Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Core Application Security and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
StackHawk
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Core Application Security
Star Rating
(34)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Core Application SecurityOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText Fortify On Demand excels in its API and integrations, scoring a high 9.0, which allows for seamless connectivity with other tools, enhancing workflow efficiency. In contrast, OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, while still strong, does not emphasize integrations as much, leading to a slightly lower extensibility score of 8.7.
- Reviewers mention that the ease of use is a standout feature for OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, with a score of 8.7, making it more user-friendly for teams new to static code analysis. OpenText Fortify On Demand, while still user-friendly, has a slightly lower score of 8.2, indicating a steeper learning curve for some users.
- G2 users highlight the quality of support for OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, which received an 8.6 rating, suggesting that users feel well-supported during their implementation and usage. Conversely, OpenText Fortify On Demand has a lower support rating of 8.0, indicating some users may experience challenges in getting timely assistance.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText Fortify On Demand shines in its test automation capabilities, scoring 8.5, which is crucial for teams looking to integrate security testing into their CI/CD pipelines. OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer, while effective, has a lower score of 7.7 for manual testing, indicating it may not be as robust in that area.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a strong detection rate of 8.3, which is essential for identifying vulnerabilities effectively. In comparison, OpenText Fortify On Demand has a lower detection rate score, which may lead to concerns about its effectiveness in catching all potential issues.
- Users say that OpenText Fortify On Demand has a higher false positive rate, scoring only 6.5, which can lead to frustration and wasted time for development teams. In contrast, OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a better reputation for accuracy, contributing to a more efficient workflow for users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Core Application Security
No pricing availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Core Application Security
Free Trial is available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.1
31
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.2
31
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
8.2
12
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.9
12
8.1
9
Quality of Support
7.9
30
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
12
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
30
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Analysis
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Testing
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
6.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) ToolsHide 4 FeaturesShow 4 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Threat Detection & Response - Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)Hide 1 FeatureShow 1 Feature
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Core Application Security and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
OpenText Core Application Security is categorized as Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST), and Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) Tools
OpenText Static Application Security Testing is categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Core Application Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
26.5%
Computer Software
8.8%
Computer & Network Security
8.8%
Construction
5.9%
Airlines/Aviation
5.9%
Other
44.1%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenText Core Application Security has no discussions with answers
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
