Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Opentext functional Testing and TestComplete 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Opentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingTestComplete
Star Rating
(97)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TestCompleteSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that TestComplete excels in its test variety, with a score of 8.3, allowing for a wide range of testing scenarios, while OpenText UFT One, although strong, has a slightly lower emphasis on this aspect.
- Reviewers mention that the ease of setup for OpenText UFT One is rated higher at 8.1 compared to TestComplete's 7.8, indicating that users find UFT One more straightforward to implement in their environments.
- G2 users highlight the quality of support for OpenText UFT One, scoring it at 8.5, which is notably higher than TestComplete's 8.1, suggesting that users feel more supported when using UFT One.
- Users on G2 report that TestComplete's customization features, rated at 8.1, allow for tailored testing solutions, which some users find beneficial for specific project needs, while UFT One's customization options are perceived as less flexible.
- Reviewers say that TestComplete's thoroughness in testing, with a score of 8.1, is a strong point, as it provides comprehensive coverage, whereas OpenText UFT One, while reliable, has a slightly lower score of 7.7 in this area.
- Users report that both products have similar star ratings of 4.2, but TestComplete is favored in the mid-market segment, while OpenText UFT One is more popular among enterprise users, reflecting their target audiences.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing availableTestComplete
No pricing availableFree Trial
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information availableTestComplete
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
40
8.5
82
Ease of Use
8.1
39
8.0
82
Ease of Setup
8.1
19
7.8
36
Ease of Admin
8.2
18
7.5
35
Quality of Support
8.5
38
8.1
81
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
7.9
36
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
37
8.3
82
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Automation
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing and TestComplete are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
TestComplete is categorized as Mobile App Testing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
TestComplete
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Computer Software
25.0%
Information Technology and Services
23.9%
Hospital & Health Care
6.5%
Financial Services
3.3%
Telecommunications
2.2%
Other
39.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
TestComplete has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
