Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Forensic (EnCase) and Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Nuix Neo Investigations
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Mid-Market (35.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
Star Rating
(13)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Forensic (EnCase)Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
Star Rating
(66)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (35.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that FireEye Network Security and Forensics excels in "Continuous Analysis," with a score of 8.1, indicating a strong capability in real-time monitoring and threat detection, while OpenText EnCase Forensic, although rated higher overall, does not emphasize this feature as strongly.
- Reviewers mention that FireEye's "Incident Reports" feature scores an impressive 8.1, providing detailed insights into security incidents, whereas OpenText EnCase Forensic, while effective, has a slightly lower focus on this area, which may impact users needing comprehensive reporting.
- G2 users highlight that FireEye's "Response Automation" feature, rated at 8.0, allows for efficient incident response, streamlining workflows, while OpenText EnCase Forensic's automation capabilities are noted to be less robust, potentially leading to slower response times.
- Users on G2 indicate that FireEye's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.3, suggesting a strong customer service experience, whereas OpenText EnCase Forensic's support rating of 7.8 may leave some users wanting more in terms of assistance and guidance.
- Reviewers mention that FireEye's "Ease of Use" is rated at 8.0, making it more accessible for users who may not be as technically inclined, while OpenText EnCase Forensic's lower score of 7.6 suggests a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Users say that FireEye's focus on "Intrusion Prevention" and "Anomaly Detection" is particularly strong, which is crucial for proactive security measures, while OpenText EnCase Forensic, although effective in its own right, does not emphasize these features as prominently, potentially impacting its effectiveness in real-time threat mitigation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
No pricing availableTrellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
No trial information availableTrellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.0
9
8.6
53
Ease of Use
7.6
9
8.2
53
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.9
19
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.2
20
Quality of Support
7.8
9
8.0
50
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.2
19
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
9
7.6
54
Features by Category
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
8.4
20
Prevention
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.1
15
Detection
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
8.8
19
Not enough data
8.6
18
Administration
Not enough data
8.2
16
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
7.6
17
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Incident Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
7.4
9
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
Functionality
6.7
7
Not enough data
6.4
7
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
Remediation
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Forensic (EnCase) and Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) are categorized as Digital Forensics
Unique Categories
OpenText Forensic (EnCase) has no unique categories
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) is categorized as Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS) and Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
30.8%
Law Enforcement
23.1%
Information Technology and Services
15.4%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
7.7%
Government Relations
7.7%
Other
15.4%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
9.4%
Government Administration
4.7%
Education Management
4.7%
Computer Software
4.7%
Other
60.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenText Forensic (EnCase) has no discussions with answers
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
