Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare OpenText Core Performance Engineering and OpenText Silk Performer

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(13)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer
Star Rating
(28)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (54.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Silk Performer
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Reviews say that OpenText LoadRunner Cloud excels in stress testing with a score of 9.3, while OpenText Silk Performer, although strong, has not been rated as highly in this area, indicating that LoadRunner Cloud may provide more robust capabilities for handling high-load scenarios.
  • Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Cloud offers a wider variety of testing options, scoring 9.4 in test variety, which allows for more comprehensive testing strategies compared to Silk Performer, which may limit users in certain testing scenarios.
  • Reviewers mention that the reporting features in OpenText LoadRunner Cloud are particularly strong, with a score of 9.3, providing detailed insights that users find beneficial for analyzing performance metrics, whereas Silk Performer, while functional, does not match this level of detail.
  • G2 users highlight that OpenText LoadRunner Cloud has a higher ease of use rating at 9.2, suggesting that it may be more intuitive for new users compared to Silk Performer, which has a slightly lower rating of 8.9, indicating a steeper learning curve.
  • Users on G2 appreciate the quality of support provided by OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, scoring 8.8, which is notably higher than Silk Performer's score of 8.2, suggesting that LoadRunner Cloud may offer more responsive and helpful customer service.
  • Reviewers mention that OpenText LoadRunner Cloud has received a perfect score of 10.0 for product direction, indicating strong confidence in its future development and enhancements, while Silk Performer, with a score of 9.2, still shows promise but may not inspire the same level of confidence among users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
No pricing available
OpenText Silk Performer
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
No trial information available
OpenText Silk Performer
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
11
8.8
16
Ease of Use
9.2
11
8.9
16
Ease of Setup
9.2
8
8.5
10
Ease of Admin
9.0
8
8.5
10
Quality of Support
8.8
10
8.2
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
8
8.5
10
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
10
9.2
14
Features by Category
9.4
10
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
10
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
9.4
9
Not enough data
Reporting
9.3
9
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Core Performance Engineering and OpenText Silk Performer are categorized as Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering has no unique categories
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
53.8%
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
4.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
40.9%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
54.5%
Reviewers' Industry
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
Information Technology and Services
30.8%
Computer Software
30.8%
Financial Services
23.1%
Insurance
7.7%
Government Administration
7.7%
Other
0.0%
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Banking
18.2%
Retail
9.1%
Computer Software
9.1%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
4.5%
Other
40.9%
Alternatives
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
k6
k6
Add k6
Locust
Locust
Add Locust
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer Alternatives
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
LoadView
LoadView
Add LoadView
Discussions
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
OpenText Core Performance Engineering Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Core Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
OpenText Silk Performer
OpenText Silk Performer Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Silk Performer has no discussions with answers