Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Oracle TimesTen and SingleStore 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (37.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Oracle TimesTen
Star Rating
(22)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Oracle TimesTenSingleStore
Star Rating
(118)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SingleStoreSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Oracle TimesTen excels in data concurrency with a score of 9.7, which allows for high performance in environments with multiple simultaneous transactions. In contrast, SingleStore, while still strong, has a slightly lower score of 9.0 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Oracle TimesTen offers robust database locking features with a score of 9.3, ensuring data integrity during transactions. SingleStore, however, has a lower score of 8.5, which may raise concerns for users prioritizing strict data consistency.
- G2 users highlight that SingleStore shines in data types support, scoring 9.3, which allows for a wider variety of data manipulation. Oracle TimesTen, while competent, scores lower at 8.3, indicating less flexibility in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Oracle TimesTen has a strong query optimizer with a score of 9.1, which enhances performance for complex queries. SingleStore, with a score of 9.1 as well, matches this capability but lacks some of the advanced features that TimesTen offers.
- Reviewers mention that SingleStore's scalability is a standout feature, scoring 9.1, making it ideal for small businesses looking to grow. Oracle TimesTen, while still scalable, scores 8.6, which may be a consideration for users anticipating rapid expansion.
- Users say that the quality of support for SingleStore is highly rated at 8.7, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Oracle TimesTen, with a score of 8.1, has received mixed feedback regarding support, indicating room for improvement.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Oracle TimesTen
No pricing availableSingleStore
No pricing availableFree Trial
Oracle TimesTen
No trial information availableSingleStore
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
12
8.9
99
Ease of Use
8.3
11
8.7
98
Ease of Setup
7.9
7
8.4
59
Ease of Admin
7.1
8
8.1
58
Quality of Support
8.1
12
8.7
90
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
8
8.8
52
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
12
8.6
89
Features by Category
Management
9.3
5
9.3
28
9.0
5
9.4
29
9.3
5
9.0
23
9.0
5
8.8
23
Support
Not enough data
8.6
23
8.3
5
9.3
25
Not enough data
8.7
22
9.3
5
8.8
18
Security
9.3
5
8.5
19
9.3
5
8.9
19
9.3
5
8.6
19
Not enough data
8.9
20
Performance
Not enough data
8.8
20
9.7
5
9.0
22
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
9.0
23
Not enough data
9.1
24
Database Features
8.3
7
9.0
70
9.3
7
9.2
69
9.2
8
8.9
69
8.6
7
9.1
68
9.3
7
8.9
61
9.4
8
8.8
66
9.2
8
9.1
70
Data Indexing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Filters
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Oracle TimesTen and SingleStore are categorized as Relational Databases
Unique Categories
Oracle TimesTen has no unique categories
SingleStore is categorized as Real-time Analytic Database and Vector Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Oracle TimesTen
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SingleStore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Telecommunications
38.9%
Information Technology and Services
11.1%
Computer Software
11.1%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
5.6%
Restaurants
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Information Technology and Services
21.9%
Computer Software
18.4%
Financial Services
12.3%
Internet
7.0%
Banking
6.1%
Other
34.2%
Discussions
Oracle TimesTen has no discussions with answers
What is the relationship between MemSQL and MySQL?
2 Comments
LL
In fact, mysql is the best tool for working with a database. Therefore, I advise you to go to the site https://www.devart.com/dbforge/mysql/studio/ and...Read more
How to simplify scaling of MemSQL cluster?
1 Comment
FS
This question does seem particularly pertinent to microservices, as you are more likely to have multiple data stores. There are several parts to the answer....Read more
Can we Use Amazon Kinesis to ingest data into memsql
1 Comment
FS
The answer should certainly be yes, for most use cases. Kinesis is mentioned in this blog post: https://www.memsql.com/content/kafka/. For specifics, please...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
