Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and TestComplete 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringTestComplete
Star Rating
(97)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestCompleteSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in stress testing with a score of 8.3, while TestComplete's capabilities in this area are less emphasized, indicating that LoadRunner may be better suited for enterprises focused on performance testing.
- Reviewers mention that LoadRunner's test variety is impressive, scoring 9.3, which suggests it offers a broader range of testing scenarios compared to TestComplete, which may limit flexibility in certain testing environments.
- G2 users highlight that LoadRunner's reporting features are robust, achieving a score of 9.0, allowing for detailed insights into test results, whereas TestComplete's reporting capabilities, while functional, do not receive the same level of acclaim.
- Users on G2 indicate that TestComplete shines in ease of setup with a score of 7.8, making it more accessible for teams looking to implement testing solutions quickly, compared to LoadRunner's lower score of 6.7 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that LoadRunner has a strong focus on enterprise-level functionality, which is reflected in its higher G2 rating of 4.4, while TestComplete, with a rating of 4.2, is more tailored towards mid-market users, suggesting a difference in target audience.
- Users say that the quality of support for TestComplete is rated higher at 8.1 compared to LoadRunner's 7.6, indicating that TestComplete may provide better customer service and assistance for users navigating the software.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableTestComplete
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableTestComplete
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
23
8.5
82
Ease of Use
8.3
24
8.0
82
Ease of Setup
6.7
9
7.8
36
Ease of Admin
7.4
9
7.5
35
Quality of Support
7.6
24
8.1
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
7.9
36
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
23
8.3
82
Features by Category
Functionality
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Reporting
9.0
7
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and TestComplete are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Load Testing Tools
TestComplete is categorized as Mobile App Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
TestComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.5%
Financial Services
3.3%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
39.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
TestComplete has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
