When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found webMethods BPM easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with webMethods BPM overall.
Reviewers felt that webMethods BPM meets the needs of their business better than Oracle BPM.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Oracle BPM is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Oracle BPM over webMethods BPM.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Oracle BPM
No pricing available
webMethods BPM
No pricing available
Free Trial
Oracle BPM
No trial information available
webMethods BPM
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
56
8.5
12
Ease of Use
7.5
56
7.6
12
Ease of Setup
6.3
30
8.6
7
Ease of Admin
7.4
30
8.3
7
Quality of Support
8.0
54
7.4
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Oracle BPM is well suited for enterprise grade implementations. For lite version, I am not sure if oracle rolls out using containerised version. If...Read more
How do you evaluate best BPM tool?
1 Comment
KG
While implementing large scale applications where certain predefined process needs to be automated, a BPM tool is pretty much helpful and selection of the...Read more
What are the major objectives of BPM?
1 Comment
JS
Tools such as SwevenBPM strive to create a platform where users can have better control, communication and distribution of their regular workflow. With tools...Read more
Whys sag bpm is not as robust as its competitors . Also why its not as user friendly for developers
1 Comment
AS
Their BPM server is very heavy as compared to their peers. Also all bpm components are tightly coupled and its error handling is not at all developer...Read more
webMethods BPM has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.