Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Oracle Aconex and Projul 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent Lucernex
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
InEight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (100.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Visit Our Website
Oracle Aconex
Star Rating
(229)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Browse all 2 pricing plansProjul
Star Rating
(37)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (100.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Visit Our Website
Learn more about ProjulSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Oracle Aconex excels in "Document Management" with a score of 9.6, allowing for seamless collaboration and organization of project documents, while Projul, with a score of 8.7, offers solid document management but lacks some advanced features that Aconex provides.
- Reviewers mention that Projul shines in "Ease of Use" with a score of 9.6, making it particularly appealing for small businesses that may not have extensive training resources, whereas Oracle Aconex, with a score of 8.8, is perceived as slightly more complex due to its extensive features.
- G2 users highlight that Oracle Aconex has superior "Field Collaboration" capabilities, scoring 8.7, which is crucial for large-scale projects, while Projul's score of 8.0 indicates it may not meet the same level of collaborative needs for larger teams.
- Users on G2 report that Projul's "Quality of Support" is exceptional, scoring 9.9, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, compared to Oracle Aconex's score of 8.8, which, while still good, does not match Projul's level of customer service.
- Reviewers mention that Oracle Aconex's "Project Tracking" features are robust, scoring 9.0, providing detailed insights and analytics, while Projul, with a score of 9.4, offers strong tracking capabilities but lacks some of the advanced reporting features that Aconex users appreciate.
- Users say that Projul's "Mobile App" functionality, scoring 8.6, is user-friendly and effective for on-the-go project management, while Oracle Aconex's mobile capabilities, with a score of 8.2, are seen as less intuitive, which can hinder field operations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Oracle Aconex
No pricing availableFree Trial
Oracle Aconex
No trial information availableProjul
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
139
9.3
29
Ease of Use
8.8
141
9.5
29
Ease of Setup
8.9
49
9.8
17
Ease of Admin
8.8
49
9.6
16
Quality of Support
8.8
129
9.9
29
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
51
9.8
16
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
121
10.0
24
Features by Category
Cost Tracking
8.4
25
Not enough data
8.5
24
Not enough data
8.3
23
Not enough data
Planning
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Management
8.9
36
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
9.6
38
Not enough data
Field Management
8.7
40
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
9.0
38
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Asset Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
39
Not enough data
9.0
40
Not enough data
Task Management
8.3
53
9.0
17
8.3
53
Feature Not Available
8.8
61
Feature Not Available
9.0
75
9.4
20
9.4
80
9.3
21
9.2
81
8.9
22
Site Management
Feature Not Available
9.2
21
9.0
77
8.7
22
8.2
66
8.6
22
9.0
74
8.0
20
Feature Not Available
8.9
15
8.9
74
9.4
22
Feature Not Available
9.2
19
Workflow Management
Not enough data
9.6
23
Not enough data
8.8
20
Job Costing
Not enough data
6.7
6
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
9.3
19
Scheduling Workflows - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting & Analytics - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Productivity - Construction Scheduling
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Oracle Aconex and Projul are categorized as Construction Project Management
Unique Categories
Oracle Aconex is categorized as Jobsite Management, Capital Project Management, and Project Cost Management
Projul is categorized as Construction Estimating and Construction Scheduling
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Oracle Aconex
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Projul
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Construction
62.4%
Civil Engineering
6.1%
Architecture & Planning
4.6%
Management Consulting
4.1%
Oil & Energy
3.6%
Other
19.3%
Construction
94.6%
Retail
2.7%
Environmental Services
2.7%
‐
‐
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is it possible to reduce the total cost and training charges of this product?
1 Comment
BU
if Yes, Small Project may use AconexRead more
What is the best way to upload multiple files with separate descriptions and disciplines
1 Comment
LV
If we can upload multiple files but its hard to write descriptions 1 by 1.
Read more
Projul has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
