Compare Opentext functional Testing and TestComplete 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Opentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingTestComplete
Star Rating
(97)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestCompleteOpentext functional Testing vs TestComplete
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Opentext functional Testing easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Opentext functional Testing overall.
- Reviewers felt that Opentext functional Testing meets the needs of their business better than TestComplete.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Opentext functional Testing is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of TestComplete over Opentext functional Testing.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing availableTestComplete
No pricing availableFree Trial
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information availableTestComplete
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
40
8.5
82
Ease of Use
8.1
39
8.0
82
Ease of Setup
8.1
19
7.8
36
Ease of Admin
8.2
18
7.5
35
Quality of Support
8.5
38
8.1
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
7.9
36
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
37
8.3
82
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Automation
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing and TestComplete are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
TestComplete is categorized as Mobile App Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
TestComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Education Management
4.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.5%
Financial Services
3.3%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
39.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
TestComplete has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
