Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Oracle Essbase and Vena 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cube
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aleph
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.4% of reviews)
Mid-Market (60.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us
Oracle Essbase
Star Rating
(244)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Oracle EssbaseVena
Star Rating
(364)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (60.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Browse all 2 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Oracle Essbase excels in data import capabilities, scoring 9.0, which allows for seamless integration of large datasets, while Vena, although strong with a score of 9.0, is noted for its user-friendly interface that simplifies the import process.
- Reviewers mention that Vena shines in ease of setup with a score of 8.2, making it more accessible for teams without extensive IT support, whereas Oracle Essbase has a lower score of 6.7, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight Vena's superior quality of support, scoring 9.1, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, compared to Oracle Essbase's score of 6.0, where users have expressed frustration over slower response times.
- Users on G2 note that Oracle Essbase offers robust data management features, particularly in data consolidation with a score of 9.3, which is crucial for enterprises needing complex financial reporting, while Vena's score of 9.1 is still strong but lacks some advanced functionalities.
- Reviewers say that Vena's reporting capabilities are highly regarded, with a score of 9.4, particularly for its customizable report templates, which allow for tailored insights, whereas Oracle Essbase, with a score of 9.3, is noted for its standard reporting but lacks the same level of customization.
- Users report that Vena's budgeting features, particularly in budget hierarchies and what-if analysis, score impressively at 9.1 and 8.5 respectively, making it a favorite for financial planning, while Oracle Essbase, although strong, does not match the same level of user satisfaction in these areas.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Oracle Essbase
No pricing availableVena
Professional Plan
Contact Us
Professional Plan is the most flexible way to get started quickly and add as you grow. The plan includes: Vena Platform, Vena Copilot for FP&A, Customer Success Manager, Standard Support and Customer Portal.
- Full Microsoft Excel Integration
- Central Database
- Integrations
Free Trial
Oracle Essbase
No trial information availableVena
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
122
8.8
263
Ease of Use
7.9
123
8.6
306
Ease of Setup
6.7
82
8.1
251
Ease of Admin
7.2
83
8.5
153
Quality of Support
6.0
115
9.0
259
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
6.7
80
9.1
152
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
111
9.2
252
Features by Category
Budget Creation
Not enough data
8.8
161
Not enough data
9.0
162
Not enough data
8.8
162
Not enough data
8.8
154
Not enough data
8.4
134
Not enough data
9.0
159
Budget Management
Not enough data
9.1
145
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.8
148
Forecasting
Not enough data
9.1
154
Not enough data
9.0
148
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.9
147
Not enough data
6.6
69
Analytics
Not enough data
8.9
150
Not enough data
9.1
148
Not enough data
9.0
142
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
Not enough data
5.8
14
Not enough data
6.1
14
Not enough data
6.2
14
Data Management
9.3
12
8.9
97
9.3
12
9.0
95
8.8
11
8.5
95
Reporting Structure
8.6
11
8.9
97
8.1
12
8.7
94
8.8
11
8.8
96
Standard Analytics
8.1
12
8.3
88
9.0
12
8.6
91
9.1
11
8.7
94
9.1
11
8.8
96
Custom Analytics
8.9
11
8.4
89
8.3
10
8.4
88
8.9
12
8.8
94
8.6
11
8.6
90
Not enough data
9.0
69
Agentic AI - Financial Analysis
Not enough data
6.1
16
Not enough data
6.1
17
Platform
Not enough data
9.2
27
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.4
28
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
9.3
27
Not enough data
9.2
28
Not enough data
9.5
28
Not enough data
9.5
30
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
9.4
27
Benchmarking and Equity - Compensation Management
Not enough data
9.2
25
Not enough data
9.3
25
Not enough data
9.2
25
Platform
Not enough data
9.4
34
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
9.4
35
Not enough data
8.9
35
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
9.5
35
Not enough data
9.3
33
Reconciliation
Not enough data
8.9
74
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
76
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
65
|
Verified
Reporting
Not enough data
9.0
80
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
74
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
80
|
Verified
Closing Process
Not enough data
8.8
66
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
58
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
69
|
Verified
AI - Financial Close
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
7.1
8
Financial Planning
Not enough data
8.8
91
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.1
95
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
93
|
Verified
Agentic AI - FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
Not enough data
7.1
25
Not enough data
7.3
25
Financial Insight
Not enough data
9.3
114
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
109
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.2
111
|
Verified
Data
Not enough data
8.3
104
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
109
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
112
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
105
|
Verified
Status Communication
Not enough data
8.5
105
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
110
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
103
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
89
|
Verified
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reconciliation - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
8.8
34
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Audit - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
9.2
32
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.3
33
Integrations - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.4
31
Not enough data
9.2
31
Not enough data
9.0
31
Not enough data
9.0
31
User Permissions and Security - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.4
32
Not enough data
9.6
32
Not enough data
9.3
32
Not enough data
9.4
32
Agentic AI - Financial Reconciliation
Not enough data
7.9
8
Sales Performance Features - Sales Planning
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Not enough data
9.2
32
Not enough data
9.3
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Territory Management - Sales Planning
Not enough data
9.3
32
Not enough data
9.4
33
Quota & Capacity Management - Sales Planning
Not enough data
9.6
31
Not enough data
9.3
31
Not enough data
9.4
31
Agentic AI - Sales Planning
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Platform - Compensation Planning
Not enough data
9.8
7
Not enough data
9.5
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
6.4
6
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Additional Features - Compensation Planning
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Agentic AI - Sales Performance Management
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Incentives
Not enough data
9.1
33
Not enough data
9.5
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.3
33
Personalization
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.1
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Administrative
Not enough data
9.1
33
Not enough data
9.2
33
Not enough data
9.1
33
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Oracle Essbase and Vena are categorized as Financial Analysis
Unique Categories
Oracle Essbase has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Oracle Essbase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Vena
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Insurance
9.4%
Information Technology and Services
8.6%
Financial Services
8.2%
Oil & Energy
6.4%
Hospitality
5.2%
Other
62.2%
Information Technology and Services
9.0%
Financial Services
7.6%
Accounting
7.3%
Computer Software
5.9%
Non-Profit Organization Management
4.5%
Other
65.5%
Discussions
Oracle Essbase has no discussions with answers
How long does it take for Vena to sync the files?
2 Comments
GC
The integration we are using is automated with Netsuite and for Vena to be updated with the most recent actuals from Netsuite takes a few minutes, but I'm...Read more
What is the maximum time to wait for synchronization of the information?
1 Comment
RT
Data is saved or synchronized almost instantaneously and team members simply have to refresh the template on their side to see the updated forecast.Read more
What's the best way to create a truly dynamic input template?
1 Comment
AH
You have to map the choose options as their own measures and in a separate block. They have to be able to return independently from the the dimensions their...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
