Link copied to clipboard

# OutSystems vs Visual LANSA Comparison - What are their main differences?

Share
[
Export
](/compare/outsystems/visual-lansa-ide/export.csv)

OutSystemsVisual LANSA[+ Add Product](#)

Pricing

**OutSystems**
Free Trial

**$0.00** · OutSystems Personal Edition

**$36,300.00** Usage Based Per Year · OutSystems Developer Cloud

**Visual LANSA**
Free Trial

No pricing available

**Pricing Insights**
from reviews

Perceived Cost

**OutSystems**
$$$$$

**Visual LANSA**
$$$$$

Average Discount

**OutSystems**
12%

**Visual LANSA**
Not enough reviews yet

Uncover valuable pricing insights from real user feedback to improve your shopping experience.
See it for free

Time to Implement

**OutSystems** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Visual LANSA** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

Return on Investment

**OutSystems** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Visual LANSA** 6 months
Based on 100 responses

**Pros & Cons**
from reviews

**OutSystems**

Ease of Use (194)

Speed of Development (158)

Expensive (75)

Cost Issues (64)

**Visual LANSA**
Not enough data

Integrations

**OutSystems**
[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_ae4fb3e8ed69ec823d7d67868991afe0/alfa-systems.png "Product Avatar Image")

Alfa Systems

](https://www.g2.com/products/alfa-systems/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_dd674051aa4dc7d0dfc8b7737b799e0b/aws-bedrock.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

AWS Bedrock

](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-bedrock/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_b3390b4cc3d92e87d570895f7358c003/aws-lambda.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

AWS Lambda

](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-lambda/reviews)[

 ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_f176b4154a751d10150daa67a57b7dc5/azure-active-directory-domain-services.jpg "Product Avatar Image")

Azure Active Directory...

](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-active-directory-domain-services/reviews)[
View all
](https://www.g2.com/products/outsystems/integrations)

**Visual LANSA**
Not enough data

Screenshots

**OutSystems**
 ![OutSystems screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/1329692/Screen-Shot-2023-07-13-at-9.57.43-PM.png)

**Visual LANSA**
 ![Visual LANSA screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/153057/1-VL-Drag-Drop.PNG)

**Ratings**
from reviews

Meets Requirements

**OutSystems**

**8.9** /10

Based on 862 responses

**Visual LANSA**

**8.8** /10

Based on 71 responses

Ease of Use

**OutSystems**

**9.1** /10

Based on 1,406 responses

**Visual LANSA**

**8.8** /10

Based on 71 responses

Ease of Setup

**OutSystems**

**8.7** /10

Based on 1,083 responses

**Visual LANSA**

**7.3** /10

Based on 42 responses

Ease of Admin

**OutSystems**

**8.5** /10

Based on 515 responses

**Visual LANSA**

**8.1** /10

Based on 42 responses

Quality of Support

**OutSystems**

**8.5** /10

Based on 850 responses

**Visual LANSA**

**8.9** /10

Based on 71 responses

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?

**OutSystems**

**8.8** /10

Based on 493 responses

**Visual LANSA**

**9.0** /10

Based on 43 responses

Product Direction (% positive)

**OutSystems**

**9.2** /10

Based on 834 responses

**Visual LANSA**

**9.2** /10

Based on 72 responses

**Features**
ratings from reviews

Application Development Platforms

**8.6** /10

Based on 578 responses

**8.1** /10

Based on 6 responses

Low-Code Development Platforms

**8.5** /10

Based on 873 responses

**8.1** /10

Based on 31 responses

AI App Builder

**8.7** /10

Based on 32 responses

Not enough data

Uncover more feature rated insights from real users to improve your shopping experience.

See it for free

AI Agent Builders

**9.0** /10

Based on 111 responses

Not enough data

Mobile Development Platforms

**7.8** /10

Based on 17 responses

Not enough data

User Insights

**Reviewers' Company Size**

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.3%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.9%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
36.8%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.3%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.9%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
36.8%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
21.3%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
45.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
33.3%

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
21.3%

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
45.3%

Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.)
33.3%

**Reviewers' Industry**

[![OutSystems](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1503948396/outsystems.svg "OutSystems")](https://www.g2.com/products/outsystems/reviews)
OutSystems

Information Technology and Services
16.5%

Computer Software
12.3%

Insurance
7.1%

Banking
7.1%

Consulting
5.0%

Other
51.9%

[![Visual LANSA](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1535649446/visual-lansa-ide.SVG "Visual LANSA")](https://www.g2.com/products/visual-lansa-ide/reviews)
Visual LANSA

Information Technology and Services
14.7%

Computer Software
12.0%

Logistics and Supply Chain
8.0%

Warehousing
5.3%

Wholesale
4.0%

Other
56.0%

Alternatives

**OutSystems Alternatives**

 ![ServiceNow App Engine](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/c7ed381b8103a08f610090492732a5fe/servicenow-app-engine.svg "ServiceNow App Engine")

[
ServiceNow App Engine
](/products/servicenow-app-engine/reviews)

 ![Zoho Creator](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/0a84f55c85a46579b1dc756a6fee5a0b/zoho-creator.svg "Zoho Creator")

[
Zoho Creator
](/products/zoho-creator/reviews)

 ![UiPath Agentic Automation](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/52d1ee45d138a2ab66b69bb703ed76ce/uipath-agentic-automation.svg "UiPath Agentic Automation")

[
UiPath Agentic Automation
](/products/uipath-agentic-automation/reviews)

 ![Quickbase](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/b9699c0fa4dd8b1e4dca9cb53b76f2b0/quickbase.svg "Quickbase")

[
Quickbase
](/products/quickbase/reviews)

**Visual LANSA Alternatives**

 ![Zoho Creator](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/0a84f55c85a46579b1dc756a6fee5a0b/zoho-creator.svg "Zoho Creator")

[
Zoho Creator
](/products/zoho-creator/reviews)

 ![Mendix](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_1868b9f1e1e309faa746e621a6887491/mendix.png "Mendix")

[
Mendix
](/products/mendix/reviews)

 ![Visual Studio](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/646c72569089375221819d6efbe819a0/visual-studio.svg "Visual Studio")

[
Visual Studio
](/products/visual-studio/reviews)

 ![WaveMaker](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1545072124/wavemaker.png "WaveMaker")

[
WaveMaker
](/products/wavemaker/reviews)

## OutSystems vs Visual LANSA FAQs

Generated using AI

Last updated: August 14, 2026

### What is the difference between OutSystems vs Visual LANSA?

OutSystems and Visual LANSA both score 4.5/5 on G2, but OutSystems stands out for its higher Ease of Setup and a much larger review base, while Visual LANSA is noted for its user-centered approach and cross-platform capabilities.

| [OutSystems](https://www.g2.com/products/outsystems/reviews) | [Visual LANSA](https://www.g2.com/products/visual-lansa-ide/reviews) |
| --- | --- |
| 4.5/5 (1,802 reviews) | 4.5/5 (82 reviews) |
| Mid-Market | Mid-Market |
| 8.7 | 7.3 |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Ease of Use (194 all-time mentions) | User-centered approach, cross-platform development |

### How do the pricing models of OutSystems and Visual LANSA compare?

OutSystems receives lower satisfaction on pricing compared to Visual LANSA, with reviewers frequently citing high and complex costs for OutSystems.

- **OutSystems:** Reviewers consistently mention that OutSystems is expensive, with 75 all-time mentions of "Expensive" and 64 mentions of "Cost Issues"; pricing is described as high and complex, especially for small businesses and as usage scales.
- **Visual LANSA:** Reviewers note that Visual LANSA's price may be high compared to other options, but there are fewer negative mentions about cost complexity or unpredictability.
- **Switching reasons:** OutSystems reviewers cite cost and licensing complexity as reasons for considering alternatives, particularly for small teams or low-margin products.

### What are the best alternatives to OutSystems and Visual LANSA?

The top three G2-ranked alternatives to OutSystems and Visual LANSA are ServiceNow App Engine, Zoho Creator, and UiPath Agentic Automation.

| Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [OutSystems](https://www.g2.com/products/outsystems/reviews) | 4.5/5 (1,802 reviews) | Mid-Market | Expensive and complex pricing | Ease of Use (194 all-time mentions) |
| [Visual LANSA](https://www.g2.com/products/visual-lansa-ide/reviews) | 4.5/5 (82 reviews) | Mid-Market | Price may be high, but less complexity cited | User-centered approach, cross-platform development |
| [ServiceNow App Engine](https://www.g2.com/products/servicenow-app-engine/reviews) | 4.5/5 (1,156 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |
| [Zoho Creator](https://www.g2.com/products/zoho-creator/reviews) | 4.3/5 (165 reviews) | Small-Business | — | — |
| [UiPath Agentic Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/uipath-agentic-automation/reviews) | 4.6/5 (7,581 reviews) | Enterprise | — | — |

### Which AI Agent Builders features should I prioritize when comparing OutSystems and Visual LANSA?

Buyers comparing OutSystems and Visual LANSA should prioritize Ease of Use, Speed of Development, Integration Capabilities, Quality of Support, and Cross-Platform Development.

- **Ease of Use:** OutSystems: 9.1; Visual LANSA: 8.8; OutSystems has 194 all-time mentions for Ease of Use.
- **Speed of Development:** OutSystems: 158 all-time mentions for Speed of Development, 136 for Fast Development, 92 for Quick Development; Visual LANSA: reviewers highlight rapid application development and predefined modules.
- **Integration Capabilities:** OutSystems: 52 all-time mentions for Easy Integration, 43 for Integration Capabilities; Visual LANSA: reviewers cite flexibility integrating with legacy and cloud systems.
- **Quality of Support:** OutSystems: 8.5; Visual LANSA: 8.9.
- **Cross-Platform Development:** Visual LANSA: reviewers highlight cross-platform support for web, mobile, and desktop from a single codebase.

### What are the pros and cons of OutSystems vs Visual LANSA?

OutSystems is strongest in ease of use and speed of development, while Visual LANSA is praised for its user-centered approach and cross-platform capabilities.

- **OutSystems strengths:** Ease of Use (194 all-time mentions), Speed of Development (158), Fast Development (136), Quick Development (92), Easy Integration (52), Low Code (55), and strong modularity and reusable components.
- **OutSystems trade-offs:** Expensive (75 all-time mentions), Cost Issues (64), complex pricing, steep learning curve for advanced logic, platform lock-in, and performance slowdowns on large modules.
- **Visual LANSA strengths:** User-centered and intuitive interface, cross-platform development (web, mobile, desktop), rapid application development, strong integration with legacy and cloud systems, and repository-driven reusability.
- **Visual LANSA trade-offs:** Price may be high compared to alternatives, some limitations in customization, less comprehensive documentation, slower IDE performance at times, and a smaller developer community.

### Is OutSystems or Visual LANSA better for small businesses?

Visual LANSA is a better fit for small businesses, as OutSystems reviewers frequently cite high costs as a barrier for SMEs.

- **OutSystems:** Largest segment is Mid-Market; reviewers note that high licensing costs and complex pricing make it difficult for small businesses to adopt.
- **Visual LANSA:** Largest segment is Mid-Market; reviewers highlight its accessibility and rapid development, with fewer negative mentions about cost for small businesses.

### Which AI Agent Builders platform has better integrations?

OutSystems is favored for integrations, with reviewers frequently citing easy integration and a wide range of connectors.

- **OutSystems:** 52 all-time mentions for Easy Integration and 43 for Integration Capabilities; reviewers highlight straightforward integration with third-party databases, REST APIs, Salesforce, Snowflake, SQL Server, and Azure AI Search.
- **Visual LANSA:** Reviewers mention integration with Microsoft products, IBM i, .NET components, and legacy systems, but without all-time mention counts above the publish floor.

### How do OutSystems and Visual LANSA compare on customer support?

Visual LANSA scores higher on Quality of Support, with a 0.4-point advantage over OutSystems (8.9 vs 8.5).

- **OutSystems:** Reviewers describe support as helpful and responsive, with many citing the active community, tutorials, and certifications as valuable resources.
- **Visual LANSA:** Reviewers consistently praise the support staff as excellent, responsive, and knowledgeable, with several noting that support resolves issues quickly and provides valuable guidance.

### Which is easier to implement, OutSystems or Visual LANSA?

OutSystems is easier to implement, with a 1.4-point higher Ease of Setup score (8.7 vs 7.3).

- **OutSystems:** Reviewers frequently mention fast and straightforward initial setup, with many citing the platform's checklists, documentation, and community support as helpful for onboarding.
- **Visual LANSA:** Reviewers note that setup can be complex, with some citing lengthy installation and configuration processes, and a steeper learning curve for new users.

### Which product has better Ease of Use?

OutSystems has better Ease of Use, with a higher score and more reviewer mentions than Visual LANSA.

- **OutSystems:** Ease of Use score: 9.1; 194 all-time mentions for Ease of Use; reviewers highlight the intuitive visual development environment and low-code approach.
- **Visual LANSA:** Ease of Use score: 8.8; reviewers note its user-centered interface and accessibility, but with fewer all-time mentions and a slightly lower score.