Compare Opentext functional Testing and Postman 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Opentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingPostman
Star Rating
(1,736)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (36.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Postman excels in user experience, with many users praising its intuitive interface that makes API testing and development straightforward. One user noted, "I like how simple the interface is—even as a beginner, I didn’t feel lost while using it."
- Users say that Postman offers exceptional scripting capabilities, allowing for complex request chaining and automation. A reviewer highlighted, "The scripting capabilities within the 'Pre-request Script' and 'Tests' tabs are what truly elevate Postman from a simple client to a full automation suite."
- According to verified reviews, Opentext functional Testing is recognized for its speed during test execution, which users find beneficial for functional and regression testing. One user mentioned, "The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadR...".
- Reviewers mention that while Opentext functional Testing supports a wide range of technologies, including web, mobile, and desktop applications, it may not be as user-friendly as Postman. Some users expressed challenges in navigating its features compared to the simplicity of Postman.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Postman has a significantly higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong market presence and user approval. With a G2 Score of 94.89, users appreciate the quick results and ease of setup, stating, "It helps you to get quick results. Using curls it's easy all the time."
- Users indicate that while Opentext functional Testing has unique AI-powered features, it faces challenges in terms of support and community engagement, as evidenced by the lack of recent reviews. In contrast, Postman has received a steady stream of feedback, indicating a vibrant user community and ongoing product development.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing availablePostman
Free Plan
Free
For individuals or a small team of 3 or less to start testing APIs.
- Up to 3 collaborators
- Access to API Client
- 3 Packages
Free Trial
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information availablePostman
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
40
9.3
1,358
Ease of Use
8.1
39
9.2
1,376
Ease of Setup
8.1
19
9.3
622
Ease of Admin
8.2
18
9.0
189
Quality of Support
8.5
38
8.7
1,128
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
9.0
161
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
37
9.2
1,316
Features by Category
API Management
Not enough data
8.8
131
Not enough data
9.1
133
Not enough data
8.7
131
Not enough data
8.8
125
Security Testing
Not enough data
8.6
124
Not enough data
9.4
129
Not enough data
9.5
135
Security Management
Not enough data
8.8
121
Not enough data
8.4
120
Not enough data
7.9
120
Development
Not enough data
9.5
562
Not enough data
8.7
499
Not enough data
8.7
478
Not enough data
8.8
496
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.8
504
Not enough data
8.8
488
Not enough data
8.9
499
Functionality
Not enough data
9.4
30
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
8.9
29
Not enough data
9.5
29
Usability
Not enough data
9.0
28
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
9.4
33
Functionality
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Automation
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
8.9
17
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
9.0
15
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.9
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.8
16
Development - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.6
350
Not enough data
8.8
281
Not enough data
8.8
256
Not enough data
8.8
267
Collaboration - API Platforms
Not enough data
8.9
286
Not enough data
8.8
264
Not enough data
8.6
254
API Management - API Platforms
Not enough data
9.0
265
Not enough data
8.4
259
Not enough data
8.5
254
Not enough data
8.9
267
Not enough data
8.2
251
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
8.1
167
Not enough data
8.0
163
Not enough data
8.1
164
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
API Construction
Not enough data
9.5
836
Not enough data
8.7
709
Not enough data
8.7
649
Not enough data
8.7
358
API Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
754
Not enough data
8.9
723
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
632
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.8
665
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing and Postman are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing is categorized as Automation Testing
Postman is categorized as Service Virtualization, API Platforms, API Development, API Security, API Management, Build Automation, and AI Agent Builders
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Postman
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Education Management
4.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Computer Software
35.3%
Information Technology and Services
30.3%
Financial Services
3.3%
Banking
2.0%
Internet
1.8%
Other
27.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
What is Postman used for?
7 Comments
KK
Personnaly i used postman for connect multiple softwares through API.Read more
Is it possible to make such a service in the form of a Web App ?
3 Comments
VN
Hey Shrini,
We recently launched Postman on the Web feature to use on a browser. Make sure to install the Postman Agent file to bypass any CORDS...Read more
Is there any alternative?
3 Comments
LP
There exists Postwoman as an alternative:
https://postwoman.ioRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
