Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and OpenText Silk Performer 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringOpenText Silk Performer
Star Rating
(28)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Silk PerformerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in its "Test Variety" feature, scoring a remarkable 9.3, which allows for a wide range of testing scenarios, while OpenText Silk Performer, although strong, does not match this level of versatility.
- Reviewers mention that the "Ease of Setup" is significantly better in OpenText Silk Performer, with a score of 8.5 compared to LoadRunner's 6.7, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to get started quickly.
- G2 users highlight the superior "Quality of Support" for OpenText Silk Performer, which received an 8.2 rating, indicating that users feel more supported and guided through their testing processes compared to LoadRunner's 7.6.
- Users on G2 emphasize the importance of "Reporting" capabilities, where OpenText LoadRunner Professional shines with a score of 9.0, providing detailed insights that help teams make informed decisions, while Silk Performer does not offer the same depth in reporting.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText Silk Performer has a better "Ease of Admin" score at 8.5, suggesting that it is easier to manage and maintain, which is crucial for teams with limited resources.
- Users say that while both products have strong "Product Direction" ratings, OpenText Silk Performer leads with a score of 9.2, indicating a more positive outlook on future updates and enhancements, which is a key consideration for long-term investment.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableOpenText Silk Performer
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableOpenText Silk Performer
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
23
8.8
16
Ease of Use
8.3
24
8.9
16
Ease of Setup
6.7
9
8.5
10
Ease of Admin
7.4
9
8.5
10
Quality of Support
7.6
24
8.2
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
8.5
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
23
9.2
14
Features by Category
Functionality
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Reporting
9.0
7
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and OpenText Silk Performer are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
OpenText Silk Performer has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Silk Performer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Banking
18.2%
Retail
9.1%
Computer Software
9.1%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
4.5%
Other
40.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
OpenText Silk Performer has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
