Compare OpenVAS and Qualys WAS

OpenVAS vs Qualys WAS

• Users report that Qualys WAS excels in ease of setup with a perfect score of 10.0, while OpenVAS users mention a lower score of 7.9, indicating that Qualys provides a more streamlined onboarding experience.
• Reviewers mention that Qualys WAS has a superior detection rate of 9.1 compared to OpenVAS's 8.1, highlighting that Qualys is more effective at identifying vulnerabilities during scans.
• G2 users note that the quality of support for Qualys WAS is rated at 9.3, significantly higher than OpenVAS's 6.9, suggesting that users of Qualys benefit from more responsive and helpful customer service.
• Users on G2 report that Qualys WAS has a lower false positive rate of 6.2, while OpenVAS has a slightly higher rate of 6.6, indicating that Qualys may provide more accurate results in vulnerability assessments.
• Reviewers say that Qualys WAS shines in automated scans with a score of 9.6, whereas OpenVAS scores 8.3, suggesting that Qualys offers more robust automation features that save time and effort for users.
• Users report that while OpenVAS scores higher in manual application testing at 8.5 compared to Qualys's 7.1, this indicates that OpenVAS may be more suitable for users who require detailed manual testing capabilities.