Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Oracle Textura Payment Management and Procore 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
InSite Elevation
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RedTeam Go
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
InEight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (49.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Visit Our Website
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Star Rating
(44)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Oracle Textura Payment ManagementProcore
Star Rating
(3,979)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (49.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Visit Our Website
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ProcoreSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Procore excels in Document Management, particularly with its Centralized Platform rated at 9.0, allowing for seamless access and organization of project documents. In contrast, Oracle Textura Payment Management lacks this level of centralized document handling, which reviewers mention can lead to inefficiencies.
- Reviewers mention that Procore's Field Collaboration features, rated at 9.0, significantly enhance communication among team members on-site. Users on G2 highlight the effectiveness of its Field Communication tools, while Oracle Textura Payment Management's collaboration features are rated lower, at 8.5, indicating a less robust offering.
- G2 users say that Procore's Quality of Support is a standout feature, with a score of 9.0, which many reviewers attribute to responsive customer service and comprehensive resources. Conversely, Oracle Textura Payment Management's support is rated at 8.2, with some users expressing concerns about slower response times.
- Users report that Procore's Reporting and Analytics capabilities, particularly in Project Reporting rated at 8.5, provide valuable insights for project management. In comparison, Oracle Textura Payment Management's reporting features are perceived as less intuitive, with a lower overall satisfaction rating.
- Reviewers mention that Procore's Integration with Prequalification Forms is highly rated at 8.4, making it easier to manage subcontractor qualifications. Users on G2 note that Oracle Textura Payment Management's integration capabilities are not as comprehensive, which can complicate the prequalification process.
- Users say that Procore's Mobile App functionality, rated at 8.6, allows for effective on-the-go project management, which is crucial for field teams. In contrast, Oracle Textura Payment Management's mobile capabilities are rated lower, with some users indicating that the app lacks certain features found in Procore's offering.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Oracle Textura Payment Management
No pricing availableProcore
Procore
Visit Our Website
All of Procore’s products come standard with unlimited users,
unlimited data, and unrivaled customer support.
- Access to our suite of tools
- Free iOS & Android apps
- Unlimited data storage
Free Trial
Oracle Textura Payment Management
No trial information availableProcore
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
27
8.7
2,780
Ease of Use
8.1
27
8.6
3,380
Ease of Setup
7.8
15
8.2
2,254
Ease of Admin
7.7
15
8.5
1,321
Quality of Support
8.2
27
9.0
2,636
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
15
8.8
1,284
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
26
9.5
2,721
Features by Category
Document Management
Not enough data
8.3
408
Not enough data
8.0
391
Not enough data
8.0
388
Not enough data
8.4
420
Qualifications
Not enough data
8.2
402
Not enough data
8.1
369
Not enough data
8.3
405
Construction Management
Not enough data
8.2
370
Not enough data
8.3
390
Not enough data
8.6
408
Documentation
Not enough data
7.6
578
Not enough data
9.1
808
Not enough data
8.4
781
Not enough data
8.4
727
Not enough data
8.4
754
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.7
755
Not enough data
8.6
781
Not enough data
8.5
764
Not enough data
8.7
760
Field Management
Not enough data
9.0
880
Not enough data
8.9
867
Not enough data
8.4
837
Not enough data
8.8
868
Not enough data
7.9
710
Asset Management
Not enough data
8.2
713
Not enough data
7.7
646
Not enough data
8.5
771
Not enough data
8.6
834
Workplace Safety Management
Not enough data
8.7
112
Not enough data
8.5
108
Not enough data
9.4
112
Not enough data
8.7
109
Operational Safety Management
Not enough data
8.2
87
Not enough data
8.6
109
Not enough data
8.1
91
Not enough data
8.4
101
Logistical Safety Management
Not enough data
8.9
112
Not enough data
8.0
88
Not enough data
8.4
88
Not enough data
8.8
102
Operations Management
Not enough data
8.3
118
Not enough data
9.2
137
Not enough data
8.5
120
Not enough data
8.4
115
Not enough data
8.9
132
Not enough data
8.7
124
Task Management
Not enough data
7.8
1214
Not enough data
7.5
1062
Not enough data
8.1
1129
Not enough data
8.8
1376
Not enough data
8.9
1445
Not enough data
8.9
1468
Site Management
Not enough data
8.5
1298
Not enough data
8.7
1412
Not enough data
8.5
1450
Not enough data
8.6
1416
Not enough data
7.6
1074
Not enough data
9.0
1481
Not enough data
7.9
1098
Workflow Management
Not enough data
8.1
204
Not enough data
8.1
225
Job Costing
Not enough data
7.7
212
Not enough data
8.1
206
Not enough data
8.1
210
Logistics and Operations
Not enough data
8.7
337
Not enough data
7.7
258
Not enough data
7.9
315
Not enough data
8.2
325
Not enough data
8.7
339
Not enough data
9.1
353
Not enough data
9.0
340
Not enough data
7.6
231
Not enough data
8.0
249
Not enough data
8.1
250
Document Management
Not enough data
9.0
1075
Not enough data
8.6
978
Not enough data
9.1
1137
Not enough data
8.1
915
Not enough data
8.5
952
Site Management
Not enough data
8.6
1011
Not enough data
8.8
1096
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
391
Not enough data
8.7
389
Not enough data
8.4
398
Not enough data
8.1
328
Not enough data
8.3
348
Not enough data
8.2
321
Not enough data
8.4
344
Not enough data
8.4
402
Site Management
Not enough data
8.5
365
Not enough data
8.4
341
Not enough data
8.1
318
Data Gathering
Not enough data
8.3
157
Not enough data
8.3
153
Not enough data
8.4
166
Bid Generation
Not enough data
8.5
169
Not enough data
7.9
143
Not enough data
8.3
153
Not enough data
8.1
148
Scheduling Workflows - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
8.7
112
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
107
Not enough data
8.6
107
Reporting & Analytics - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
8.4
107
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
107
Productivity - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
8.3
104
Not enough data
8.5
106
Not enough data
8.6
107
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Oracle Textura Payment Management and Procore are categorized as Construction Accounting
Unique Categories
Oracle Textura Payment Management has no unique categories
Procore is categorized as Takeoff, Prequalification, Construction Project Management, Construction ERP, Construction Risk Assessment Software, Jobsite Management, Construction Drawing Management, Construction Data Analytics, Punch List, Bid Management, Construction Estimating, and Construction Scheduling
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Oracle Textura Payment Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Procore
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Construction
69.8%
Accounting
11.6%
Research
2.3%
Insurance
2.3%
Hospital & Health Care
2.3%
Other
11.6%
Construction
81.6%
Architecture & Planning
2.3%
Civil Engineering
1.9%
Accounting
1.3%
Commercial Real Estate
1.1%
Other
11.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
How do i get more productive work by this software?
1 Comment
Official Response from Oracle Textura Payment Management
Looking for training on how to get the most out of Oracle Textura Payment Management? We have the links for you. You can view all our training videos from...Read more
Why is this so Difficult
1 Comment
MD
Yes completely on board with that. Problem after problem.
Absolutely ridiculous.Read more
When will the new enhancements go live
1 Comment
Official Response from Oracle Textura Payment Management
Hi Tom, We are so looking forward to getting those new enhancements out and hope you enjoy them. We can't give you an exact date, but keep an eye out for...Read more
Can we compare sheets?
3 Comments
WC
Yes, you can compare versions of the same drawing, or two different drawings. The functionality works best on a mobile device (phone or tablet), but is also...Read more
What is Procore?
3 Comments
Official Response from Procore
Procore manages your projects, resources, and financials from project planning to closeout. Our platform connects every project contributor to solutions...Read more
What makes Procore a leading solution in construction project management software?
3 Comments
DM
Industry Standard. We have actually received RFPs that required Procore by name. In other industries there are more equal competitors for your primary...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
