enough data
8.8
26
Not enough data
9.0
25
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OX Security and SonarQube are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), and Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Unique Categories
OX Security is categorized as Software Supply Chain Security Tools
SonarQube is categorized as Software Development Analytics Tools, Static Code Analysis, Bug Tracking, AI AppSec Assistants, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OX Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
25.5%
Information Technology and Services
15.7%
Gambling & Casinos
13.7%
Computer Software
7.8%
Computer Games
7.8%
Other
29.4%
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
OX Security has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
