Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Oracle Textura Payment Management and Procore

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Star Rating
(44)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Oracle Textura Payment Management
Procore
Procore
Star Rating
(4,057)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Procore excels in user experience, with many praising its comprehensive documentation and seamless communication features. Users appreciate how easy it is to onboard new team members and track project-related documents, contracts, and drawings all in one place.
  • Users say that Oracle Textura Payment Management simplifies payment processes, particularly highlighting its ability to automate invoice posting to accounting systems and eliminate math errors in subcontractor payment applications. This feature is a significant time-saver for users who previously dealt with manual calculations.
  • Reviewers mention that Procore's implementation process is notably quick and intuitive, making it easier for teams to get started. The platform's user-friendly onboarding wizard has been highlighted as a game-changer for many organizations.
  • According to verified reviews, Procore stands out in terms of support quality, with users rating it highly for responsiveness and helpfulness. This level of support is crucial for teams that rely on timely assistance to resolve issues and maintain project momentum.
  • Users highlight that while Oracle Textura Payment Management offers valuable features for organizing payment processes, some find it less flexible in adapting to specific workflow needs compared to Procore. This can lead to challenges for teams with unique requirements.
  • G2 reviewers report that Procore's overall satisfaction ratings are significantly higher than those of Oracle Textura Payment Management, indicating a stronger preference among users for Procore's comprehensive features and user-friendly design.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Oracle Textura Payment Management
No pricing available
Procore
Project Execution
Contact Us
Browse all 3 pricing plans
Free Trial
Oracle Textura Payment Management
No trial information available
Procore
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
27
8.7
2,816
Ease of Use
8.1
27
8.6
3,416
Ease of Setup
7.8
15
8.2
2,286
Ease of Admin
7.7
15
8.5
1,327
Quality of Support
8.2
27
9.0
2,668
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
15
8.8
1,290
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
26
9.5
2,755
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.2
467
Document Management
Not enough data
8.3
409
Not enough data
8.1
392
Not enough data
8.0
389
Not enough data
8.4
422
Qualifications
Not enough data
8.2
403
Not enough data
8.1
370
Not enough data
8.3
406
Construction Management
Not enough data
8.2
371
Not enough data
8.3
391
Not enough data
8.6
410
Not enough data
8.5
834
Documentation
Not enough data
7.6
578
Not enough data
9.1
809
Not enough data
8.5
782
Not enough data
8.4
728
Not enough data
8.4
754
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.7
755
Not enough data
8.6
781
Not enough data
8.5
764
Not enough data
8.7
761
Not enough data
8.4
926
Field Management
Not enough data
9.0
883
Not enough data
8.9
869
Not enough data
8.4
837
Not enough data
8.8
870
Not enough data
7.9
710
Asset Management
Not enough data
8.2
714
Not enough data
7.7
646
Not enough data
8.5
772
Not enough data
8.6
836
Construction Risk Assessment SoftwareHide 12 FeaturesShow 12 Features
Not enough data
8.5
118
Workplace Safety Management
Not enough data
8.7
113
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
9.4
113
Not enough data
8.7
110
Operational Safety Management
Not enough data
8.2
87
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
8.1
91
Not enough data
8.4
101
Logistical Safety Management
Not enough data
8.9
112
Not enough data
8.0
88
Not enough data
8.4
88
Not enough data
8.8
102
Not enough data
8.6
143
Operations Management
Not enough data
8.3
119
Not enough data
9.2
139
Not enough data
8.5
121
Not enough data
8.4
116
Not enough data
8.9
133
Not enough data
8.7
125
Construction Project ManagementHide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
8.4
1,574
Task Management
Not enough data
7.8
1217
Not enough data
7.5
1065
Not enough data
8.1
1131
Not enough data
8.8
1380
Not enough data
8.9
1468
Not enough data
8.9
1485
Site Management
Not enough data
8.5
1299
Not enough data
8.7
1418
Not enough data
8.5
1456
Not enough data
8.6
1420
Not enough data
7.6
1076
Not enough data
9.0
1485
Not enough data
7.9
1099
Construction EstimatingHide 5 FeaturesShow 5 Features
Not enough data
8.0
243
Workflow Management
Not enough data
8.1
204
Not enough data
8.1
225
Job Costing
Not enough data
7.7
212
Not enough data
8.1
206
Not enough data
8.1
210
Not enough data
8.3
363
Logistics and Operations
Not enough data
8.7
338
Not enough data
7.7
259
Not enough data
8.0
316
Not enough data
8.2
326
Not enough data
8.7
340
Not enough data
9.1
354
Not enough data
9.0
341
Not enough data
7.6
232
Not enough data
8.0
250
Not enough data
8.1
251
Construction Drawing ManagementHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.7
1,173
Document Management
Not enough data
9.0
1078
Not enough data
8.6
981
Not enough data
9.1
1143
Not enough data
8.1
917
Not enough data
8.5
956
Site Management
Not enough data
8.6
1014
Not enough data
8.8
1101
Construction Data AnalyticsHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.4
424
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
391
Not enough data
8.7
390
Not enough data
8.4
398
Not enough data
8.1
328
Not enough data
8.3
348
Not enough data
8.2
321
Not enough data
8.4
344
Not enough data
8.4
402
Site Management
Not enough data
8.5
365
Not enough data
8.4
341
Not enough data
8.1
317
Not enough data
8.2
196
Data Gathering
Not enough data
8.3
157
Not enough data
8.3
153
Not enough data
8.4
166
Bid Generation
Not enough data
8.5
169
Not enough data
7.9
143
Not enough data
8.3
153
Not enough data
8.1
148
Construction SchedulingHide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
Not enough data
8.5
114
Scheduling Workflows - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
8.7
112
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
107
Not enough data
8.6
107
Reporting & Analytics - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
8.4
107
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
107
Productivity - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
8.3
104
Not enough data
8.5
106
Not enough data
8.6
107
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Procore
Procore
Oracle Textura Payment Management and Procore are categorized as Construction Accounting
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
41.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
44.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
14.0%
Procore
Procore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
39.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
49.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
10.6%
Reviewers' Industry
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Construction
69.8%
Accounting
11.6%
Research
2.3%
Insurance
2.3%
Hospital & Health Care
2.3%
Other
11.6%
Procore
Procore
Construction
81.5%
Architecture & Planning
2.3%
Civil Engineering
2.0%
Accounting
1.3%
Commercial Real Estate
1.1%
Other
11.8%
Alternatives
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Oracle Textura Payment Management Alternatives
GCPay
GCPay
Add GCPay
Acumatica
Acumatica
Add Acumatica
Sage Intacct
Sage Intacct
Add Sage Intacct
Deltek ComputerEase
Deltek ComputerEase
Add Deltek ComputerEase
Procore
Procore Alternatives
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Autodesk Construction Cloud
Add Autodesk Construction Cloud
Fieldwire by Hilti
Fieldwire by Hilti
Add Fieldwire by Hilti
HCSS
HCSS
Add HCSS
RedTeam Flex
RedTeam Flex
Add RedTeam Flex
Discussions
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Oracle Textura Payment Management Discussions
Why is this so Difficult
1 Comment
Michael D.
MD
Yes completely on board with that. Problem after problem. Absolutely ridiculous.Read more
How do i get more productive work by this software?
1 Comment
Official Response from Oracle Textura Payment Management
Looking for training on how to get the most out of Oracle Textura Payment Management? We have the links for you. You can view all our training videos from...Read more
When will the new enhancements go live
1 Comment
Official Response from Oracle Textura Payment Management
Hi Tom, We are so looking forward to getting those new enhancements out and hope you enjoy them. We can't give you an exact date, but keep an eye out for...Read more
Procore
Procore Discussions
Can we compare sheets?
3 Comments
WC
Yes, you can compare versions of the same drawing, or two different drawings. The functionality works best on a mobile device (phone or tablet), but is also...Read more
What is Procore?
3 Comments
Official Response from Procore
Procore manages your projects, resources, and financials from project planning to closeout. Our platform connects every project contributor to solutions...Read more
What makes Procore a leading solution in construction project management software?
3 Comments
DM
Industry Standard. We have actually received RFPs that required Procore by name. In other industries there are more equal competitors for your primary...Read more