Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenVAS and Veracode Application Security Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenVAS
Star Rating
(32)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (53.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenVASVeracode Application Security Platform
Star Rating
(25)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Veracode Application Security PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Veracode Application Security Platform excels in its Static Code Analysis feature, with a score of 9.3, which reviewers mention provides comprehensive insights into code vulnerabilities, making it a strong choice for enterprises focused on secure coding practices.
- Reviewers mention that OpenVAS shines in its Vulnerability Scan capabilities, achieving a score of 8.8, which users say offers thorough detection of network vulnerabilities, making it particularly effective for mid-market companies looking for robust network security solutions.
- G2 users highlight that Veracode's Quality of Support is rated at 8.0, with many reviewers saying that the support team is responsive and helpful, which is crucial for enterprises that require reliable assistance during critical security assessments.
- Users on G2 report that OpenVAS has a higher Ease of Setup score of 7.9 compared to Veracode's 5.7, indicating that users find OpenVAS more user-friendly and quicker to implement, which is a significant advantage for teams with limited resources.
- Reviewers mention that Veracode's Product Direction score of 6.3 reflects some concerns about its future development, while OpenVAS's score of 8.1 suggests a more positive outlook, with users saying they feel more confident in OpenVAS's ongoing improvements and feature enhancements.
- Users report that Veracode's False Positives score of 6.6 is a drawback, as many reviewers mention that it can lead to unnecessary alerts, whereas OpenVAS's score of 7.8 indicates a better performance in minimizing false positives, which is essential for maintaining operational efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenVAS
No pricing availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenVAS
No trial information availableVeracode Application Security Platform
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
21
8.1
19
Ease of Use
7.7
21
7.3
19
Ease of Setup
7.9
15
5.7
7
Ease of Admin
7.7
15
7.4
7
Quality of Support
6.9
15
8.0
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.5
10
7.9
7
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
18
6.3
19
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
7.9
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
6
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
7.8
6
Performance
7.9
13
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
6.6
15
Not enough data
8.3
13
Not enough data
Network
7.5
12
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
7.0
11
Not enough data
Application
8.5
10
Not enough data
5.7
9
Not enough data
7.8
13
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenVAS and Veracode Application Security Platform are categorized as Vulnerability Scanner
Unique Categories
OpenVAS has no unique categories
Veracode Application Security Platform is categorized as AI AppSec Assistants, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Penetration Testing, Static Code Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenVAS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Veracode Application Security Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
25.0%
Hospital & Health Care
14.3%
Information Technology and Services
10.7%
Computer Software
10.7%
Management Consulting
7.1%
Other
32.1%
Information Technology and Services
30.4%
Hospital & Health Care
13.0%
Consumer Goods
8.7%
Computer Software
8.7%
Telecommunications
4.3%
Other
34.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenVAS has no discussions with answers
Veracode Application Security Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
