Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Optimizely Web Experimentation and SiteSpect 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Quizell
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Octopus Deploy
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
BackBox
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (43.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Vendor
$ 5 Users
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Star Rating
(408)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (47.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Vendor
Learn more about Optimizely Web ExperimentationSiteSpect
Star Rating
(60)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$ 5 Users
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Optimizely Web Experimentation excels in Ease of Use with a score of 8.2, while SiteSpect falls behind at 7.0, making Optimizely a more user-friendly option for those new to experimentation.
- Reviewers mention that Optimizely's Data Enrichment feature stands out with a high score of 9.3, providing robust capabilities for enhancing visitor data, whereas SiteSpect does not offer comparable data enrichment features.
- G2 users highlight that Optimizely's Segmentation capabilities, particularly in A/B Testing (8.8), are superior to SiteSpect's offerings, which may limit the effectiveness of targeted experiments.
- Users on G2 report that SiteSpect shines in Quality of Support with a score of 9.0, indicating a more responsive and helpful support team compared to Optimizely's score of 8.0, which could be crucial for businesses needing assistance.
- Reviewers say that Optimizely's Customization options (8.8) allow for greater flexibility in tailoring experiments, while SiteSpect's customization features are perceived as less comprehensive, potentially limiting creative experimentation.
- Users report that both platforms offer strong Mobile Testing capabilities, but Optimizely's score of 8.4 suggests a more refined experience compared to SiteSpect, which may not provide the same level of optimization for mobile users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Enterprise
Contact Vendor
Customized For Your Business.
SiteSpect
Server-Side
$
5 Users
SiteSpect's Server-Side optimization package
- 10 Built-In Campaigns
- Targeting & Personalization
- Dashboard & Analytics
Free Trial
Optimizely Web Experimentation
No trial information availableSiteSpect
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
296
8.7
44
Ease of Use
8.1
309
7.1
44
Ease of Setup
8.0
155
6.4
17
Ease of Admin
8.2
124
7.6
16
Quality of Support
8.0
252
9.0
46
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.9
119
8.5
17
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
271
7.7
45
Features by Category
Visitor Behavior
7.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
26
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.6
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
Templates
7.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.3
23
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
Personalization
7.6
23
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.7
26
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.9
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.0
19
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
Multichannel
8.5
26
|
Verified
Not enough data
6.9
20
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
25
|
Verified
Not enough data
Administration
8.0
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
23
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - E-Commerce Personalization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Segmentation
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.1
14
Not enough data
Targeting
7.6
21
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
Triggered Content
7.8
16
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
7.4
13
Feature Not Available
Personalized Content
8.0
15
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
8.7
18
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Personalization Engines
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Sourcing
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Intelligence
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
8.3
24
Not enough data
8.3
25
Not enough data
8.0
23
Not enough data
Functionality
8.0
25
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
7.6
26
Not enough data
Computing
7.9
67
6.7
5
6.4
61
Not enough data
6.9
72
4.7
5
Experimental Design
8.4
70
8.3
5
8.7
69
8.7
5
8.7
69
7.3
5
Analytics
8.2
68
7.7
5
5.8
62
Not enough data
Agentic AI - A/B Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Personalization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Optimizely Web Experimentation and SiteSpect are categorized as Feature Management, Personalization Engines, A/B Testing, and Personalization
Unique Categories
Optimizely Web Experimentation is categorized as E-Commerce Personalization, Customer Data Platform (CDP), and Configuration Management
SiteSpect has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SiteSpect
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
11.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.3%
Financial Services
9.1%
Retail
8.1%
Marketing and Advertising
8.1%
Other
54.4%
Retail
20.3%
Marketing and Advertising
8.5%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
6.8%
Internet
6.8%
Information Technology and Services
6.8%
Other
50.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
How does A/B Testing work?
1 Comment
TS
A/B testing is when you have a least two variations of something you want to test. Typically you have a control (which may be the current variant) and then...Read more
What are some ways that I can use A/B testing?
1 Comment
TS
Testing is ongoing and endless. We test new features such as additional form fields in a lead form. We test multiple CTAs to decide which produces the best...Read more
Optimizely Web Experimentation has no more discussions with answers
SiteSpect has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
